/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Where lolis are free speech, ponies scare the feds, and Hitler did nothing wrong

Index Catalog Archive Bottom Refresh
Mode: Reply
Name
Options
Subject
Message

Max message length: 8000

Files

Max file size: 32.00 MB

Max files: 5

Supported file types: GIF, JPG, PNG, WebM, OGG, and more

E-mail
Password

(used to delete files and postings)

Misc

Remember to follow the rules

The backup domain is located at 8chan.se. .cc is a third fallback. TOR access can be found here, or you can access the TOR portal from the clearnet at Redchannit.

Maintenance is currently underway and the site may be up and down for a little while.

8chan.moe is a hobby project with no affiliation whatsoever to the administration of any other "8chan" site, past or present.

All links to external sources should be archived, and relevant videos should either be in ".webm" format or used through a front end such as https://instances.invidio.us/

Women are Literally Big Babies Anonymous 05/30/2020 (Sat) 14:30:09 Id:11a2e2 No. 467
Men throughout history have observed that women never become as mature as men do, forever being stuck in an awkward stage between adult and child. Schopenhauer famously remarked on this, to cite one particularly poignant example in his essay “On Women”. I feel that the recognition of this is a key component of the final redpill. Women are just big babies, and should be treated as such for the entirety of their lives. The only way to resolve the woman question is to put women back in diapers, stop their nagging with a pacifier and provide them entertainment truly suitable to their nature such as princess cartoons and toys. All women shall become the “little princesses” of their man, who shall be caretaker and husband. Women shall be happy, pampered and carefree. The Natural Order shall be restored.
>>467 Has there ever been a mostly successful female world leader?
>>469 The fact that you have to ask that question provides the answer.
>>469 Idk but some popular names are Cleopatra Queen Elizabeth the somethingsomething idk how successful they were
>>473 >two names Into diapers they go
Based and diaperpilled
>>467 >Women shall be happy, pampered and carefree. Spoke like a true simp. Women shall be forever enslaved. Either that, or completely replaced by artificial tools for procreation. Being a slave to women's demands is out of the question. Never be a simp. Never pander to women. If they can't be forced back into slavery, they must be genocided and replaced by better tools.
>>467 and what part of this has to do with you posting your nasty fucking fetish porn? i thought so, fuck off.
(1.76 MB 854x480 diaper.gif)
>>715 > Either that, or completely replaced by artificial tools for procreation Spoken like a true Jew
>>725 >muh everyone is a jew. The internet was created by jews. And it is a technological tool created to replace natural personal interactions among people. Will you stop using it completely then? Fuck off with your simping attitude. Any natural tools (like women) that can't be improved must be replaced by better, artificial, tools.
>>725 What anime?
>>731 >The internet was created by jews. t. jew No it wasn't. That's like the claim jews made computers. Jews can only abuse things created by others. Guess what: Jews didn't invent usury, money or gold. Not even interest rates.
>>715 >they must be genocided and replaced by better tools. >being such Jew that he can't appreciate women
>>742 t. simp. Guess what? Worshiping women is the same as worshiping jews. >>743 >complains about jews. >worships women, who are the exact same kind of parasite.
>>744 >Having respect for your mother and wanting to protect them and keep them happy is Jewish and worshipping them. This is the dumbest logic I've read today you sound like a true faggot, the more you hate women the more homosexuals you attract you fucking retard. How can you conclude all women are evil and destroying society when Jewish men are mainly the ones doing so tor nigger. >Simp As always a new dumbass buzzword for retards on the internet to use ignorantly so they can just insult other instead of making any sense of their arguments.
>>760 t. woman
>>765 You didn't refute to what he said like a retard? Are you gonna admit that women are smarter than you faggot?
>>766 Women are meant to be controlled. The reason why they are so terrible in todays society is because they cant be controlled anymore. They're naturally evil, but that's okay but good and evil are meant to coexist. Women are indeed giant babies, they evolved to be this way. It's the jewish brainwashing that convinced them to destroy femininity within them. Women are an important part of the duality of nature. Their natural instinct to breed and nurture is invaluable. This is why women are important. No matter how dumb, mehcanically impaired, or truth deprived they are, they still serve an important purpose. This is why women are important. Wake up; the women you see today is not the real representation of feminine beauty.
(548.00 B 15x8 ghst .png)
>>473 >Cleopatra pretty sure she was fucking awful and mismanaged her territory. Something along the lines of being roman and larping egyptian then the mismanagment and being a terrible mother on top of it all, also a whore for one of the emperors and contributing to the fall of the roman empire.
>>760 >yo mama Are you a nigger? All you're doing is advocating for being a slave to women, while women then get to be a decadent master class. They are biologically necessary for procreation at the moment, and men instinctually enjoy them, but throughout history that has been used as an excuse to make men into their slaves. And it's largely men enforcing it. If you enjoy women, as all non-retarded men do, then fine. They should be kept as pets. Throughout history, women have used men as hated beasts of burden. Cuckservatives embrace this as if it's a good thing, ignoring that most of the males throughout history have failed to pass on their genes, while their great grandmothers were just fucking the milkman anyway. I think OP is slightly off. Women shouldn't be treated like big babies. They should be treated like service animals. I wouldn't go so far as to say beasts of burden, because men inherently like them. But men must temper this inherent enjoyment of them with the responsibility to enforce women's responsibility, since they will not do it on their own. Women should be treated well, as they not only serve narrow purposes when trained correctly, but they are enjoyable to be around. They should be treated like pets, but with jobs. Like a police horse, or a seeing eye dog.
>>760 stop moving the goalposts. The post you're replying to said "worshipping" not "respecting" or "protecting". I can respect and protect my cat without actually worshipping my cat.
(2.27 MB 4004x2480 christmas.jpg)
>>805 >They should be treated like service animals That's not cute though
>>1030 uwu
>>1030 >seeing-eye-dogs aren't cute Naw. Service animals are loved like pets, not just used like beasts of burden, but they also have a responsibility that they must fulfill. They contribute to society, unlike women.
>>1030 >ywn put your girlfriend in diapers and give her a nice sippy cup and pacifier WHY LIVE
>>469 acctually yes but they are a minority >>470 the only answer it provides is the quality of burger education >>473 adding Ekatherine I to that list >>715 lmao >>731 jew
>>469 Catherine the great?
>>467 So you're saying humanity should go extinct?
>>1262 He never said not to fuck them.
>>1265 He said they are literally big babies. Those are self-evidently not for fucking, Unless you're a degenerate of course.
>>1262 >>1265 >>1266 It's just some diaper fetish faggot trying to spread his disease here on /pol/. Next time you examine the letters more closely and don't bump a god damn scat thread.
>>784 >being Roman The Ptolemies were Greek, you fucking moronic zoomer.
>>467 The best male-female relationships are either Mother-Son + SEX or Father-Daughter + SEX and these relationships do not have to be biological. Try to prove me wrong if you can. Every other male-female relationship is fraught with tensions due to uncertainty as to who is in charge. Females despise males that are not in the dominant 'Father' role. The only exception is found in the Mother-Son relationship. Society should be reorganised such that the only accepted male-female relationships are Mother-Son and Father-Daughter, incest should be legalised, and adoptions should be made easy. There is no reason to oppose incest except for reproductive incest... and only if you support Eugenics in either a libertarian or national socialist society nya~
>>1303 >There is no reason to oppose incest except for reproductive incest They'd have no children and thus bring no value to society similar to faggots. Your board is dead as fuck too.
(83.54 KB 1280x720 43rt.jpg)
>>469 >>473 Hard not to sound biased but I would say Queen Elizabeth 1st was one of the most succsesful women leaders ever. She inherited a country in a mess and left it as one of the most feared counties in the world. While ushering in one of the greatest era's of literature in history. And maybe her success was the fact he was able to see a great man who could get shit done when she saw one, her spy master, Francis Drake etc. Sadly as history has shown these kind of women are very rare.
>>1397 Elizabeth I was just lucky that bad weather obliterated the Spanish Armada and the most powerful navy in the world, otherwise she would have been destroyed and Brits would be speaking Spanish instead of Arabic right now.
(119.70 KB 630x434 657.jpg)
(40.95 KB 640x436 546.jpg)
>>1408 Bad weather did not help till much later. UK ships were just out gunning Spain's because Spanish ships were fitted with land cannons. UK had designed the 4 wheeled cannon to be used on ships and praticed everyday. Spanish two wheeled land cannons proved to be slow to use along with they all had different ball sizes while the new UK cannon all used the same ball..
>>1409 There's been a couple of good female rulers. However they all had one thing in common. They never let their pride get the better of them and mostly relied on men to help them. The only exception I can think of in that regard is Hatsheput mainly because we have less knowledge about that time period. I think it's retarded to blame women for everything honestly. It's just another divide and conquer strategy used by Jews. Sure women can claim some responsibility but so can men for not stopping this shit in the first place.
>>805 good post
>>1410 isnt that the whole thing tho, men have to do everything and women benefit, they are nice to have socially and like, thats it. Women are like (that word used to describe jobs such as art/music/dance, non essential stuff that comes with culture, which notably women love to be a part of)
>>1422 >women are nice to have socially Sure thing, doubleposting faggot.
I get that you have a fetish, but it's asinine to try to push that on literally everyone
(91.82 KB 1186x634 chop.jpg)
Daily reminder that misogyny is kosher because hot women are a threat to (((arranged marriages))) and (((inbreeding)))
>>1428 Your disagreement with that one point that he allowed his opponents only means that you actually agree with his actual point even harder. I don't understand why you'd be mad about that. >>1440 Hot women are a threat to everything. So are ugly women. And average women. They must be controlled, and cucks must not be tolerated, for they are the ones that hand over their power to the women that then misuse it.
> All women shall become the “little princesses” of their man, who shall be caretaker and husband. Women shall be happy, pampered and carefree. The Natural Order shall be restored. read the play A Doll's House by Heinrik Ibsen. It came out in the late 1800s so you can't claim it's woke. I don't respect women either but he puts forth a pretty decent case that actually trying to live like you describe is pretty fucked up and a fantasy for the man
>>1446 It's completely fucked up because it just means the man is a beast of burden, living only to serve the woman, and the woman contributes nothing but her own existence.
>>1422 Woman's purpose is to give birth and nurture the child, man's purpose is to keep them safe and healthy. Anything else only contributes to the insanity.
If you think so poorly of women, then in what way are you different from all the disgusting man-hating feminists and cavemen-mudslimes? You don’t sound like white european people to me.
