/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Where lolis are free speech and Hitler did nothing wrong

Index Catalog Archive Bottom Refresh
Mode: Reply
Name
Options
Subject
Message

Max message length: 8000

Files

Max file size: 32.00 MB

Max files: 5

Supported file types: GIF, JPG, PNG, WebM, OGG, and more

E-mail
Password

(used to delete files and postings)

Misc

Remember to follow the rules

The backup domain is located at 8chan.se. .cc is a third fallback. TOR access can be found here, or you can access the TOR portal from the clearnet at Redchannit 2.0.

Maintenance Postponed

8chan Ultimatum - Volunteers Needed
Modeling, Voice Acting, and Animation


8chan.moe is a hobby project with no affiliation whatsoever to the administration of any other "8chan" site, past or present.

Be sure to visit /polarchive/ for file libraries Remember to archive all links, and videos should be attached to posts or using a front end

(254.76 KB 969x1566 TAKE ACTION v6.png)

Address rampant anorectal violence & misinformation! NOW! Anonymous 07/10/2021 (Sat) 08:03:04 Id: 000000 No. 9993
Blatantly injurious erotic anoreceptive violence—behavior involving a combination of rapid thrusting, considerable girth, and a prolonged duration—is rampant worldwide, facilitated by widespread (willful) ignorance, apathy, and misinformation. It is impossible for resultant anorectal injuries and serious/chronic/permanent health consequences to be uncommon due to anorectal fragility relating to anatomy and neuromuscular physiology [References: Anorectal Risks 1-3]. Hence, when more than one person is involved such violence should constitute a severe crime for any penetrative person. Pornography featuring that violence can have numerous effects on some viewers: inspiring them to emulate what they see, even using coercion; conditioning them to be aroused by suffering; and contributing to development of related mental pathology: sexual sadism disorder, sexual masochism disorder, and perhaps even psychopathy for younger individuals [References: Trends & Associations]. People with those inclinations are having a field day with such violence and spreading disinformation. That unrestrained hedonism is promoting societal decadence. This is happening because the vast majority of humanity likely will never place a high value upon the good health of at least someone else's anus; too many people do not wish to think seriously about anorectal matters even though the anus is one of our most important body parts. Erotic anoreceptive activities therefore must be universally discouraged, and perpetrators of anorectal violence against another person—at least and especially ones who inspire countless others—must face justice by any means necessary. Justice has not been served in far too many cases, and it may be out of governments' hands after too much time has passed. People within governments worldwide who are or were in a position to dispense justice yet failed must be held accountable as well.
Reminder that OP is a fag who sticks dildos up his ass, and didn't think this would cause issues
(1.42 MB 2560x4096 anorectal risks 1.gif)

(1.55 MB 2560x4096 trends & associations.gif)

Blatantly injurious erotic anorectal violence—anoreceptive activity involving a combination of rapid thrusting, considerable girth, and a prolonged duration—is rampant worldwide, facilitated by widespread (willful) ignorance, apathy, and misinformation. It is impossible for resultant anorectal injuries and serious/chronic/permanent health consequences to be uncommon due to anorectal fragility relating to anatomy and neuromuscular physiology [References: Anorectal Risks 1-3]. That is why perpetration of such violence against one or more others should be considered severely criminal behavior. Pornography featuring that violence can have numerous effects on some viewers: inspiring them to emulate what they see, even using coercion; conditioning them to be aroused by suffering; and contributing to development of related mental pathology: sexual sadism disorder, sexual masochism disorder, and perhaps even psychopathy for younger individuals [References: Trends & Associations]. People with those inclinations are having a field day with such violence and spreading disinformation. That unrestrained hedonism is promoting societal decadence. This is happening because the vast majority of humanity likely never will place a high value upon the good health of at least another person's anus; too many people do not wish to think seriously about anorectal matters despite the fact that the anus is one of our most important body parts. Erotic anoreceptive activities therefore must be universally discouraged, and perpetrators of anorectal violence against another person—at least and especially ones who inspire countless others—must face justice by any means necessary. Criminal justice has not been served in far too many cases, and it may be out of governments' hands after too much time has passed. People worldwide who are or were in a government position with jurisdiction to uphold that justice yet failed must be held accountable as well.
(1.47 MB 2560x4096 anorectal risks 2.gif)

