I agree with moving here. I do have a bit of a bias however, as I was the dumbass who got banned. However, even if it was someone else, the circumstances of the ban as well as the whole risk of the slippery slope, I think I would still be in favor of moving here.
As for the circumstances I mentioned, the post that they removed and banned me for was virtually identical to the post above it (which was not removed). The only difference was that some of the sketch lines had been removed from one of them. The two posts were made back to back. It would be impossible to see one without seeing the other. I would completely understand if they banned me and removed BOTH posts, or if they did not ban me and removed neither post, but I cannot understand the logic of doing one but not the other. Also, I don't know exactly what their definition of "depictions of sexual abuse of a minor" is, but it certainly wasn't the same as mine. Minor? Yes. Sexual? No.* Abuse? Absolutely not. In the appeal, I made note of all this, also said that it wasn't my intent to nor did I realize the post would violate code whatever, that I would not do so again now that I had a clearer idea of what this regulation applied to, etc. They denied it without the possibility of further appeal.
*the only way this could even be REMOTELY considered sexual in nature is if you subscribe to the "all nudity is inherently sexual" theology. Even if that is the case, it still was absolutely not abusive.