>>1513 No, because we have actual arguments, stated in this thread. Also, muslims love women. They put those rules there for the stated purpose of the protection of women. Muslim women wear ninja outfits because muslims believe that men are so beastly that if they see an inch of a woman's skin they'll go mad and turn into rape machines. Feel free to make actual arguments if you like. So far, you have not. What you're doing is the equivalent of... >feminists say 2+2=5 >you say 2+2=4 >see? You're both saying 2+2 equals something! You're just like feminists! The sad part is that I would have agreed with you at one point. All I really wanted was equality. I would still love equality. Feminists have made clear that they will not allow that to happen. They will not learn, they will not start acting like actual people. They have proudly shown that they will continue to act like hateful parasites and pretend that I am a monster for being forced to give my life for them (through taxes at the very least, assuming the draft never comes back), like I am privileged for objectively being treated like a second class citizen, with objectively fewer rights, and open hatred from every major organization in society. I would love equality. But they won't let it happen. They are determined to stop equality, because they are not people. They lack basic human traits like empathy, which is why they always talk about things like "representation." They cannot relate to anyone that isn't very similar to them. They openly say they cannot relate to anyone without a vagina. But I can relate to them. Unfortunately, the result when I do is just relating to sociopathic parasitism.
I did not read a single logic argument here. Just irrational accusations and dumb claims without reasonable explanations. You sound like pathetic crying losers. You all saying that white women should be treated like niggers, camels, slaves, arab hijabis and orthodox kikes. Guess what. This is not european. This is not our culture. Please educate yourself and read about how the ancestors lived throughout history and stay the fuck away with your dumb, unsophisticated, primitive jewish goat fucker nigger philosophy. ridiculous faggots
>>1515 >niggers, camels, slaves, arab hijabis and orthodox kikes. False. I was saying that women should be treated like service animals, like seeing eye dogs, or police horses. This is different from beasts of burden, like camels, or niggers.
If you think, it’s a good idea to treat the person you have sex with, like an animal, then you are promoting a primitive desert goat fucker lifestyle that has nothing to do with civilized white peoples. But what else can I expect from Americans and Canadians. Your whole continent is a prime example of what happens, when uprooted, displaced people mix together and create a degenerate nigger mass culture.
>>1521 >If you think, it’s a good idea to treat the person you have sex with, like an animal First of all, cool it with the commas. Secondly, learn to reply properly. Third... >person There's your problem. They aren't people. I wish they were, too, but they're not. They don't act with humanity, and when you get to know them, all you learn is that they don't even have real personalities. You might think they do, but just keep watching one for a prolonged period of time, and you'll see her get completely reprogrammed every time she starts getting new cum injections, which is much more often than cucks like you will accept. And even that isn't even sincere, since really they just pretend to like whatever advances their social status at the moment. It's sad, because when they're young, they act very much like people, and do have personalities, but as they reach puberty, they lose all their likes and interests and begin dedicating all of their existence to parasitic hedonism. >German calling Americans and Canadians degenerate Hilarious. I mean you're not wrong that they're degenerate too, but you really should be careful in your glass house over there.
(236.32 KB 528x750 1588403097269.png)
I just leave this image here. Is diaper an European style?
But yet they've managed to control the men pretty much completely. Nice accomplishment for the big babies.
>>1546 Babies control adults because adults are hardwired to take care of them, due to babies being useless, yet necessary for the continuation of your genes. Women are much the same, only they are only useless because betas serve them while allowing them to be useless. Women shouldn't be parasites, but betas allow them to be. Instead they should be service animals. They must be controlled and trained to make sure they do their jobs correctly, but they can do jobs. Feminists and betas think they do jobs now, but all they do is destroy every workplace with gossip, metoo, and changing rules to cater to their whims instead of catering to efficiency.
>>1515 I can't decide if they are just beta losers larping as "evil nazis" because they are attracted to the villaneous aspect that jews created around National-Socialism or if they are glowniggers spreading poison. Regardless, anyone who believes European women are anything but extremely important members of society should be shot. Hitler himself said that men and women complete each other need each other, the fact that Western women have been turned into abominations due to decades of jewish influence should not be used against them and it angers me that anyone would think we should treat white women like sandnigger females.
>>1554 If you read the bible like I do then it actually gives you the purpose of women right then and there. They’re support. It’s as simplistic as that. The people who advocate for women being nothing more than sex toys are nothing more than fetishists who get off to humiliation. It’s the same reason why shit like cuckholdry is watched. The only difference is you’re the one humiliating rather than being humiliated it’s cut from the same cloth. What would happen when a man was feeling sick and couldn’t provide for his family? His wife would take his place until he got better. Women are only whores now because of the weakness of the men they are surrounded by.
>>1513 >then in what way are you different from all the disgusting man-hating feminists and cavemen-mudslimes? let me break this down: >what way are you different from all the disgusting man-hating feminists We don't hate men. >cavemen-mudslimes? muslims hate gays, too. so I guess we should love faggots or we'll be just like them. Oh wait, but the feminists love fagots, so I guess we'd be just like them if we loved them too! See how this works? don't let your enemy define you, and don't define yourself as merely the opposite of some other group. Female slavery is not unique to muslims, and there is far more to muslims than their laws regarding females, but the primary problems of muslims is that they are largely not white, it's not islam that us the threat to us, but arabs and niggers. There are a lot of things you can agree with your enemy on, such as with my example of them hating gays. I don't hate gays nor do i love them, I think they are mentally ill, and their illness has both in utero factors (antigen exposure) and environmental factors (being sexually abused), this means that we don't have to kill them, but we should look to treatment (psychiatric, not religious) over the current approach of "acceptance" and mainstreaming. This position may have some commonalities with the perspective of muslims on the subject, but it is my own position. Similarly, I propose simply making it so that only living white male humans have rights, and that the law only give official recognition to the sentience and suffering of living white male humans. Anything that is not a living white male human, will have no rights, and it's sentience and/or suffering (if it truly possesses either) will not be officially recognized by the law. The entity can be kept as property by legally recognized persons (living white male humans), and in such cases, will be legally protected by the property laws of their owners. As the law does not apply to these entities, the owner be legally accountable for the actions of his property, and as these entities cannot claim to own anything, anything possessed by an entity that is owned property will actually belong their owner under the law. Aside from these exceptions, the laws will be the same as for any other form of property: The owner will not be restricted by law in what he can do with his property, nor will he be legally restricted in what he can consent for another legal person to do with his property. This includes the right to damage or destroy their property at will.
>>1554 >the fact that Western women have been turned into abominations due to decades of jewish influence should not be used against them and it angers me that anyone would think we should treat white women like sandnigger females. Sandniggers treat women much too well, because sandniggers are animals that think if they see a woman's cheekbones they'll go mad with lust and become rape machines. Sandniggers make women dress like ninjas not to control women, but to control men, because they think so little of men that they think they must be controlled this way. It aligns precisely with feminist thinking, which is just one more reason feminists support them. I would like to believe it is only western women that are this bad, but tradcuck societies are no better. They still expect men to give their lives, frequently literally, for women, while women are expected to do nothing but take the resources their men earn and distribute them among their family. Then they have the nerve to consider that work. Women think taking care of their family is work. Men work just for the opportunity to get to take care of their family. Taking care of their family is the reward. >>1555 >Women are only whores now because of the weakness of the men they are surrounded by. Because the men allow it, yes. But it's not just an individual man's choice. Change starts at home, yes, but when society is against you, your individual power is not enough. Too many men give women too much power, and those men must be stopped.
>>1550 >Women shouldn't be parasites, but betas allow them to be. Instead they should be service animals. They must be controlled and trained to make sure they do their jobs correctly, but they can do jobs Again, funny how it's the opposite that has happened and it's the men who have turned out to be women's "service animals".
>>467 cybersmith?
>>1558 There is no question in my mind that you are the stereotypical frustrated loser whose hate for women come from your own inability to fornicate as much as the other degenerates in your school aand grew mad with envy. Of course men are expected to die for their women, because that is what we have been doing since the beginning of human history. Not because Jews told us to, but because it's common sense. It's like you never had a mother, a sister, a wife, you absolute nigger. Men are expected to die for their women because they are weak and can't defend themselves. This is natural, and it would still be the case even if society found their sanity again and didn't allow them to participate in male affairs such as politics.
>>1563 >There is no question in my mind that you are the stereotypical frustrated loser whose hate for women come (sic) from your own inability to fornicate as much as the other degenerates in your school aand (sic) grew mad with envy. Not an argument. >Of course men are expected to die for their women, because that is what we have been doing since the beginning of human history. Just because things were done in the past doesn't mean they are right. You are literally advocating for being a second class citizen, for your life literally being worth less. You go so far beyond cuckoldry I don't even know what to call it. >Not because Jews told us to, but because it's common sense. I never claimed it was because jews told us to. If they did or didn't doesn't affect its validity. >It's like you never had a mother, a sister, a wife, you absolute nigger. >argument is just a slightly more verbose "yo mama." >calls others a nigger >Men are expected to die for their women because they are weak and can't defend themselves. False. They just tell you that so that you will serve them. Especially since we have weapons. Moderate differences in average strength potentials are moot in modern society. But not only do you defend them, you advocate for society giving them more power than you, and then act proud to be a beast of burden. >This is natural, and it would still be the case even if society found their sanity again and didn't allow them to participate in male affairs such as politics. Unfortunately, men like you ruin things, yes. We must not only control the women, but eliminate the white knights like you.
>>1572 Not him but here’s my retort. >Just because things were done in the past doesn’t make them right You are literally advocating for being a second class citizen, for your life literally being worth less. You go so far beyond cuckoldry I don't even know what to call it. Considering you think that if men protect women and put themselves at risk we suddenly become worthless, I’m going to assume you’re an atheist. Here’s my retort. It doesn’t fucking matter, because your life would still be worthless even if you had complete dominance over women. Why? Because if you’re an atheist you believe in nothing greater. Which ultimately leads to a worthless existence. > False. They just tell you that so that you will serve them. Especially since we have weapons. Moderate differences in average strength potentials are moot in modern society. But not only do you defend them, you advocate for society giving them more power than you, and then act proud to be a beast of burden This is dumb, You’re entire argument boils down to “you’re a slave to women if you die for them” Let me ask you something then? Who births the children? Obviously women. Next question would you be willing to die for your child? > Unfortunately, men like you ruin things, yes. We must not only control the women, but eliminate the white knights like you. We don’t need to control women all we need to do is hold them responsible for their actions like men are held responsible.
