Your Royal Majesty, King of /monarchy/ May we have the >>1413 Cross of Burgundy as a Spanish Empire flag?

Also, if you add the Spanish Empire flag, could you add the 2nd Mexican Empire flag too?

>>1438 I think there is that Mexican poster that likes Emp Maximilian I and other apologists in general. They should get a flag.

Claude de Seyssel's La Grande Monarchie de France: https://www.google.com/books/edition/La_grande_monarchie_de_France/_69hAAAAcAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1

Cambridge, Corpus Christi College, MS 415 The Norman Anonymous: https://parker.stanford.edu/parker/catalog/nr257ff7994 Norman Anonymous blog: https://conclarendon.blogspot.com/2013/10/the-norman-anonymous-tract-on-christian.html https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Anonymous

English historical documents: https://books.google.com/books?id=lkDVJp4QEQUC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false https://books.google.com/books?id=Gft-OruM_noC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false https://books.google.com/books?id=dL12K__XzoAC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false

>>1460 Pretty much my ideal for an American monarchy. I actually wrote about something similar in a thread before, minus democracy and constitution, but I'm not American so...

>>1466 Cute girl and nice dubs. I just wanted to say that.

>>1466 I just want to eat you up. Libertarianism is nice and actually the rights guaranteed in the constitution are more important that democracy nya~

>>1451 If that's the case, I will also go shill the board my hardest.

>>1451 Okay, I went and advertised. But it is difficult for me because half the royalist community blacklisted me (no joke). >>1453 /monarchy/ general is a good place to start because it's not always political here. You could simply have a conversation or talk about a monarch you like... like your favorite Roman Emperor.

>>1454 Forgot to mention. By OC I mean it's just a lazy pallete swap. Original pic.

>>1456 How many years have you been posting here now, diaperfag?

>>980 This is why I like libertarian constitutional monarchy with electoral cognatic succession. The Empress/Queen Regnant would basically just serve as decision maker of last resort and last arbiter of justice when contracts are broken. The only democracy is when you give everyone who is a subject the right to vote for the next Queen from among the Queen's daughters. Furthermore, there would never be any question as to wether a child is illegitimate, as the monarch is female nya~

>>1457 Part of the Queen's duties as head of state would include reproducing with Eugenically high quality men. Those that possess wisdom, intelligence, beauty, and strength—in that order. Perhaps the subjects could elect men to the Queen's harem, while giving the Queen the final choice as to what man of the harem pleases her at any given moment nya~

>>1458 The members of the Queen's harem could also function as her advisors. In this way the people would have some input on the make up of the apex of society while stability is maintained nya~

Is this how low /monarchy/ has fallen?

>>1432 >shitposting is grounds for lament

>>1432 It can always get worse.

>>1001 Why did the Brazilian Empire fall nya~?

>>1442 >>1443 Wow, nice to see you again, nya fag. I lost you after meguca went down.

>>1442 Every country should have its own Hong Kong tbh.

>>1387 Maybe make the font bigger so that it's visible even without expanding the thumbnail? Maybe a background? Transparent images here are completely broken.

>>1324 >I always felt that pic 2 looked like Grace had Christ-chan lobotomized She doesn't look any more lobotomized than Grace does. They both have low-detailed generic faces.

>>1188 >expecting any quality discussion on a board that still concerns itself with plebeian "freedom"

>>1211 It's a uniform thread, simple as.