Traumatic risks of human anoreceptive activities include inflammation; abrasion and tearing; muscle and connective tissue damage; and colorectal perforation. Sequelae may arise, such as hemorrhage/hematoma, hemorrhoidal disease, ulceration, bacterial infection followed by abscess / fistula / life-threatening systemic sepsis, rectal prolapse, fecal incontinence, anal skin tag (remnant of external hemorrhoidal thrombosis, scar tissue from a healed tear, or a sentinel tag for a chronic anal fissure), and anatomic stenosis (narrowing due to constricting scar tissue). One instance of trauma can lead to multiple complications. Cumulative damage and preexisting conditions are concerns too. ~2cm beyond the anal opening at the pectinate/dentate line, the epithelium transitions from stratified squamous (anoderm) to simple columnar in part of the narrow surgical anal canal, continuous with the rectum. This very fragile mucosal lining is easily damaged especially if its mucus barrier is removed by an enema or otherwise impaired. Furthermore, some enemas and lubricants can inflame the lining and even cause it to slough off. Since injury to anorectal mucosa alone is painless due to a lack of somatic innervation, resultant problems may remain undetected with no obvious symptom(s). Neuromuscular physiology as well contributes to anorectal fragility particularly for girthy and vigorous insertions, which are objectively foolish and very likely to be significantly injurious. The involuntary internal anal sphincter relaxes with rectal distension. The puborectalis and external sphincter completely relax when a person bears down, causing hemorrhoidal cushions to engorge and become more susceptible to injury by shear (frictional sliding) force. The internal hemorrhoidal cushions also lack somatic innervation.
(1.47 MB 2560x4096 anorectal risks 3.gif)

(1.53 MB 2560x4096 prolapse & incontinence.gif)

• Strong, repeated shear (frictional sliding) force in the anal canal is likely to permanently damage supporting tissue of the internal hemorrhoidal cushions at the least, leading to internal hemorrhoidal prolapse (progressively worsening with cumulative damage from repeated trauma). Damage to one or more of the internal hemorrhoidal cushions elicits no pain sensation due to their lack of somatic innervation. As healthy internal and external anal cushions help to maintain fecal continence with a watertight seal, anal canal deformation due to their disease or removal can result in fecal incontinence (FI). Furthermore, pulling or traction on nerves in the anorectal region can potentially lead to neuropathy and associated FI. • Internal rectal prolapse (IRP), aka rectal intussusception, is a common finding among asymptomatic individuals. Strong, repeated shear force in the rectum probably does contribute to development of full-thickness external rectal prolapse (aka procidentia) particularly when IRP is present. Internal hemorrhoidal prolapse—among other conditions—also may contribute to rectal prolapse development. FI can be a consequence of rectal prolapse as well. • Stretching the anal canal with girthy insertions is likely to disrupt or fragment one or both anal sphincter muscles, possibly without pain as the internal anal sphincter muscle also lacks somatic innervation. Such damage results in permanent muscle weakening and is associated with FI especially with a damaged or dysfunctional puborectalis muscle. Stretching the anal canal repeatedly with insertions of progressively increasing circumference may cause cumulative muscle damage. • Trauma—including anoreceptive trauma—can instigate development of numerous other anorectal conditions that may lead to FI, such as a fistula. Additionally, surgical treatment for anorectal conditions can contribute to development of FI. [Medical references: Prolapse & Incontinence]
(1.45 MB 2560x4096 anatomy & trauma.gif)