>>1573 >Considering you think that if men protect women and put themselves at risk we suddenly become worthless I didn't say worthless, I said worth less. Men's lives, both in modern degenerate societies as well as tradcuck societies, have always been considered expendable. They have always been objectively considered to be worth less than women's lives, and as such, they have always been told it is their responsibility to give their lives for women. >argument about atheism Different topic. Not going to let you deflect and get us off topic here. The fight against feminism is much more important in the current zeitgeist than fighting about religion. >Let me ask you something then? Who births the children? Obviously women. Almost always irrelevant. And defending pregnant people (which yes are always women) is different from defending women in general. One is under a medical condition which does sometimes prevent it from doing certain things, and may need certain degrees of help. The difference is that you want to give more help than is needed, when and where it isn't even needed. >Next question would you be willing to die for your child? Yes, but not just on the whims of my child, if my child was being selfish and just demanding I serve and die for him for the hell of it. You spoil women, and if your analogy is being a parent, then you'd be a terrible parent, with spoiled children. >We don’t need to control women all we need to do is hold them responsible for their actions like men are held responsible. I'd like to agree. I'd like to live in that world. Unfortunately, there are some fundamental problems, which result in women and white knights not allowing us to have that world. Fundamentally, both women and men show bias favoring women. Men like you, advocating for giving your life for women, while women aren't expected to do anything except sit there and occasionally be pregnant. You advocate for their parasitism, and this naturally leads to them not being held responsible for their actions like men are held responsible. You advocate sacrificing yourself, and demand other men sacrifice themselves, for "people" that would, except maybe in incredibly rare exceptions, never sacrifice themselves for men. Arguing that they physically can't is simply disingenuous, since we aren't literal cavemen, and the moderate differences in peak physical performance are not relevant to most aspects of modern life, and women aren't pregnant all the time. Of course, even pregnancy doesn't affect their ability to do most modern tasks, until the very end of the pregnancy. They even claim this, as an excuse to get into the workplace, which then they destroy, as they turn around and say they need to be treated special, immediately after saying they need to be treated equally.
>>1575 When you fight against womens rights and want to cancel the social history of the last 150 years, then you have to accept that you are advocating for gender roles, that are declared obsolete in the modern world. That means, you have to be cool with men taking responsibility for their women, families and nations. Therefore you have no right to call women selfish parasites and to complain about your duty to defend your family and people. Choose between modern individualism and traditional collectivism, but do not demand rugged, selfish individualism for men and slavery for women. Pick one side but don't be an inconsistent opportunist. Complaining about women being charakterless big babys and wanting them to be your serve animals does not fit together. But besides that, its people like you who pretend to be redpilled, but advocate for jewish modern propaganga of degenerate hyperindividualism that destroyed western civilisation and makes us white people look like weak degenerate nigger bastards without ideals, relationships and national consciousness. Soldiership and martyrdom has always been an ideal of masculinity and instead of being proud of it, you cry like a pathetic faggot. You are the male equivalent of aggressive ugly feminists who refuse their natural role as a mother because they feel oPpReSsEd
>>1576 >When you fight against womens rights and want to cancel the social history of the last 150 years, then you have to accept that you are advocating for gender roles, that are declared obsolete in the modern world. I would love nothing more than equality. But feminists refuse to let that happen. So fine, if they want gender roles, I at least won't support the ones they want. If they want to enforce roles, I won't just support them as they enforce roles that lets them be selfish parasites while men are treated as hated beasts of burden. Your problem is that you can only imagine current roles, and can't imagine the possibility of other roles. >You are the male equivalent of aggressive ugly feminists who refuse their natural role as a mother because they feel oPpReSsEd You are the male equivalent of the slave that snitches on the other slaves and thinks he's better because he gets to be boss nigger, just ignoring the fact that he's still a slave.
>>1262 No, I'm saying they should be diapered and babied throughout their lives. It's cute and women are finally put in their place by men.
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
>>1607 >what part of this has to have you spamming your nasty fucking fetish porn what part of this has to have you spamming your nasty fucking fetish porn >what part of this has to have you spamming your nasty fucking fetish porn what part of this has to have you spamming your nasty fucking fetish porn >what part of this has to have you spamming your nasty fucking fetish porn what part of this has to have you spamming your nasty fucking fetish porn >what part of this has to have you spamming your nasty fucking fetish porn what part of this has to have you spamming your nasty fucking fetish porn >what part of this has to have you spamming your nasty fucking fetish porn what part of this has to have you spamming your nasty fucking fetish porn >what part of this has to have you spamming your nasty fucking fetish porn what part of this has to have you spamming your nasty fucking fetish porn >what part of this has to have you spamming your nasty fucking fetish porn what part of this has to have you spamming your nasty fucking fetish porn >what part of this has to have you spamming your nasty fucking fetish porn what part of this has to have you spamming your nasty fucking fetish porn
>>1577 Never play your enemies game. This entire thing is to divide us. Remember the ones who control the feminist movement are the Jews. While I don't believe equality is necessarily possible. I do believe that men and women shouldn't be elevated above the other. Both of us have a specific purpose. Men are the protectors and women are the supporters. This is what people need to realize. What a women is is to replace the man when something has happened. Say you run a shop and you get sick. You're wife would probably take up the mantle and help while you're sick and when your healthy again she goes and raises the children, makes food etc. Women make it easier for a man to focus on specific issues like work and politics rather than being bogged down by things like children. This is my view. Equality is false. However, treating women as if they are nothing more than sex slaves is also false. Treating women like their worthless and only for the desire for men's pleasure is the obvious signs of a weak man. It's why we are in this current situation. Men are lying around willy nilly with any women they can get their hands on. Obviously this is because of the sexual revolution which has completely destroyed the world. Also >>1576 yes the world should return before 150 years. Women weren't treated as nothing more than sex toys back then. Heck women even wrote literature. The problem is letting them get away with things without any sort of punishment. Feminism is promoted by Jews and that's the main issue. >>1576 >individualism/collectivism This has bothered me entirely. If you think entirely about the collective then that whole NPC thing is basically completely true for everyone on the planet, It also completely dehumanises people. If you think in individualistic terms. Then Moral subjectivism is promoted which destroys the country via complete lack of human decency. It's a combination of the two you want. You want the individual to think of the collective and you want the collective to be open to individual thought. Basically one without the other will alway result in a clusterfuck also called modern society. Also weren't you the guy that was saying that God doesn't care about race in another thread? despite the fact that he has an entire chosen people, It's obviously not the Jews but that's a completely different story. That's promoting Jewish propaganda. I'll admit this whole women hating thing does feel suspicious but in that case it should be our duty to explore into things deeper and expose the people doing this shit. Not arguing amongst ourselves. Also using the term "redpilled" is dumb. The matrix was made by trannies. I've gotten sick of those buzzwords. Including shit like based, Simp etc etc. Can't people just talk normally without sounding like an immature brat. Finally just gonna say this. Everytime I've seen a women with a mongrel or with some shit skin then never face me straight in the face. You can tell they're ashamed they simply won't admit it because of the modern world reinforcing their position. They recognize their mistake far too late though. It's similar to how a lot of women that takes abortions commit suicide. Basically without men directly leading them women become miserable. It's just the fact that people think that if a women isn't automatically allowed to do whatever the fuck she wants too, becomes nothing more than a man's personal pleasure hole it becomes a problem. A women should be allowed to make some decisions as long as it doesn't threaten the community at large.
>>1609 >What a women is is to replace the man when something has happened. Say you run a shop and you get sick. You're wife would probably take up the mantle and help while you're sick and when your healthy again she goes and raises the children, makes food etc. Women make it easier for a man to focus on specific issues like work and politics rather than being bogged down by things like children. This is my view. Your view results in men breaking their backs to support women, while women, in almost all circumstances, just get to sit around and be lazy. Your view results in men being a servant class for women. >The problem is letting them get away with things without any sort of punishment. We agree on this, at least. I'm not advocating for treating women like they're useless, or only used for pleasure. I'm advocating for actually making them work and contribute. However, they have shown they will not do this without very tight control.
(351.57 KB 1080x1080 1558521606666.jpg)
(183.51 KB 800x542 typical counterstrike player.jpg)
>>1443 >Hot women are a threat to everything They're still just women. The power they have is the power you and others give them by being needy losers. If you are emotionally strong and keep your goal in mind, they aren't a threat. Bros before hoes. Ragheads only need to control their women because of (((poor self-discipline))) and (((no endgame))).
>>1609 >They recognize their mistake far too late though Once they're ruined and irredeemable.
>>469 Outside of monarchs. No.
Cursed thread. Women still are physically able of not shitting themselves, therefore no need for the diaper thing. You just have a weird fetish
>>467 A girl rejected me once. Then, I saw that other guys didn't get rejected by the girls that they liked. Because of that, I now put all my efforts into contributing to bring down the whole civilization, out of spite.
>>1951 The vast majority of other guys do get rejected by the girls they like. However, this should only strengthen your spite and will to bring down the whole civilization.
>>1952 >this should only strengthen your spite and will to bring down the whole civilization. Indeed. I was denied proper preparation to be successful with girls. Then, I see other guys being well prepared to deal with and be successful with girls. That makes me want to ruin as many lives as I can while I live, even if it ruins mine too. My goals in life are to ruin as many lives as I can, to teach as many young men as I can to do the same, and to manipulate as many girls as I can to do the same.
>>1953 There is little preparation that you could do. It's largely genetic. You have twice as many female ancestors as male ancestors, because, on a genetic level, women prefer to all share a chad rather than have a normal guy to themselves. (((The Media))) tries to promote the idea that men are the ones that dislike monogamy, but actual genetics prove otherwise. Women want harems, but this is not the path to a productive society, because women don't work, and if a man is cast aside due to not being a chad, he will have no motivation to work either. He will become lazy at best, destructive at worst. But so be it. If a society treats so badly the majority of its productive members, then it deserves to burn.
