>I said that both men and women should be held equally responsible for a crime i.e murder.
Except they shouldn't be, because it's the jew's fault for manipulating the woman and the men's fault for not protecting her from the manipulation.
>Let's look back at your previous post shall we
It's called a joke, dingus. Is this your first day here or something? But also, saying they're not people, even saying they are inferior, would not be blaming all of them. But no, if you want me to make explicit, without jokes, my actual complaint, it's that people like you have made women, to use their terminology, privileged, and despite you saying you don't want to do this, you then repeatedly advocate for it. I'd like to be treated equally, I would, but people like you have taken that option off the table.
>What else is funny for all the complaining you do about women you certainly want to be treated like one.
I don't complain about women, I complain about the way they're allowed to act, and how they are openly given more power and less responsibility. So yes, obviously I'd like to be treated like that. Again, you try to shame someone for not wanting to be a second class citizen, but if you just stepped outside your own shoes for a moment you'd see how ridiculous that is.
>I'm just not blind enough to see that it's the Jews that are the ones pushing this system not women.
Yet a large number of women are the willing tools, and you are refusing to hold them responsible. A large number of men are willing tools of this system as well, including yourself. Believe me, I hold you just as responsible as the rest of them.
You also fail to understand I'm not just talking about crime, though that is a significant factor. They also get preferential treatment by just about every organization on the planet, including governments. More benefits, easier access to jobs, more difficulty getting fired, etc. And by you absolving them of all responsibility for everything they do short of murder, saying that anything they do isn't really their fault, but rather solely the fault of jews, as if women are literal mindless automatons, you are supporting this system, and also acting a lot more like a sandnigger than the "enlightened european" you want to portray yourself to be.
>in court, in court, in court
Notice you have to significantly narrow the argument to point to a tiny area where you agree with me that men shouldn't be second class citizens, as if that will get me to ignore all the other areas where you openly want men to be nothing but beasts of burden that live to serve their female overlords.
>women aren't suitable for combat
I wasn't just talking about combat, but I think you aren't either. I understand that the things you're talking about extend to other fields as well, which legitimizes your point. Fair enough. Of course, all you're doing is acknowledging that the majority of them are useless parasites. You just want to use more polite language than me, so that you can justify giving those parasites much better lives than their hosts, who you want to act as beasts of burden.
>You know what's funny about this he contradicts himself in the same post
>"You're an idiot that actively argues and acts against his own self interest"
There is a difference between honor and being a cuck. There's a difference between supporting your kids and supporting your wife's kids. There's a difference between a mutually beneficial relationship, and just being a proud beast of burden for collection of parasites that don't care if you live or die. Actually, scratch that. They do care. They'd prefer if you died.
>since they birth children
That's not enough. If that's all they're good for, then that should be acknowledged, and they should just be made into breeding machines and sex toys. If they want to be treated like people, then they should be given the responsibilities of people. Either option is fine with me, but you want to give them the best of both worlds and the worst of none. Though frankly, even if I were them I'd be fine with either option. Of course, I have a sense of fairness, which most women, and most cucks like you, seem to lack.
>The parents should be the one raising his children if he fails to raise his children then that's on the parent. The system is responsible of course but so is the person that's putting them into that system.
This has practically nothing to do with my argument that you say it's replying to. So much that I don't even get what point you're trying to make. Are you saying it's your fault if some bitch takes your kids away from you? Seems like something you'd agree with since you think they're inherently better at raising kids (stats show otherwise) and shouldn't have responsibility for their own bad actions as long as they're not outright crimes (because morality is based on legality, apparently). Or maybe you're trying to argue that you should blame their parents for raising them wrong in the first place. Sure. I'd agree. That doesn't contradict my point at all that it's stupid to support a system where practically every woman is a slut/whore. You can pretend yours isn't. We've all met many men who try to pretend like that. But maybe your woman will be different. Maybe you'll be the lucky one. Maybe you'll be the one alpha chad that gets a wife that hasn't only decided to marry after riding the cock carousel for so long that her bodily fluids have been replaced by semen and the pleasure centers of her brain are blown out by endorphin overdose, so she can't even feel pleasure from you anymore. But oh wait, you're on fucking 8moe. You're betabux at best, and you know it. And even if you weren't, your chances of being that chad would still be astronomical.