The human anus when closed at rest should resemble an anteroposterior slit surrounded by shallow, semi-symmetrical, radial perianal skin folds. Healthy perianal skin commonly has a different, typically darker, color due to physiologic hyperpigmentation. Anorectal trauma can result in persistent, externally-visible changes to the anus and its surroundings. Potential consequences include the anal orifice shrinking or becoming misshapen due to constricting scar tissue formation, the perianal skin folds disappearing due to underlying anal sphincter damage, and one or more lumps appearing (e.g. an anal skin tag, prolapsed internal hemorrhoid, or thrombosed/diseased external hemorrhoid). If the perianal skin folds remain, pruritus and/or cutaneous thickening may result in exaggerated skin folds. [Medical references for paragraphs 1 and 2: Anatomy & Trauma] A (strong) sexual fetish must be satisfied for sexual arousal, and a fetishist with partialism obsesses usually over a non-sexual body part[1]. A human anus resembling the anatomical ideal at rest has symmetrical features; symmetry is one aspect that humans consider when evaluating beauty[2]. Partly due to common prejudices against and denigration of the anus along with rampant, anus-mutilating erotic anorectal violence, developing an aesthetic anus fetish is highly unusual; and _accepting_ it, even moreso. This fetish does indeed seem to be very rare: otherwise that violence would have strong opposition. Some malicious people (such as sexual sadists and sadistic psychopaths) pretend to have such a fetish—and will even praise a clearly damaged/diseased anus typically without being challenged—because doing so facilitates and perpetuates anorectal violence. 1. "The DSM diagnostic criteria for fetishism." Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2010 Apr; 39(2): 357-62. PMID 19795202. doi:10.1007/s10508-009-9558-7. 2. "Symmetry, beauty and evolution." Nature. 1994 Nov 10; 372(6502): 169-72. PMID 7969448. doi:10.1038/372169a0.
(105.90 KB 1046x1068 anal insanity 2015.gif)

(87.03 KB 1041x745 anal insanity 2016.gif)

(145.23 KB 1017x801 anal insanity 2017.gif)

(144.09 KB 1120x870 anal insanity 20190115.gif)

(228.02 KB 1138x1192 reddit.gif)

Logically-fallacious diversionary tactics: • A red herring is a tangential topic introduced as a distraction. Trying to create an unrelated discussion about a messenger or claimant (e.g. by introducing alleged personal attributes or asking about unstated opinions) is one _very_ common example. • An ad hominem logical fallacy involves arguing or implying that at least one supposed attribute of a messenger or source somehow affects the validity of one or more claims presented when any such characteristic is completely irrelevant — and this is nonsensical for cases in which information originates from others. (Sometimes such characteristics can be relevant: For example, it may be appropriate to question someone's honesty when she makes a claim about herself or her own experiences. However, the anecdotal evidence logical fallacy could be a better angle.) • Misrepresentation—introducing a distorted version of something presented—is another form of red herring. Attacking a fabrication as a means to suggest refutal of what was actually presented constitutes a straw man logical fallacy. (A refutation featuring one or more vague, sweeping claims with no proof provided may be related. The burden of proof rests on the claimant, so offering constructive criticism is a good idea.) It is suggestive of a nefarious agenda and/or psychopathy to purposely and repeatedly try to divert attention away from anorectal anatomy and physiology, rampant anorectal violence, associated traumatic risks, and an epidemic of ignorance and misinformation. These topics, along with the voluminous amount of information from others, are so much more important than anything about one lone person trying to draw attention to them. Certainly pornography industries would be foolish not to take full advantage of psychopaths as deceitful and manipulative "psyop" agents when some pornography companies already utilize them for perpetration of violence against one or more others.
As of 2021/11/22 and for far too many years prior, several related English Wikipedia articles have had major & inexcusable flaws, including these: • The article about the human anus has an image of a human female's anus and perineum that probably were damaged by some kind of major trauma. Biological human females beyond developmental stages in the womb should lack an obvious perineal raphe (seamlike union/ridge) in the anogenital region between the anus and the vagina; the bulbospongiosus muscle is separated in them and does not form a persistent, externally-visible midline raphe as it may in biological males [References: Anatomy & Trauma]. Furthermore, the article about the perineal raphe claims otherwise with no support from any cited source. • The article about simple columnar epithelium explains nothing about its fragility and (at least in the anorectal region) lack of somatic innervation. The article about anal sex ... • lacks even one _scientific_ opposing perspective, giving readers without exposure to balanced sources the impression that opposition is limited to irrational religious positions. One such scientific perspective: The human anorectum is very unsuited for many all-too-common receptive activities due to the region's anatomy and physiology. The single short-term benefit, _potential_ pleasure, is greatly outweighed by the many short- and long-term health risks to a receptive person. [Rationale: Anorectal Risks 1-3] • fails to mention the normalization of injurious anorectal violence in pornography featuring real people. • does not account for the ambiguity of the term "hemorrhoid," which can refer to pathology or normal anatomy. • contains a logically-fallacious appeal to nature: "natural" is not necessarily good or desirable, nor is "unnatural" necessarily the inverse. Those flaws contribute to rampant anorectal violence and misinformation facilitating it.
(162.59 KB 620x558 ernie_rants.jpg)