>>1964 I completely agree on all those points. And I would add that, even worse, women want harem's just to leech resources. So, not even the chads are what they desire, but anyone with resources that they can manipulate into wasting on them. The current situation of women seeking nerdy but rich guys is proof of that. As long as the guy have plenty of resources to be leeched, women jump in. So, not only the most productive guys are cast aside, but also the personal gain from productive ones are all wasted on lecherous women, rendering the whole point of being successful and prosperous useless. You won't get the women that you want, no matter what. And if you become successful, a large group of women that you don't want will come to you to leech off all the gains of your productivity. Society, indeed, deserves to burn.
>>1563 Listen here, you fucking chimp. Your country is basically an autonomous primate sanctuary. Your homicide rate is higher than your average income. Your main export is LiveLeak videos. You despicable macacos are so violent you even kill people with kites. I doubt you'll get the chance to reply to this post because you're statistically likely to be killed for your phone before you get the chance. You posted this from an internet cafe in rocinha. You fucking absolute monkey. How dare you attempt to communicate with humans. Go back to collecting trash with your carroça and never post here again.
>>1397 ol beth was pretty righteous innit?
>>1563 >Of course men are expected to die for their women And that is dumb. A man must self preserve above all things. Self preservation is more important than race and procreation. >because that is what we have been doing since the beginning of human history Then, men were dumb since the beginning of human history. But no more. This is the era when men started to become smarter and stopped dying for parasites such as women. >muh sex Brazillian, and with the lowest of IQ, caring about sex at all. No wonder you are just apes larping as white people. >because it's common sense >It is common SENSE to die and not sel preserve Indeed, low IQ ape who worships women. >because they are weak and can't defend themselves So what? That is their problem. Not ours. They are parasitic and must never be protected. >This is natural It isn't, you low IQ ape. Self preservation is natural. Individualism is natural. Sacrificing for the weak is unnatural. It is the behavior of the low IQ apes such as you. >it would still be the case even if society found their sanity again Men (that is, real, smart, men) are becoming sane: we are living for ourselves only, and not sacrificing for parasites such as women. Also, this anon: >>3730 is completely right. Your country is literally a laboratory filled up with living apes to be used to test anything that the elites around the world wants to test. Your women (including your mothers, your daughters, your sisters, your girlfriends and your wives) ALL prostitute themselves for us. We need to just show up, and they throw themselves at our feet, like the prostitutes that they are. We fuck all your women behind your back, and we give them nothing more than spare change. Your women are literally beggars and hobos that we use as quick entertainment, and abandon them soon after to let them go starve again for another month. All the while you work yourselves to death trying to not die from starvation, and still wasting your money on your prostitute mothers, prostitute daughters, prostitute sisters, prostitute girlfriends and prostitute wives that we all already fucked and took their virginity, leaving only used up carcasses for you as scraps. Your all are nothing more than zoo animals to us, human beings. You are not people. You are apes. You are not human. You are apes. You are Brazilian. You are apes.
(111.27 KB 1000x667 women.jpg)
>>1563 I'm the op of this. Stay mad at my vpns faggots, I'm not Hungarian either. Any culture that doesn't protect their women is a shitty one. I repeat, you are just losers who were mad jealous at the degenerates in your high school so now you larp as "villains" on the internet but if Stacey gave you a blowjob back then you would probably be browsing reddit and watching niggers play sports on tv.
>>4015 You aren't the one who decides anything. We will not protect women. We will abandon them to die. And millions are turning like us every day around the world. And there is nothing that you can do about it. Women are the villains, and they will be dealt accordingly.
This thread is terrible. Men need women to survive, as do men. All of you faggots with your femboy shit need to simmer down. Yes, women follow feminine nature, subservient in many respects to masculine nature. Does this make them inferior or needless to men and humanity as a whole? No.
It's also very clear from OP that this is a fetish thread. Outmost degenerate.
>>4096 Speak for yourself nigger. Who the fuck is providing internet to your mud hut, anyway?
>>4122 We take without giving back. Stay mad. We are millions, and our numbers increase daily. We won't protect any woman. We will abandon them all. And there is nothing that you can do about it. >>4116 >Men need women to survive Literally not. The species needs it. Not the individuals. Men are self-sufficient. We will live just fine. And if the races and the specie dies because of our abandonment of women, we don't care. We live for ourselves. Not for race, humanity, society, women or nation. >Yes, women follow feminine nature A subversive and deceitful nature. And that is reason enough to abandon them. > subservient in many respects to masculine nature. Does this make them inferior or needless to men? Yes. >humanity as a whole? No. But to hell with humanity. My life matters more than the preservation of humanity. I don't give a shit about what will happen to humanity after I die. I only care to live a good life, without parasites such as women or jews (the exact same parasite) being a part of it.
>>4324 I agree with your methods but want to point out that you could have an even better motivation: spite. You should care what will happen after you die. Namely, you should care that you have helped to eliminate the parasitism that brought you to this type of life in the first place. You seem to be on the right track. You might not realize it, but you're a hero, in your own small way. Cucks and whiteknights and those they work for are, of course, the villains. Even just your one small voice, your small acts of resistance, add up, and at least you aren't actively helping the villains, like so many others are.
maybe there is nothing women/girls can do that men/boys cannot do better, the only thing we really need the female half of the species for is incubation and reproduction, and we are already working on making them redundant there as well.
Not wanting women as a pet doll baby maker is gay. this thread is full of faggots that like men
>>4603 >Not wanting to be a slave makes one be a faggot Go get all women, tiger. Nobody is stopping you from that. We are the ones who quit the game. Oh, society cant exist anymore because we quit? Too bad. Oh, the human species may go extinct because we quit chasing women? TOO BAD. We don't care. Each one of us only cares about himself. Go save the world. And fail. I will stay here, living for myself and my individual interests only, while the human species disappears little by little every day. All of that is better than dealing with women. >>4542 This. And it is not "maybe". It is a fact. Women are useless, aside from reproduction. And we are making the artificial replacements for that, rendering women completely useless. Hey, simps. How it feels to know that your entire lives devoted to worshiping women and enslaving yourselves for social validation will amount to nothing in a very near and unavoidable future? Sucks to be you. We will either quit the game completely and live freely, or will procreate through machines. Either way, you will be regarded as the dumb cattle that threw your lives away to pander to parasites such as women.
>>4330 True. I act only on two motivations: freedom and spite. I want freedom for me, regardless what that costs for everyone else. and I support any action that goes against women, out of spite for their parasitism and falsehood. Their evil nature. Every single development and improvement that mankind makes in the direction of replacing women completely will receive my support. Directly or indirectly. Anything that makes the lives of simps, white knights, women worshipers and such, a literal hell on Earth, I will support fully. The only effort that I will ever put into anything regarding women will be towards their complete elimination and replacement.
>>1576 This. >>1577 >I would love nothing more than equality. If you want your people to die, sure, go ahead.
I'm beginning to notice that it's mostly Americans and Canadians complaining about women. Or should I say (((AMERICAN))) and (((CANADIAN))). To enslave women is pretty much declaring we are no better than the niggers/sandniggers of the world that any true /pol/ack would claim to hate. Women and Men are fundamentally different, However that doesn't mean that either or are inferior. We serve different roles and these roles are what men and women should hold as standards. Anyone who claims that a women is equal to a man in every way is stupid. Women birth children and the fact that's considered "Oppression" in this day of age is because men haven't been fulfilling their duty of protecting the borders. The truth is, Blaming women for our problems does two very specific things for the Jews because let's not kid ourselves that's who is spreading this anti women propaganda. 1 takes away blame from the Jews and 2 Makes men think they're blameless thus increasing hubris. Notice how these people use the same exact tactics leftists use, Just replace racist, sexist etc with simp, white knight etc. Don't fall for their propaganda anons.
>>4761 You're missing the point, anon. The fact of the matter is that currently, you are treated as a second class citizen, with objectively less rights, not to mention a society that openly hates you and then calls you an oppressor while openly hating you and discriminating against you. Your ideal, regardless of what anyone may think of it, isn't happening. At least not any time soon. For the time being, you simply have to stand up for your rights. You have no power to enforce your ideal or even to encourage it to any significant degree, because you are nothing more than a hated beast of burden, and have very little significant power over your owners. What some of the people in this thread are discussing is to use some of the power you do have productively. That is, to at least not actively support the system that has made you a hated beast of burden. You try to shame them, but they will feel no shame when the insults come from a person who is actively working for people who openly dispose him, and will dispose of him the moment he ceases to be useful to them, or perhaps sooner, simply out of spite. You don't like the term simp, or white knight? Fine. (I don't like simp either.. Here's another term for you: Boss Nigger. You think that by trying to shame the other slaves into working harder for the masters, you will gain a favored position, but your highest possible position is still a slave, just perhaps one with slightly more privileges than some other slaves. You're nothing but an aspiring Boss Nigger.
>>4762 You're not understanding me, The Jews are using propaganda not women, You're basically replacing women with Jews. The only difference is, The Jews actually are in power. You think only our women hate us? A lot of our men hate us as well, Like I said women are the only people you can place all your hatred towards. You people are Jews, It's completely obvious. Moreover my point completely flew over your head at the last part. I claimed you act exactly like leftists when you use those terms to shame the opposition. Changing the term and making a new one on the fly isn't an argument.
>>4324 >We live for ourselves. Not for race, humanity, society, women or nation. True
>>4766 >You think only our women hate us? A lot of our men hate us as well, You know this isn't what the people arguing against you think, since you're complaining about them talking shit about white knights, who are men. >Like I said women are the only people you can place all your hatred towards. First of all... >women >people Pick one. Secondly, I've already established that your premise that your opponents think women are the only bad ones is false. It's possible to acknowledge your point of other enemies while also acknowledging that you're a ridiculous cuck that openly works against his own self interest and tries to shame others for not willingly being slaves. >Moreover my point completely flew over your head at the last part. I claimed you act exactly like leftists when you use those terms to shame the opposition. Changing the term and making a new one on the fly isn't an argument. It's not for shame, it's to try to get through to you why your point is wrong. It's called an analogy. It's trying to get you to understand, from an outsider's perspective, just how ridiculous your actions actually are. You actively promote your own status as a second class citizen, and try to discourage people who don't do the same, as long as they're male. You can call whoever you want a jew. Try using an actual argument instead of trying to resort to ad hominem attacks or questioning motivation. Neither would discredit the actual arguments at hand. But these are also both doubly stupid attempts at arguments since your opponents have stated their motivations many times in this thread, so trying to question their motivation wouldn't take away from the motivations they've already stated. You'd need to state how those motivations don't work, and then how the strategies don't work. Jews are also a group that frequently promotes feminism, misandry, and the actual on-the-books laws and policies that openly make males into second class citizens. You are joining them in promoting these things. You must be a Jew, and therefore your arguments are wrong, right?
