>I know this is a very naive stance to take but I like to think anyone capable and willing to make something worthwhile will do so regardless of labels or cliques.
The people capable of building bridges aren't allowed to do so unless they get authorization from a university, which demands that instead of learning how to build bridges, they spend the better part of a decade learning why they are evil for being male and white and not liking penises in their butts. So many people who are capable don't sign up for the training, or stop going because they realize they aren't being trained at all. But oh, wait, many of the people who would be capable aren't even accepted into the training because they are white (or asian) and male, and they don't like penises in their butts, but plenty of unqualified "people" get in literally because they aren't those things. The people who do finish the training haven't learned anything, and their grades are at least partially based on the same factors that got them into the school, instead of how well they can design and build bridges. And the graduates that then get hired aren't hired on their merit anyway, they're hired based on the same factors that got them into the schools. Then bridges fall down. Your only hope is the people who were actually qualified, worked even harder than they should need to so that their grades were so damn high they couldn't be ignored even though they were the wrong race and sex, and they had the wrong opinion on if it feels good to take a penis in the butt. Then those people had to sit through nearly a decade of soul crushing time wasting, being told in every "class" that they are evil for the way they were born, and that their hard work only makes them more evil. Then they have to continue being leagues better, and even then, they'll lose out on many jobs, but they might get some, and those bridges might not fall down. Except bridges take many people, and some of the others might be unqualified hires, and they might fuck things up anyway.
Meanwhile if people who are qualified but don't want to put up with all that bullshit try to build a bridge, the government will stop them and put them in jail, or steal enough money that their lives will be ruined. So those people go off to become other things instead. And those things may be useful, but so are bridges, and those aren't gonna get built to as high standards as we had for thousands of years, because the government won't allow them to be. We have bridges from Ancient Rome that are still in use. Meanwhile we have modern bridges where the government is so busy celebrating that they only allowed women to work on their construction that they don't care that the bridges collapse within six months and kill hundreds of people.
And again, bridges are just an example, and a microcosm of society.
>I'm curious, what kind of rape porn do modern stacy SJW teachers assign?
A teenage girl goes to a party and gets drunk, then she fucks chad thundercock, but later decides she doesn't like the realization that she is a slut, so she cries rape, and the guy gets his life ruined. The end. There. I just told 45% of the books that are assigned in Junior High and High Schools. Another 45% is about the holocaust. Maybe 10% is actual stuff that a kid might like, or is at least classic enough that the kid would learn some bit of literary canon and understand cultural references better. But oh wait, I forgot that now everything is about racism. So now it's 33% rape, 33% holocaust, and 33% racism. 1% standards or classics or things kids (or anyone who isn't a 40 year old SJW stacy) might actually like.
But note that there is significant crossover between these groups. Many things will have holocaust, racism, and rape, or at least two of the three. In fact I'd say most would have significant crossover of at least two of the three. Rape is usually involved. Racism and holocaust don't cross over much though because jews and blacks both don't want to share the spotlight, but almost every book assigned will be written by a feminist cunt, and have rape in the holocaust, or rape that is somehow based on racism (which makes no fucking sense because, as other boards on this site, and dating site stats, for that matter, will show you, racists don't want to touch, let alone fuck, the races that disgust them). Also there is crossover between what I am counting as a "standard" or "classic" and the other three categories. I'm not going to complain about To Kill A Mockingbird because at least it is a very influential work that is commonly referenced in American society, so reading it will give students an understanding of those ubiquitous references. Also it isn't even really about racism at its core, it's about prejudice in general, as exemplified by Boo Radley being a much more important part of the book than Tom Robinson, but most teachers are too stupid to understand this.
Also there are cases like Othello, where dumbass SJWs will try to claim that the moors were black and then make the whole thing about black people, even though A) the moors weren't black and a fucking cursory knowledge or google search of basic history would teach you this, and anyone with this Costanza-esque level of illiteracy of basic history shouldn't be a teacher anyway, and B) Othello's race is a side issue to the story at best. But they make it all about that instead of the themes that are far more prevalent in the play. But still, I'm not going to lump in Othello with all the black supremacist shit they're forcing on children, just because they teach it wrong. Again, Shakespeare is very culturally important, and at the very least, by knowing it, students would be able to interact more with a culture that constantly references it, so it is a much more valid choice to assign in schools than most things. The problem isn't that Othello shouldn't be assigned to students, it's that those teachers who teach it wrong shouldn't be assigned to students.
And to answer your spoiler, don't worry, none of the rape porn is explicit. What makes them cum isn't the descriptions of chad cock, it's getting immersed in the feeling of "victimhood." "Ooh, yes, everyone feels bad for me. Ohh, they're all gonna kill that mean boy that I already had my way with before I stopped and thought about how he doesn't have enough money or status to help me monkey-branch up the social ladder. Ugggh, I love convincing myself that not only am I not a slut for cheating on Beta Brad with Chad Thundercock, but actually I'm the victim and therefore everyone else will treat me better. Mmmh, I'm so oppressed. I'm not a rich stacy that's never been told no in her life, and never felt an ounce of true loneliness or want, because not only am I too selfish and uncaring to be thankful for what I have, but my own fucked up worldview relies on convincing myself that all the people I hurt deserve it because they were born more privileged than me, even though my life is objectively better in every conceivable way. Oooh it's so good!."
You understand everything but you still call everyone who agrees with you Neo-Nazis. You realize that the same people who told you to call us Neo-Nazis think you are too, right? The very views you shared in that post are exactly why they call us Neo-Nazis, and you are no different.