OP IS A FAGGOT WHO LIKES PENIS IN HIS ASSHOLE, AND WON'T STOP SPAMMING THIS SHIT EVERYWHERE He's even hitting small, obscure chans on Tor with this shit. It's either a bot, or someone with MAXIMUM AUTISM. (or someone else reposting it because they think "HURRRRR DURRRRR, IT FUNNY COPYPASTA") Either way, his parents failed, by not beating enough.
>>12998 Why do you think I keep merging the threads?
>>13006 How about deleting the threads and banning the spam entirely.
(663.95 KB 540x360 smug select.webm)

>>13007 That wouldn't solve anything as the guy is posting from Tor, so all he would really need to do is just reset his ID continue posting it. So, honestly, it takes the same amount of effort to delete his posts as it would to merge the threads. However, merging does have the advantage that we can eternally laugh at the fag for being so retarded in the first place.
(571.29 KB 1020x2706 TAKE ACTION v3.png)

Logically-fallacious diversionary tactics: • A red herring is a tangential topic introduced as a distraction. Trying to create an unrelated discussion about a messenger or claimant (e.g. by introducing alleged personal attributes or asking about unstated opinions) is one _very_ common example. • An ad hominem logical fallacy involves arguing or implying that at least one supposed attribute of a messenger or source somehow affects the validity of one or more claims presented when any such characteristic is completely irrelevant — and this is nonsensical for cases in which information originates from others. (Sometimes such characteristics can be relevant: For example, it may be appropriate to question someone's honesty when she makes a claim about herself or her own experiences. However, the anecdotal evidence logical fallacy could be a better angle.) • Misrepresentation—introducing a distorted version of something presented—is another form of red herring. Attacking a fabrication as a means to suggest refutal of what was actually presented constitutes a straw man logical fallacy. (A refutation featuring one or more vague, sweeping claims with no proof provided may be related. The burden of proof rests on the claimant, so offering constructive criticism is a good idea.) It is suggestive of a nefarious agenda and/or psychopathy to purposely and repeatedly try to divert attention away from anorectal anatomy and physiology, rampant anorectal violence, associated traumatic risks, and an epidemic of ignorance and misinformation. These topics, along with the voluminous amount of information from others, are so much more important than anything about one lone person trying to draw attention to them. Certainly pornography industries would be foolish not to take full advantage of psychopaths as deceitful and manipulative "psyop" agents when some pornography companies already utilize them for perpetration of violence against one or more others. cb3b5c6f3b9128a85fa94f5ffc55ee18
(570.29 KB 984x2725 TAKE ACTION v3.png)

Logically-fallacious diversionary tactics: • A red herring is a tangential topic introduced as a distraction. Trying to create an unrelated discussion about a messenger or claimant (e.g. by introducing alleged personal attributes or asking about unstated opinions) is one _very_ common example. • An ad hominem logical fallacy involves arguing or implying that at least one supposed attribute of a messenger or source somehow affects the validity of one or more claims presented when any such characteristic is completely irrelevant — and this is nonsensical for cases in which information originates from others. (Sometimes such characteristics can be relevant: For example, it may be appropriate to question someone's honesty when she makes a claim about herself or her own experiences. However, the anecdotal evidence logical fallacy could be a better angle.) • Misrepresentation—introducing a distorted version of something presented—is another form of red herring. Attacking a fabrication as a means to suggest refutal of what was actually presented constitutes a straw man logical fallacy. (A refutation featuring one or more vague, sweeping claims with no proof provided may be related. The burden of proof rests on the claimant, so offering constructive criticism is a good idea.) It is suggestive of a nefarious agenda and/or psychopathy to purposely and repeatedly try to divert attention away from anorectal anatomy and physiology, rampant anorectal violence, associated traumatic risks, and an epidemic of ignorance and misinformation. These topics, along with the voluminous amount of information from others, are so much more important than anything about one lone person trying to draw attention to them. Certainly pornography industries would be foolish not to take full advantage of psychopaths as deceitful and manipulative "psyop" agents when some pornography companies already utilize them for perpetration of violence against one or more others. df3a37ffd09f7f4490a267d56df7b9bd
>>13094 I could swear we already have this thread...
>>13095 Please review commentary in that thread to understand why I am no longer posting in it. See also: >>>/site/4460
>>13096 >Actually complaining on /site/ about this Well, now we know that it's autism that's driving this retard.
>>13096 Yeah that's kinda gay bro, I mean this is /pol/ You gotta expect a certain amount of fucking with you to occur, especially if you just straight up broadcast the fact that you have no sense of humor. Lighten up a little.
(678.34 KB 1225x3314 TAKE ACTION v3.png)