>>4770 >You know this isn't what the people arguing against you think, since you're complaining about them talking shit about white knights, who are men. No, I'll call out bullshit when I see it, Unlike you, I actually know that both sides should take equivalent blame for their crime. I.e a women and a man should be treated equally in court that doesn't mean they themselves are equal. While the world itself is run by Jews therefore they should held responsible for the reprobate propaganda being spread. Similarly the people who fall for the propaganda should be punished, That doesn't mean an innocent women or man should be punished. > Secondly, I've already established that your premise that your opponents think women are the only bad ones is false. It's possible to acknowledge your point of other enemies while also acknowledging that you're a ridiculous cuck that openly works against his own self interest and tries to shame others for not willingly being slaves. You claim I'm shaming others... yet you're the one using cuck in order to shame me to comply with your point of view? So you're a complete hypocrite. Good to know, But even then, Men protect women because they are defenseless and need to be shielded from outside threats. If we don't protect the borders then no one will. You don't even know the definition of the word cuck because it's literally letting your wife cheat on you, Or in this case it's if the men collectively decided to ignore their women and let them sleep with outside forces i.e we're literally being cucked right now on the national level because of people like you who are unwilling to lift up their arms. Then again claiming you are european race in any way is highly dubious. >The last bit My actions are completely justified, A man should give his life for a women, I know honor and dignity are probably completely alien to you, But the point of the matter is that to any sane European, Protecting the weak was a virtue, Now look where we are, An every man for themselves type of environment. Similar to what you're promoting except for men as the "privileged" class. Men are treated as second class citizen's now? Then why can black men get away with severe crimes with a slap on the wrist, Why do Jewish men get away with raping children? Why are muslim men aloud to behead people in paris? Why are sodomites celebrated instead of condemned if they were truly second class citizens? Why do trannies get a free pass? No only straight white men are "second class citizens" and the last people who are to blame for this is our own women. I.e you're literally deflecting the blame of the cause of all of our problems onto our women when they're the least responsible. You're a Jew because you act like one, Seriously what type of fucked up mind does it take to say that women aren't people >A hypocrite >Shameful behavior >No honor and dignity >Blind hatred of women when they are just as much apart of our race as the next man down the street. >Lumping every women as the same Give it up it's completely obvious. Also you then go on to say I support feminism? I don't, I never did, I said men and women have different roles in society and they should follow these natural roles in order to make society the best it possibly can be. That's already anti feminism but to you anything that supports women is feminism. Only a weak minded individual would think such a thing. Women need men to lead so they have good role models to follow, This is literally the basic role of life. A man leads and protects i.e how he works, rules, fights and defends his homeland etc, While a women nurtures the children and also supports the man by doing things he may have otherwise never had the time to do. My opponents are literally advocating the genocide of the people who propagate my own people. Why would I not fight against such a thing? Isn't that why most /pol/acks are here to begin with, To try and stop the genocide of the European populace? and again the only other people that are promoting this is Jews, It's literally white genocide under a different name. And no amount of mental gymnastics are going to change that. Their motivation is simply to make men hate their women by manipulating emotion like usual. It's unfortunate that I'm emotionally stable enough not to fall for such niggardly behavior.
>>4775 >Unlike you, I actually know that both sides should take equivalent blame for their crime. I'm claiming that it's not about "sides" it's about individuals doing bad things. For example, due to no girls being on the internet, I'm assuming you're male, but you're heavily to blame. I do not blame men as a group, but I blame men who act like you as a group. I also don't even blame all women, since there are certain ones that don't do these things, they're just rare. My only claim is that the system is established in such a way as to make males second class citizens, with actual laws on the books to establish that they are treated worse than females. You are actively supporting this system and telling others to follow you. >That doesn't mean an innocent women or man should be punished. Never claimed otherwise at any point. >You claim I'm shaming others... yet you're the one using cuck in order to shame me I'm the one actually using arguments. I'm not using it as a buzzword. You're an idiot that actively argues and acts against his own self interest, and then is proud of it. You are proud of propagating a system that hates you, of taking those that hate you and raising them above yourself. Just so happens that "cuck" is the perfect word for that. You can remove the word itself and focus on the meaning behind it. I'm not saying you're trying to shame others because you used a particular word. I'm saying it because your strategy is to try to demean others for not actively trying to raise women above themselves. You don't use arguments, you use ad hominem attacks where you call them sandniggers or jews, but don't actually deal with any arguments. Your argument is simply "you don't want to be a jew, do you?" This, of course, is not a real argument, just a shaming tactic. If you gave actual arguments, then threw in the fact that your opponents are jew-like, as a side detail, that would be a totally different matter. >But even then, Men protect women because they are defenseless and need to be shielded from outside threats. False. They've just never been given any large scale responsibility, so they never act on it. I know your argument is that men typically have more physical strength and stamina, but of course this isn't true across the board. Should we genocide men that aren't stronger than the strongest woman, in some sort of eugenics program? Perhaps, but I don't think that's what you're actually arguing. Especially because modern society rarely actually needs those of peak physical strength for day to day matters and typical jobs, and women are just as capable of using a gun, if trained correctly, so your argument that men must protect women is moot. You're right that if we don't protect the borders, then no one will. That's an argument against the typical woman, since most of them won't lift a finger to defend anything other than their immediate selves, even though they are perfectly capable of doing this with modern weapons and tactics. But they won't, because the majority of them are nothing but parasites. Perhaps it's more due to nature, perhaps more due to nurture. Either way, you shouldn't support the system that enables and encourages them to be parasites. >You don't even know the definition of the word cuck because it's literally letting your wife cheat on you Yeah, so have fun supporting a system where practically every woman is raised to be a slut/whore. Just shut your eyes and pretend you're not getting cucked. >Or in this case it's if the men collectively decided to ignore their women and let them sleep with outside forces Can't get cucked if you won't support the woman in the first place. >we're literally being cucked right now on the national level because of people like you who are unwilling to lift up their arms. This is a totally different conversation, and I don't think I disagree with you. I guess where I disagree is that you want to "lift up your arms" as in to work for the system that has created this situation in the first place. What you should be doing is taking up arms against the system. Hell, even just refusing to support the system is enough, because it can't survive without us, without cucks like you supporting a system that does nothing but use you and demean you. Without the work of these people, society couldn't function. And why would I want to support a society that only uses me and demeans me?
>A man should give his life for a women, Depends which one. I believe in the concept of self sacrifice. I also acknowledge that the vast majority of women aren't even close to worth it. >I know honor and dignity are probably completely alien to you >honor and dignity >from a guy who happily makes himself a second class citizen This is why you get called a cuck. It's not a buzzword, it's because you feel pleasure in being used and demeaned. If you had any dignity at all, you'd stand up for yourself, or at least stop hurting yourself. >Protecting the weak was a virtue It still is. Women aren't weak. People like you have effectively given women superpowers. They have the ability to destroy a man's life with nothing more than a thought. To make him disappear forever. You've made women into that kid from The Twilight Zone, only instead of sending men to The Cornfield, they send them to prison. >Men are treated as second class citizen's now? Yes. There are many actual laws on the books, cases which have set precedent, government programs and rules, which openly favor women over men, across practically every western country, and many non-western countries. We could also argue about things such as sentencing discrepancies, but those are at least a little debatable. Actual on-the-books policy isn't. >Then why can black men get away with severe crimes with a slap on the wrist, Why do Jewish men get away with raping children? Why are muslim men aloud to behead people in paris? Why are sodomites celebrated instead of condemned if they were truly second class citizens? Why do trannies get a free pass? You think women of those same groups don't get even more of a pass? You're comparing men to men and then claiming men can't be second class citizens because they have less rights than other men, ignoring the fact that those same men with "more" rights still have fewer rights than women. >No only straight white men are "second class citizens" and the last people who are to blame for this is our own women. I.e you're literally deflecting the blame of the cause of all of our problems onto our women when they're the least responsible. >least responsibile >except they overwhelmingly vote for it, vocally support it, etc. It's "not all women" but you're not even arguing about that, you're just absolving them of all responsibility, claiming they're manipulated. Why are they more absolved of responsibility for being manipulated than men? Oh right, because you simply think of them as better than yourself, as perfect innocent creatures that must be protected, and allowed to abuse you. >Seriously what type of fucked up mind does it take to say that women aren't people Where do you think you are? >>Blind hatred of women when they are just as much apart of our race as the next man down the street. >>Lumping every women as the same Never actually did this, just argued that they objectively have more rights, and the system teaches them to be bad people, so you're better off just removing yourself from the system as much as possible. >Also you then go on to say I support feminism? I don't, I never did, I said men and women have different roles in society and they should follow these natural roles in order to make society the best it possibly can be. That's already anti feminism but to you anything that supports women is feminism. Anything that supports women as being treated better than men is feminism. That's what you are doing. You don't think you're a feminist, but you are. The term for this is "tradcuck." Go ahead and break your back to support "your woman," while "your woman" is fucking the milkman anyway. >While a women nurtures the children and also supports the man by doing things he may have otherwise never had the time to do. ie: while a woman does practically nothing except turn your children against you, until you find out the kids weren't even yours to begin with, because while she was lounging around all day, using up the resources you break your back to earn, she was free to fuck whatever chad she wanted, and statistically, they do. We have twice as many male ancestors as female ancestors because females were twice as likely to pass on their genes as males, meaning they were happy to share a chad and let more than half of men die without passing on their genes. You think you're the chad, but you're not. You're nothing but betabux. >My opponents are literally advocating the genocide of the people who propagate my own people. No they're not, they're advocating to not actively support them. Let them support themselves. Maybe they can learn an ounce of responsibility. Maybe it will encourage them to be good people instead of parasites. But you take pride in feeding the parasite that does nothing but leech from you and then hate you for it. You don't even get respect for it. You get nothing but scorn from society in general, for doing what they tell you to do. So stop doing it. Keep working on artificial wombs. Maybe use a surrogate to have kids. Don't actively try to support a system that treats men as hated beasts of burden. It's not that difficult to grasp. The motivation is to not actively support the system that brought us here in the first place. Also, since you're trying to sound smart, I'll point out that you used the word niggardly wrong. I'd assume it was a joke if you didn't spend the rest of your post trying to act pretentious.