(The following has been included in every variant of TAKE ACTION for quite some time now. It's posted as text for emphasis. Note that this was posted as a new thread; the 8chan.moe /pol/ board owner, based on past experiences, ignores what was written below and tries to merge new threads of mine into an old thread in which that board owner modified the original post with disinformation about me.) Logically-fallacious diversionary tactics: • A red herring is a tangential topic introduced intentionally as a distraction or inadvertently. Trying to create an unrelated discussion about a messenger or claimant (e.g. by introducing alleged personal attributes or asking about unstated opinions) is one _very_ common example. • An ad hominem logical fallacy involves arguing or implying that some supposed attribute(s) of a messenger or source somehow affects the validity of one or more claims presented when any such characteristic is completely irrelevant — and this is nonsensical for cases in which information originates from others. (Sometimes such characteristics can be relevant: For example, it may be appropriate to question someone's honesty when she makes a claim about herself or her own experiences. However, a better idea may be to mention the anecdotal evidence logical fallacy, i.e. favoring some personal anecdote(s) over evidence based on science and logic.) • Misrepresentation—introducing a distorted version of something—is another means of creating a diversion. Attacking a fabrication in order to suggest refutal of what was actually presented constitutes a straw man logical fallacy. (A refutation featuring one or more vague, sweeping claims without proof may be related. The burden of proof rests on the claimant.) It is suggestive of a nefarious agenda and/or psychopathy to purposely and repeatedly try to draw attention away from anorectal anatomy and physiology, rampant anorectal violence, associated traumatic risks, and an epidemic of ignorance and misinformation. These topics, plus the voluminous amount of information from others, are far more important than anything about a lone person trying to raise awareness of them. It is very likely that pornography industries utilize psychopaths as deceitful and manipulative "psyop" agents when some pornography companies already make use of them for perpetration of violence against one or more others.
Maybe its a good thing that porn-stars should suffer and be degraded. It should be more extreme and pay less. Wanna be a star? Take three nigger dicks in your asshole, get pissed on, and we'll give you a coupon for denny's. I agree with all the facts you present, but you are basically defending pornography and trash women. Sex and violence is evolved among fast life history strategists (i.e. sub-humans). Being receptive to violent sex is promotion of "barbarian males" that will conquer other tribes. Submission to violence = survival of species. (this is were rape fantasy comes from) These women don't deserve status or sympathy because their genetics lead to primitive polygamous high rape societies full of violent retards (like islam). Also, I'm willing to bet jews are going to turn against billie eilish after recent statements condenming porn.
>>13317 Merged
(671.34 KB 1225x3291 TAKE ACTION v7.png)

>>13317 > the 8chan.moe /pol/ board owner, based on past experiences, ignores what was written below and tries to merge new threads of mine into an old thread in which that board owner modified the original post with disinformation about me. Well, I see that that abuse of power continues, and for now so shall my creation of new threads. Anyway: >>13323 > Maybe its a good thing that porn-stars should suffer and be degraded. You're welcome to your own opinion. Whether pornstars deserve suffering or not, though, plenty of people do get ideas from pornography and try to or actually do emulate what is in it, even using coercion. In fact, pornography is serving as a substitute for sexual education in many cases (especially among younger people). You might want to consider that. > It should be more extreme and pay less. There are various criminal legal concepts that may apply when significant injury to one or more others is a potential or actual result. It could also be argued that they _should_ apply—most especially where for-profit pornography is concerned—worldwide, retroactively, without limitation, and with severe punishment of perpetrators of that violence for reasons covered by both the "justice" paste (top of TAv3) and the "decadence" paste (top of TAv7). > you are basically defending pornography and trash women 1. Once again, ultimately this is not about me. 2. You are putting words into my mouth and then attacking straw men: (a) Nowhere was pornography defended. It was pointed out that there are problems both with pornography production and with pornography consumption. (b) Nowhere in what I posted were women "trashed" by me. I may have my own thoughts about them, but those are completely irrelevant. Furthermore, there are some male victims as well, especially among the homosexual/bisexual crowd. > Submission to violence = survival of species. (this is were rape fantasy comes from) There might be something to that when submission could mean survival rather than death. As noted by a study* quoted in Trends & Associations: "Sexual masochism disorder is considered the most prevalent paraphilia among women." * "Is There a Relationship Between Borderline Personality Disorder and Sexual Masochism in Women?" Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2017 Apr; 46(3): 747-754. PMID 27600835. doi:10.1007/s10508-016-0834-z.
This takes some serious dedication. I respect you, OP.
OP IS A HOMOSEXUAL WHO SHOVES LARGE OBJECTS UP HIS RECTUM >13335 No one cares. Suggestions: Take it to /b/ Take it to /x/ Take you meds. Shizopost elsewhere, faggot. OP IS A HOMOSEXUAL WHO SHOVES LARGE OBJECTS UP HIS RECTUM
(634.34 KB 1225x3291 TAKE ACTION v7.gif)

New Year's Resolution #1: Be much, much noisier. New Year's Resolution #2: Be much, much more disruptive. Here's a preview below. > Due to its ubiquity in pornography, several generations now have grown up masturbating to, demanding more of, and seeking to emulate violent behavior that should easily be considered severely criminal when more than one person is involved. Perpetrators of such violence against one or more others going unpunished is a major problem, as is incriminating evidence being sold for profit. Those perpetrators are rewarded, encouraged, and celebrated when they should instead face justice and be condemned. Why is this shit allowed to continue? Kids shoot up schools, killing innocents. We need to have "porn shootings;" if someone wants to throw their life away, they could at least try to take out the trash while doing so. Governments worldwide could use some "housecleaning" as well. Anyway, to reiterate... Logically-fallacious diversionary tactics: • A red herring is a tangential topic introduced intentionally as a distraction or inadvertently. Trying to create an unrelated discussion about a messenger or claimant (e.g. by introducing alleged personal attributes or asking about unstated opinions) is one _very_ common example. • An ad hominem logical fallacy involves arguing or implying that some supposed attribute(s) of a messenger or source somehow affects the validity of one or more claims presented when any such characteristic is completely irrelevant — and this is nonsensical for cases in which information originates from others. (Sometimes such characteristics can be relevant: For example, it may be appropriate to question someone's honesty when she makes a claim about herself or her own experiences. However, a better idea may be to mention the anecdotal evidence logical fallacy, i.e. favoring some personal anecdote(s) over evidence based on science and logic.) • Misrepresentation—introducing a distorted version of something—is another means of creating a diversion. Attacking a fabrication in order to suggest refutal of what was actually presented constitutes a straw man logical fallacy. (A refutation featuring one or more vague, sweeping claims without proof may be related. The burden of proof rests on the claimant.) It is suggestive of a nefarious agenda and/or psychopathy to purposely and repeatedly try to draw attention away from anorectal anatomy and physiology, rampant anorectal violence, associated traumatic risks, and an epidemic of ignorance and misinformation. These topics, plus the voluminous amount of information from others, are far more important than anything about a lone person trying to raise awareness of them. It is very likely that pornography industries utilize psychopaths as deceitful and manipulative "psyop" agents when some pornography companies already make use of them for perpetration of violence against one or more others.
(540.31 KB 1225x2532 TAKE ACTION v1.png)