>>4782 > Just so happens that "cuck" is the perfect word for that. So you're redefining words to make yourself look like less of a hypocrite? >I know your argument is that men typically have more physical strength and stamina, And are faster and smarter. >but of course this isn't true across the board. You want to make an argument based on outliers? >Should we genocide men that aren't stronger than the strongest woman, in some sort of eugenics program? Perhaps, but I don't think that's what you're actually arguing. Then why the fuck are you even bringing that up? >and women are just as capable of using a gun, if trained correctly, so your argument that men must protect women is moot. Some nigger-tier stupidity, right here. Even if it were true that women are as capable of using a gun as men, there's a lot more to combat than being able to squeeze a trigger. Something as simple as poor hygiene can devastate a woman physically. I'm sure you know, there aren't baths in battlefields. The reason why no non-feminists nations refuse to allow women in combat isn't because they are "cucks" or what ever stupid shit you're thinking, it's because they can't handle it at all and no amount of training or willpower will turn a woman into a man.
>>4802 >why no non-feminists nations refuse to allow women in combat isn't because they are "cucks" or what ever stupid shit you're thinking, it's because they can't handle it at all and no amount of training or willpower will turn a woman into a man. should be >why non-feminists nations refuse to allow women in combat isn't because they are "cucks" or what ever stupid shit you're thinking, it's because they can't handle it at all and no amount of training or willpower will turn a woman into a man.
>>4802 >So you're redefining words to make yourself look like less of a hypocrite? >redefining Never heard of the idea of colloquial usage before? Because that's how it's been used here for years. Maybe you're just a newfag who isn't aware of that, since you've used plenty of words with their colloquial definitions. The fact of the matter is that I explained why what you do is bad, and then simply used a common word to concisely describe a person who does those actions. Very different matter than you not making actual arguments and just calling people jews and muslims at the same time. >And are faster and smarter. I'd count speed as being directly related to strength and stamina, but sure. None of that is to say that they should be absolved of responsibility. The problem is that they demand standards be lowered for them, while simultaneously demanding they be treated equally. The system then just gives them the best of both worlds, while men get the worst of both worlds. >Then why the fuck are you even bringing that up? Because you're saying that since men are typically stronger and smarter than women, then women should be absolved of real responsibility and difficult jobs. They should be given extra rights and powers. They should get to live life on easy mode. Should men who are not as strong or smart as the average man, who may even be less strong or smart than a significant number of women, be allowed to live life on easy mode like women do? Should they get to have women's extra rights and powers? I highly doubt you'd support that proposition. So what do we do with those men? It wouldn't be fair to expect them to fulfill what you see as a man's role, since they have the same excuse as women. >The reason why no non-feminists nations refuse to allow women in combat isn't because they are "cucks" or what ever stupid shit you're thinking, it's because they can't handle it at all and no amount of training or willpower will turn a woman into a man. You could easily make certain standards and just demand they apply to everybody. If a woman can't meet the standards, she doesn't get in, same as a man who doesn't meet the standards. Also, you're highly exaggerating how easily a vagina can kill a woman, and exaggerating situations in which that would be relevant. The fact of the matter remains that this is almost never relevant in modern society, with modern technology, and yet you continue to try to use caveman excuses to justify giving women extra rights and powers, and absolving them of practically all responsibility for anything.
>>4804 >Very different matter than you not making actual arguments and just calling people jews and muslims at the same time. You seem to have serious brain problems. The post you've replied to is my very first post in this thread. >Because you're saying that since men are typically stronger and smarter than women, then women should be absolved of real responsibility and difficult jobs. They should be given extra rights and powers. I think you have me confused with someone else, buddy. >Also, you're highly exaggerating how easily a vagina can kill a woman, and exaggerating situations in which that would be relevant. "Devastate" doesn't mean kill, stupid. UTI is extremely relevant to combat situation where guys spend days out in a warzone. That's just one example of many issues women face that men don't. That said, even weak men aren't allowed in any competent military because caring around dead weight in a fight is stupid. >yet you continue to try to use caveman excuses to justify giving women extra rights and powers, and absolving them of practically all responsibility for anything. Never once did that, nigger-brain.
>>4806 Correction:It's my second post. I forgot about the first one.
>>1576 Fight fire with fire. Women are born parasites, and they never improve. Thus, I will act only on my individual interests when dealing with them. >Therefore you have no right I have the right to do whatever I want that benefits me individually. >do not demand rugged, selfish individualism for men and slavery for women I demand exactly that, as there is nothing wrong with it. It is the best case scenario, and the only one that I will tolerate, regarding dealing with women. If I can't have it, then I will abandon all women and actively do anything that I can to make society crumble, out of spite. >>4756 It is better to face genocide than to deal with women.
(35.94 KB 593x257 Parasites 1.jpg)
(36.02 KB 597x231 Parasites 2.jpg)
(35.51 KB 600x236 Parasites 3.jpg)
(34.53 KB 594x215 Parasites 4.jpg)
(42.13 KB 592x254 Parasites 5.jpg)
This is the kind of parasites that simps and cucks want free men to sacrifice themselves for. No thanks. No race, nation or civilization is worth keeping, if it needs men to care for such evil, subversive and void beings as women. https://archive.is/ZKjZM https://archive.is/OdOXk https://archive.vn/fk1fm https://archive.is/byWoQ https://archive.is/9ejh0
>>4807 Forgive me for not looking at IDs on an anonymous imageboard, since newfag shit like that defeats the entire point. Anyone who advocates for IDs or any other things that decrease anonymity should go the fuck back to facebook. You're only proving my point that your entire side can't make actual arguments.
>>4806 >"Devastate" doesn't mean kill, stupid. UTI is extremely relevant to combat situation where guys spend days out in a warzone. That's just one example of many issues women face that men don't. Have you met a woman? They're filthy. You so badly exaggerate the level of bad hygiene necessary. >That said, even weak men aren't allowed in any competent military because caring around dead weight in a fight is stupid. I'm not saying all women should be allowed in the military. Of course, few would want to join anyway. I'm saying that they should be just as expected as men, assuming they can pass the tests. They shouldn't be absolved of all responsibility for practically everything, while men, as a group, are expected to literally give their lives for women. >Never once did that, nigger-brain. Literally all you're doing.
>>4782 >I blame men who act like you as a group What? this doesn't answer my point at all, I said that both men and women should be held equally responsible for a crime i.e murder. I never said that one should get a free pass because they have a pussy. What else is funny for all the complaining you do about women you certainly want to be treated like one. >I don't blame all women Let's look back at your previous post shall we "First of all... >women >people pick one." If that alone doesn't pretty much prove that you see women as completely inferior to yourself I certainly don't know what does. Instead of acting like a sand nigger maybe you should try acting like a respectable European. >You're an idiot that actively argues and acts against his own self interest, and then is proud of it. You are proud of propagating a system that hates you, of taking those that hate you and raising them above yourself No, I'm not, I stated multiple times that I said that men and women should be held equally responsible for crimes they commit. I hate the fuck out of the modern system, I'm just not blind enough to see that it's the Jews that are the ones pushing this system not women. >I'm saying it because your strategy is to try to demean others for not actively trying to raise women above themselves Notice how his "argument" is actively ignoring what I posted and making a strawman about what I said. I said "A women and a man should be treated equally in court" which is the truth, The law shouldn't treat women differently than men. I know the other shit. >"False. They've just never been given any large scale responsibility, so they never act on it. I know your argument is that men typically have more physical strength and stamina," No that's not my argument, My argument is that women think more along an emotional basis due to the natural caretaker role that nature has provided them and thus makes them unsuitable for combat purposes. Men are more logical and can keep themselves from making mistakes which women would make much more of considering their very nature makes them more willing to emotionally lash out. Thus they would be hard pressed to receive orders under such stress. Physical strength and stamina are less necessary than the right mindset which a majority of women severely lack. This is the same reason why women are much rarer in a leader position and why most leaders throughout history are men. >since most of them won't lift a finger to defend anything other than their immediate selves You know what's funny about this he contradicts himself in the same post "You're an idiot that actively argues and acts against his own self interest" So it's okay when you do it but when women do it then suddenly it's a bad thing. Protecting women is actually very much in my self interest anyway because they birth children which is the whole basis of a civilization surviving as well. >because the majority of them are nothing but parasites. No they're not, women's roles are supporters they're supposed to do jobs that the man has no time to do like make food, take care of the child, teach the child etc. >Yeah, so have fun supporting a system where practically every woman is raised to be a slut/whore. Just shut your eyes and pretend you're not getting cucked. WOW WHAT AN AMAZING ARGUMENT I TOTALLY CAN'T ARGUE AGAINST THIS... But I actually can, The parents should be the one raising his children if he fails to raise his children then that's on the parent. The system is responsible of course but so is the person that's putting them into that system. > This is a totally different conversation, and I don't think I disagree with you. I guess where I disagree is that you want to "lift up your arms" as in to work for the system that has created this situation in the first place. What you should be doing is taking up arms against the system. Hell, even just refusing to support the system is enough, because it can't survive without us, without cucks like you supporting a system that does nothing but use you and demean you. Without the work of these people, society couldn't function. And why would I want to support a society that only uses me and demeans me? You sound like a women which is the most hilarious thing about this entire conversation, I never stated I supported the system in the first place. Because I don't support the Jews. Why would me protecting women suddenly equal me supporting the system. Again this is attempted deflection onto women rather than Jews.