Yet again for emphasis — Logically-fallacious diversionary tactics: • A red herring is a tangential topic introduced intentionally as a distraction or inadvertently. Trying to create an unrelated discussion about a messenger or claimant (e.g. by introducing alleged personal attributes or asking about unstated opinions) is one _very_ common example. • An ad hominem logical fallacy involves arguing or implying that some supposed attribute(s) of a messenger or source somehow affects the validity of one or more claims presented when any such characteristic is completely irrelevant — and this is nonsensical for cases in which information originates from others. (Sometimes such characteristics can be relevant: For example, it may be appropriate to question someone's honesty when she makes a claim about herself or her own experiences. However, a better idea may be to mention the anecdotal evidence logical fallacy, i.e. favoring some personal anecdote(s) over evidence based on science and logic.) • Misrepresentation—introducing a distorted version of something—is another means of creating a diversion. Attacking a fabrication in order to suggest refutal of what was actually presented constitutes a straw man logical fallacy. (A refutation featuring one or more vague, sweeping claims without proof may be related. The burden of proof rests on the claimant.) It is suggestive of a nefarious agenda and/or psychopathy to purposely and repeatedly try to draw attention away from anorectal anatomy and physiology, rampant anorectal violence, associated traumatic risks, and an epidemic of ignorance and misinformation. These topics, plus the voluminous amount of information from others, are far more important than anything about a lone person trying to raise awareness of them. It is very likely that pornography industries utilize psychopaths as deceitful and manipulative "psyop" agents when some pornography companies already make use of them for perpetration of violence against one or more others.
(678.34 KB 1225x3314 TAKE ACTION v3.png)

A new revision of the references compilation should be finished soon. >>13354 > New Year's Resolution #1: Be much, much noisier. > New Year's Resolution #2: Be much, much more disruptive. Here's a preview below. Also, I probably will drop the "shortjustice" paste that's currently included in TA variants 1 & 2. That's the "justice" paste without the third paragraph calling for justice by any means necessary, holding current and former government officials accountable for failing to serve justice when they are or were in a position to do so, etc. Due in part to that failure realistically there will be no true justice without bloodshed; that's just a fact of life at this point when in some cases we're talking about violent crimes committed DECADES ago by serially violent criminals such as Rocco Siffredi. Thanks to the internet greatly facilitating the spread of pornography (among many other things such as misinformation and disinformation), such crimes continue to inspire many people to this day. I shall update the hit list paste as well. Currently it says "These people, among many others, need to die." Technically we all need to die; no human lives forever as yet. So, here is what the new wording may be: "These people, among many others, must be killed for justice to be served."
(671.34 KB 1225x3291 TAKE ACTION v7.png)

>>12075 > These people, among many others, need to die: > • Rocco Siffredi, plus many more violent criminals like him who perpetrated brutal anorectal violence against many others > • John Stagliano, along with many other criminals like him involved in Evil Angel and similar companies worldwide (LegalPorno springs to mind): anyone doing one or more of aiding and abetting violent criminals, profiting from their crimes, and directing their actions > • Kamala Harris, California's Attorney General for many years: Did she do _anything whatsoever_ to rein in California's out-of-control pornography industry? It doesn't seem so. > • Xavier Becerra, another former California AG (now heading the U.S. DHHS, which oversees the NIH, despite having no public health nor medical background); Gavin Newsom, California's current governor; and Jerry Brown, California's former governor: See above. > • Anyone who was involved in the 2008 obscenity prosecution idiocy against Evil Angel, which just made things worse — and I wouldn't put it past the likes of the George W. Bush administration to have desired such an effect. Who in the FBI was involved? Who was involved at higher levels, up to and possibly including Bush & Cheney? They all need to die. > • Stephanie Dunn (California & Maine), one administrator of AdultDVDTalk (username "Janitor," formerly "Steph"): aiding and abetting violent criminals and their crimes (and likely profiting from them as well) While I'm no Trump fan, Jan 6th would be a very fitting day for assassination of Gavin Newsom, Kamala Harris, Xavier Becerra, and plenty of other politicians in bed with Hollywood (and by extension California's pornography industry) such as Joe Biden. Far too many people are masturbating to, taking lessons from, and even emulating incriminating evidence of violent crimes. Why does it seem as if very few care about this? A great number of people should be up in arms about it. They should be addressing these matters seriously and effectively. So, where is the action?
>>13462 > While I'm no Trump fan, Jan 6th would be a very fitting day for assassination of Gavin Newsom, Kamala Harris, Xavier Becerra, and plenty of other politicians in bed with Hollywood (and by extension California's pornography industry) such as Joe Biden. To be clear, I'm not sure that Becerra has or had Hollywood connections. The others most certainly did in the past and probably still do.
(678.34 KB 1225x3314 TAKE ACTION v3.png)

Address rampant anorectal violence along with factors facilitating it. NOW!
(671.34 KB 1225x3291 TAKE ACTION v7.png)

Get going already. Blatantly injurious erotic anorectal violence—anoreceptive activity involving a combination of rapid thrusting, considerable girth, and a prolonged duration—is rampant worldwide, facilitated by widespread (willful) ignorance, apathy, and misinformation. It is impossible for resultant anorectal injuries and serious/chronic/permanent health consequences to be uncommon due to anorectal fragility relating to anatomy and neuromuscular physiology [References: Anorectal Risks 1-3]. That is why perpetration of such violence against one or more others should be considered severely criminal behavior. Pornography featuring that violence can have numerous effects on some viewers: inspiring them to emulate what they see, even using coercion; conditioning them to be aroused by suffering; and contributing to development of related mental pathology: sexual sadism disorder, sexual masochism disorder, and perhaps even psychopathy for younger individuals [References: Trends & Associations]. People with those inclinations are having a field day with such violence and spreading disinformation. That unrestrained hedonism is promoting societal decadence. This is happening because the vast majority of humanity likely never will place a high value upon the good health of at least someone else's anus; too many people do not wish to think seriously about anorectal matters despite the fact that the anus is one of our most important body parts. Erotic anoreceptive activities therefore must be universally discouraged, and perpetrators of anorectal violence against another person—at least and especially ones who inspire countless others—must face justice by any means necessary. Criminal justice has not been served in far too many cases, and it may be out of governments' hands after too much time has passed. People worldwide who are or were in a government position with jurisdiction to uphold that justice yet failed must be held accountable as well.
>>13600 You know the BO is just gonna fuck with you again. Why not post this on one of the gay boards? >>>/cb/
>>13601 > Why not post this on one of the gay boards? You, or anyone else for that matter, are welcome to do so. Anyone could take some or all of that information from others I've dug up and use it how ever they wish or post it where ever they wish. Posted elsewhere recently: $ unzip -l "/tmp/TAKE ACTION v7.png" Archive: /tmp/TAKE ACTION v7.png warning [/tmp/TAKE ACTION v7.png]: 600064 extra bytes at beginning or within zipfile (attempting to process anyway) Length Date Time Name ——— ———- —– —- 249344 1980-01-01 00:00 TAKE ACTION v7+refs.txt ——— ——- 249344 1 file $ bc <<< "600064 / 512" 1172.00000000000000000000 $ dd skip=1172 if="/tmp/TAKE ACTION v7.png" of="/tmp/TAKE ACTION v7+refs.zip" > 1980 I use a metadata scrubbing program.
>>13600 wasn't there some homo who did a blog about this? I thought I had it bookmarked, but when I went looking for it to post on some Twitter thread I had no luck.
>>13608 He's been doing this for months. Pick ANY post.
(678.34 KB 1225x3314 TAKE ACTION v3.png)

I can not emphasize the text below strongly enough. Logically-fallacious diversionary tactics: • A red herring is a tangential topic introduced intentionally as a distraction or inadvertently. Trying to create an unrelated discussion about a messenger or claimant (e.g. by introducing alleged personal attributes or asking about unstated opinions) is one _very_ common example. • An ad hominem logical fallacy involves arguing or implying that some supposed attribute(s) of a messenger or source somehow affects the validity of one or more claims presented when any such characteristic is completely irrelevant — and this is nonsensical for cases in which information originates from others. (Sometimes such characteristics can be relevant: For example, it may be appropriate to question someone's honesty when she makes a claim about herself or her own experiences. However, a better idea may be to mention the anecdotal evidence logical fallacy, i.e. favoring some personal anecdote(s) over evidence based on science and logic.) • Misrepresentation—introducing a distorted version of something—is another means of creating a diversion. Attacking a fabrication in order to suggest refutal of what was actually presented constitutes a straw man logical fallacy. (A refutation featuring one or more vague, sweeping claims without proof may be related. The burden of proof rests on the claimant.) It is suggestive of a nefarious agenda and/or psychopathy to purposely and repeatedly try to draw attention away from anorectal anatomy and physiology, rampant anorectal violence, associated traumatic risks, and an epidemic of ignorance and misinformation. These topics, plus the voluminous amount of information from others, are far more important than anything about a lone person trying to raise awareness of them. It is very likely that pornography industries utilize psychopaths as deceitful and manipulative "psyop" agents when some pornography companies already make use of them for perpetration of violence against one or more others.
What I don't get, is the assumption that any of us are having sex.


Forms
Delete
Report
Quick Reply