>>4783 >"Depends which one. I believe in the concept of self sacrifice. I also acknowledge that the vast majority of women aren't even close to worth it." Here's the point the women wouldn't be like that in the first place if the men protected them from the propaganda. >This is why you get called a cuck. It's not a buzzword, it's because you feel pleasure in being used and demeaned. If you had any dignity at all, you'd stand up for yourself, or at least stop hurting yourself. Again, You're pinning the blame on women instead of the root of the problem, The Jews. Again I already said multiple times that I believe men and women should be treated equally in court. >Women aren't weak People like you have effectively given women superpowers. They have the ability to destroy a man's life with nothing more than a though Women are weaker than men on a physical and mental level, That much is fact. Not going to say it again, Again he's also accusing me of something I never indicated I supported in anyway. But you know who gives women that power. TAKE A GUESS. Again that doesn't absolve them of all guilt but it still shows that this guy is deliberately attempting to deflect from the Jews onto our own women. That's called divide and conquer. Obviously a lot of women are completely broken but still we need all the help we can get. >Yes... Already explained >You think women of those same groups don't get even more of a pass? You're comparing men to men and then claiming men can't be second class citizens because they have less rights than other men, ignoring the fact that those same men with "more" rights still have fewer rights than women. Utter bullshit, Go to any muslim country and see how women are treated there. Like animals. Same here muslim men beat up their women and pretty much rape them like their cattle. The only group of women that are more privileged than men are white women. That's for a couple of reasons. 1) Divide and Conquer, 2)Women are more inclined emotionally thus are easier too manipulate, This is also the reason women shouldn't be given the right to vote but even then democracy in general is nothing more than a giant fraud. > It's "not all women" but you're not even arguing about that, you're just absolving them of all responsibility, claiming they're manipulated. Why are they more absolved of responsibility for being manipulated than men? Oh right, because you simply think of them as better than yourself, as perfect innocent creatures that must be protected, and allowed to abuse you. Read my fucking post and stop ignoring the parts that don't fit with your agenda. I'm saying that women and men should be treated equally in court not that they should be absolved of any wrong doing. Again strawman argument. I never said they are better. I said they have different roles than men but an equally important one. >Where do you think you are? /pol/ the place which prides itself on white nationalism.,, The place which should be literally raging at the nigger who just claimed that white women aren't people. >Never actually did this, just argued that they objectively have more rights, and the system teaches them to be bad people, so you're better off just removing yourself from the system as much as possible. You did. You lumped them all together when you said "First of all... >women >people Pick one." >ie: while a woman does practically nothing except turn your children against you, until you find out the kids weren't even yours to begin with, because while she was lounging around all day, using up the resources you break your back to earn, she was free to fuck whatever chad she wanted, and statistically, they do. We have twice as many male ancestors as female ancestors because females were twice as likely to pass on their genes as males, meaning they were happy to share a chad and let more than half of men die without passing on their genes. You think you're the chad, but you're not. You're nothing but betabux. Lumping in every women as the same again... Oh the irony. But moreover again their parents are responsible for not raising their child responsibly. >No they're not, they're advocating to not actively support them. Let them support themselves. Maybe they can learn an ounce of responsibility. Maybe it will encourage them to be good people instead of parasites. But you take pride in feeding the parasite that does nothing but leech from you and then hate you for it. You don't even get respect for it. You get nothing but scorn from society in general, for doing what they tell you to do. So stop doing it. Well since it's completely obvious you're a Jew at this point. The only parasite is the Jew. Women were never parasites they did other jobs which you haven't even disproven yet because you can't disprove them. Because the Jews are promoting unnatural life styles for men and women. >Artifical wombs. Remember that the Jews are in charge. Always assume these come with a catch.
>>4825 Good arguments. >Remember that the Jews are in charge. Always assume these come with a catch. They don't exist and won't. That's the point. Steer people towards some retarded fantasy they can't achieve. Same as with transsexuals. Men won't become women that can get pregnant and women will never become men that can produce sperm. Not even "pretend birth" is viable for the majority of trannies.
>>4824 >I said that both men and women should be held equally responsible for a crime i.e murder. Except they shouldn't be, because it's the jew's fault for manipulating the woman and the men's fault for not protecting her from the manipulation. >Let's look back at your previous post shall we It's called a joke, dingus. Is this your first day here or something? But also, saying they're not people, even saying they are inferior, would not be blaming all of them. But no, if you want me to make explicit, without jokes, my actual complaint, it's that people like you have made women, to use their terminology, privileged, and despite you saying you don't want to do this, you then repeatedly advocate for it. I'd like to be treated equally, I would, but people like you have taken that option off the table. >What else is funny for all the complaining you do about women you certainly want to be treated like one. I don't complain about women, I complain about the way they're allowed to act, and how they are openly given more power and less responsibility. So yes, obviously I'd like to be treated like that. Again, you try to shame someone for not wanting to be a second class citizen, but if you just stepped outside your own shoes for a moment you'd see how ridiculous that is. >I'm just not blind enough to see that it's the Jews that are the ones pushing this system not women. Yet a large number of women are the willing tools, and you are refusing to hold them responsible. A large number of men are willing tools of this system as well, including yourself. Believe me, I hold you just as responsible as the rest of them. You also fail to understand I'm not just talking about crime, though that is a significant factor. They also get preferential treatment by just about every organization on the planet, including governments. More benefits, easier access to jobs, more difficulty getting fired, etc. And by you absolving them of all responsibility for everything they do short of murder, saying that anything they do isn't really their fault, but rather solely the fault of jews, as if women are literal mindless automatons, you are supporting this system, and also acting a lot more like a sandnigger than the "enlightened european" you want to portray yourself to be. >in court, in court, in court Notice you have to significantly narrow the argument to point to a tiny area where you agree with me that men shouldn't be second class citizens, as if that will get me to ignore all the other areas where you openly want men to be nothing but beasts of burden that live to serve their female overlords. >women aren't suitable for combat I wasn't just talking about combat, but I think you aren't either. I understand that the things you're talking about extend to other fields as well, which legitimizes your point. Fair enough. Of course, all you're doing is acknowledging that the majority of them are useless parasites. You just want to use more polite language than me, so that you can justify giving those parasites much better lives than their hosts, who you want to act as beasts of burden. >You know what's funny about this he contradicts himself in the same post >"You're an idiot that actively argues and acts against his own self interest" There is a difference between honor and being a cuck. There's a difference between supporting your kids and supporting your wife's kids. There's a difference between a mutually beneficial relationship, and just being a proud beast of burden for collection of parasites that don't care if you live or die. Actually, scratch that. They do care. They'd prefer if you died. >since they birth children That's not enough. If that's all they're good for, then that should be acknowledged, and they should just be made into breeding machines and sex toys. If they want to be treated like people, then they should be given the responsibilities of people. Either option is fine with me, but you want to give them the best of both worlds and the worst of none. Though frankly, even if I were them I'd be fine with either option. Of course, I have a sense of fairness, which most women, and most cucks like you, seem to lack. >The parents should be the one raising his children if he fails to raise his children then that's on the parent. The system is responsible of course but so is the person that's putting them into that system. This has practically nothing to do with my argument that you say it's replying to. So much that I don't even get what point you're trying to make. Are you saying it's your fault if some bitch takes your kids away from you? Seems like something you'd agree with since you think they're inherently better at raising kids (stats show otherwise) and shouldn't have responsibility for their own bad actions as long as they're not outright crimes (because morality is based on legality, apparently). Or maybe you're trying to argue that you should blame their parents for raising them wrong in the first place. Sure. I'd agree. That doesn't contradict my point at all that it's stupid to support a system where practically every woman is a slut/whore. You can pretend yours isn't. We've all met many men who try to pretend like that. But maybe your woman will be different. Maybe you'll be the lucky one. Maybe you'll be the one alpha chad that gets a wife that hasn't only decided to marry after riding the cock carousel for so long that her bodily fluids have been replaced by semen and the pleasure centers of her brain are blown out by endorphin overdose, so she can't even feel pleasure from you anymore. But oh wait, you're on fucking 8moe. You're betabux at best, and you know it. And even if you weren't, your chances of being that chad would still be astronomical.
>No they're not, women's roles are supporters they're supposed to do jobs that the man has no time to do like make food, take care of the child, teach the child etc. Except men can do those jobs, and especially with modern technology, the jobs of both men and women are much simpler and less time consuming. If you can't feed yourself, then you much as well just fucking kill yourself. Taking care of/teaching a child? Good to see someone else who supports homeschooling. Because otherwise, you have no leg to stand on here, since the vast majority of women have some government appointed woman raise/indoctrinate their child instead, very frequently after leaving the father, so that there isn't even an option for one parent to stay home and raise the kid. Of course, there's no reason for that parent to have to be the mother. And on the topic of single parents, we all know they're disasters, right? Actually, only single mothers. Kids raised by single fathers end up only slightly worse than kids with normal families, and keep in mind that in order for a dad to get custody, the mother has to be one of the worst monsters on the planet (seeing as literal child molesters and murderers get to keep their kids as long as they're mothers and not fathers), or the mother has to be outright dead. So by the time a father gets custody, the kid has to have already been through serious shit. Yet they don't end up much worse off. Mothers are, statistically, worse parents. Not that I think this should matter in court. But of course, due to thinking like yours, mothers get custody in almost every case, because they're "supposed" to, right? That's their natural role? You don't think you're being feminist, but you are advocating for the ideas that lead to horrible mothers keeping custody and practically every father getting no chance at raising their own children. So you'd better find a way to stop divorce from happening. I'm sure you are opposed to divorce. Now are you willing to blame women for initiating it in the vast majority of cases? I know you blame the jews above them. Fine. Not even disagreeing with you. But does that absolve individual women of the individual choice to initiate divorce? Obviously not. Also, with working from home becoming more and more of an option for more people, fathers should hopefully have more opportunities to actually raise their kids. Of course women won't support their families and let men raise the kids. Women would rather be worthless parasites that act like lounging around on the couch while the kids are at school and the father is at work is a job, so basically the only way men will get to raise their kids is working from home and homeschooling. Maybe then those men could raise some good daughters that aren't taught to be worthless parasites. Of course they'd need to hire surrogates to do it, but it's pretty much the only way a modern father would get to see his kids more than every other weekend. >I never stated I supported the system in the first place. You never stated it, you just actually support it with practically everything you say. >Why would me protecting women suddenly equal me supporting the system. Because that IS the system. A system in which women get to do nothing and men are expected to give their lives, frequently literally, for them. >Again this is attempted deflection onto women rather than Jews. Why not both? Why must you continually attempt to absolve women of responsibility for their own actions? You can acknowledge a bad influence while also acknowledging the responsibility of the one that chose to do the actual bad action. Nobody is holding a gun to their heads and forcing them do be bad, but they do it anyway, because they are encouraged to, yes, but that doesn't mean the fact that they can't stop to think of the actual morality of their actions is okay. >>4825 >Here's the point the women wouldn't be like that in the first place if the men protected them from the propaganda. The women wouldn't be like it if they didn't just gobble up all the propaganda around them. Hell, you could argue the men that don't do what you want are also victims of propaganda, and the women should have protected them. But of course you don't blame women for that, because you absolve women of all responsibility for anything. >Again, You're pinning the blame on women instead of the root of the problem, The Jews. You can talk about roots of problems and bad influences while still acknowledging that people are responsible for their own actions. >Again I already said multiple times that I believe men and women should be treated equally in court. And yet you say men must be responsible for protecting women, and women are not responsible for... well anything. Anything they do is the fault of jews for influencing them and men for not protecting them. Women can't be held responsible for anything. >Again he's also accusing me of something I never indicated I supported in anyway. You are supporting it right now, idiot. Everything you're arguing for is supporting it. >But you know who gives women that power. TAKE A GUESS. You. You are the one that gives them that power. You are manipulated by jews to do so. Does that mean I don't still hold you responsible? No, you are responsible for your own actions here. You are responsible for openly advocating for women being treated better than men. >it still shows that this guy is deliberately attempting to deflect from the Jews onto our own women. It's the opposite. It shows that you're deliberately trying to deflect all responsibility off of women and onto jews. Why not both? Why do you have to get so butthurt when people point out women's actions? Nobody said to leave the jews alone. You brought them up and nobody contradicted you. Your whole presence in this thread is just trying to deflect from the conversation you saw was happening in it. Again, nobody is arguing with you about jews. Nobody is saying you're wrong on that point. You're just trying to shut down a conversation acknowledging that women have some responsibility here. >Obviously a lot of women are completely broken but still we need all the help we can get. I'm not saying "all women." In fact, due to people like you giving them godlike superpowers, the rare good one is a very powerful teammate. That doesn't mean you shouldn't acknowledge the problems caused by the way they are taught to act. The rare good ones will acknowledge it.
>Already explained It wouldn't need to be explained if you didn't ask "Men are treated like second class citizens now?" Don't blame me for needing to point out how. >Utter bullshit, Go to any muslim country and see how women are treated there. Like animals. Same here muslim men beat up their women and pretty much rape them like their cattle. Ridiculous exaggeration and partial lies. Everything they do is to protect women. The reason they have them dress like ninjas is because they think that men are mindless animals that have no self control and will turn into rape machines if they see cheekbones or an ankle. Regardless, I'm also not concerned with shithole countries, as they are shitholes. I'd be fine if they were just glassed. I'm concerned with western countries. When we're talking about rights, it's kind of pointless to talk about wildly different societies from completely different cultural spheres. >That's for a couple of reasons. 1) Divide and Conquer, 2)Women are more inclined emotionally thus are easier too manipulate, This is also the reason women shouldn't be given the right to vote but even then democracy in general is nothing more than a giant fraud. I don't disagree with this. I just don't think that that makes the actions of the majority of women, and the cucks like you (who may be the majority of men) okay. >I'm saying that women and men should be treated equally in court not that they should be absolved of any wrong doing. I had to explain to you how men have objectively fewer rights, and that extends well outside of the courtroom, which you conveniently ignore since your entire argument is that men should be happy to be treated worse. Just now you're saying court is the one exception. You're still advocating for men to need to actually work, while women just get to sit around and be parasites. >I never said they are better. And yet you openly encourage that they get better treatment. >I said they have different roles than men but an equally important one. >one So since they get pregnant a few times in their lives, they get to be parasites for the rest of them. Nope. Raw deal, and you're a beta bitch for taking it. >/pol/ the place which prides itself on white nationalism.,, The place which should be literally raging at the nigger who just claimed that white women aren't people. Tradcucks get the rope, too. The place should be raging at a female supremacist like yourself. You claim not to be, but you consistently advocate for women having much better lives than men, with ridiculous power and no responsibility. >But moreover again their parents are responsible for not raising their child responsibly. Blame whoever you want. It doesn't change the situation, and you're still supporting that situation. >Women were never parasites they did other jobs which you haven't even disproven yet because you can't disprove them. Women's historical job has been to take the resources earned by the men and distribute them among their family. Over time, not only has that become even more absurdly easy than before, but women also women more and more frequently had the audacity not only to claim that this was a job, but that it was equal to or even more difficult than men's jobs. Of course their number of workplace injuries and deaths are about a million times lower, but let's just ignore that. A man will break his back just to earn the opportunity to take care of his family. Taking care of his family is his reward. Meanwhile, women act as if taking care of their family is a job, and an awful job at that. That's how awful and selfish and spoiled women ("NOT ALL WOMEN!" Since you need that qualifier every damn time we talk about a group) are. What men see as a reward, they see as a job. >Remember that the Jews are in charge. I'd watch your phrasing, since this almost sounds like a Jew just trying to crush the hopes of the goyim and keep them in place. >Always assume these come with a catch. I'm sure they will, but we'll cross that bridge when we get to it. >>4826 Didn't they succeed in making viable embryos without sperm years ago? Women could already have their all-female utopia if they wanted, except then they wouldn't have men to use as slaves, so they don't actually want it. Artificial wombs may still need donor eggs at first, but that's still a vast improvement over needing a womb. One step at a time.
>>467 Just some more examples of women's parasitic nature, and why no man should never care for any woman, ever. Also, in one of the links, a woman blames all men for the behavior of rapist invaders, conveniently ignoring the fact women are the main voters for open boarders. As always, women create problems just to feel excitement, and then blame men when those problems affect women. https://archive.is/z57EY https://archive.is/lV0TB
>>4861 >all wahmen are PARASITES >here are two tweets You are clinically insane.
>>4861 Its only natural for women to be parasites, they are weak and should be protected. The reason why women are support illegal immigration of rapefugees is probably because white men have gone too soft and have stopped manhandling them. Freedom is making them dizzy, they crave rape and servitude.
>>4824 >Remember that the Jews are in charge. They aren't. Not anymore. and we will kill them all, eventually. There is no future for jews.
>>4862 >all wahmen are PARASITES Yes. >You are clinically insane. Says the woman worshiper who wants men to be slaves. >>4865 >Its only natural for women to be parasites Therefore it is natural to avoid them and to replace them artificially, over time. >they are weak Yes. and that makes them the enemies of all men. >and should be protected. NEVER. A man must never reward women's evil nature just because women are naturally weak. If women aren't enslaved by men, then women must be replaced. >is probably because white men have gone too soft Same copypasta spread over and over, exactly the same, in every board. IT IS NOT MEN'S FAULT. IT IS WOMEN'S FAULT. Women's mistakes and behavior is WOMEN'S FAULT and nobody else's. The jew manipulate. But women accept it and go along with it, even when presented with the truth behind jewish lies. Every woman is responsible for her own actions. Men are NEVER at fault for women's stupidity. >Freedom is making them dizzy Freedom is the single most important thing for a man. Freedom is more important than sex. Freedom is more important than race. Freedom is more important than humanity itself. Freedom is more important than nation. Freedom is more important than reproduction. Freedom is more important than women.
>>4867 Freedom is fucking overrated. I would rather live in Stalinist Russia with a loyal wife who can cook and clean and mother our children than in this libertine utopia. And we don't even really have to be Stalinists to get that, we each have our natural place, one by the other, and we either both take that place of our own accord or destroy ourselves in this gender war the jew took decades of brainwashing to bring about. Men go along with their lies too, even when confronted with the truth. In reality there are the thinkers and the lemmings, and it is the duty of the intelligentsia to lead the lemmings. Ours gave that duty up to the jews, and if we want any sort of peace we must take it back. That is the purpose of making propaganda. Anything less is slavery, no matter how much freedom you fool yourself into believing you have.
>>4894 >>Freedom is overated Then do best to be hopeful that you don't yourself become someone's property. It isn't a lie, but more or less something that the jews and most who oppose such ideals to withhold it. >>Talks about Whites vs Jews Other races could easily be in that position of your what if story. All that needs to happen is someone who is willing to be that leader for that race. But to add, there can be a possibility of people who are not just sheep, but those who make their way of living their own lives, forgeing the path of what they want in life and building their own being day by day. The only reason why we still don't live in a libertaian society and why most humans don't have their own will to make what they see fit in life is because of shit like the jews who spread lies about some potential of a higher being or that somehow whites are the enemy when yet, they have been the hero of all races. Without us, they wouldn't be on cell phones, dreaming of alternative timelines or wishing to live in vidya games/anime to do whatever the fuck they want. We just need to show races such as the niggers that they can forge their own life, and some have done that and are thankful for our founding fathers, but the shitmess that is politics as of right now is what is stopping so called black "hoods" from improving and living a good quality of life.


Quick Reply
Extra
Delete
Report

no cookies?