>>3594 This basically >>3598 The compiler will set and optimize allocation automatically for local variables because it knows the lifespan and size of the variable at runtime, it allocates when the function is called and deallocates when it returns, which is the point theyre making I think, once you use variables outside of functions the compiler doesnt know how to manage the variable or does so in strange ways when you dont give instructions, saying no to global variables is more like a beginners rule since you now have to do what the compiler would normally do for you automatically its also a nightmare for debugging since the compiller will not hold your hand when you do stupid things I assume its even worse in interpreted languages because there you have no clue whats going on in the interpreter

>>3611 You can either get something cheap or something good, not both also don't buy from amazon, you never know what you're gonna get. Buy directly from WD

>>3637 Do you have Gentoo?

How long is your beard?

Just updated to the new version. The ghost-pending-tags issue seems fixed. Thanks!

I found a small problem with watchers. The status column of the watchers list doesn't sort by actual time when you click on it (to sort by status). Instead, it seems to sort by the first number of each watcher in the list, so for example, "15 hours" is treated like it's bigger than "6 days".

>>3638 As far as I know internally the status isn't "updating at X" where X can be sorted, it's "an update is planned at some point in the future"; the sort is then made from the subject, alphabetically. Could this be what you're seeing here? (I'll state here that I personally like this behavior)

>>3625 wow this is great this is the best thread tbh

>>3632 I agree, OP is really contributing to the board as a whole with this.

>>3625 unix way of programing? step aside whore this is the Minecraft way!!

>>3607 That's a tracking goyphone

>>3587 That's not outside. Maybe could go somewhere and use big umbrella and compute under it?

>>3565 That is awesome. I hope I can be that cool one day. >>3607 Disgusting. Get a Sharp Zaurus and run OpenBSD on it. Maybe a Toshiba Libretto if you want something a little larger. Or any of the other things that all the cool kids are using (there aren't many cool kids).

>>3603 meant median not medium

Doesn't Monero require burning electricity for no reasons like Bitcoin?

>>3616 Yeah, but as I understand it, the algorithm it uses for proof-of-work, is specifically designed to work well on normal computer hardware and to be resistant to specialized GPUs. Still not as good as something like proof-of-stake IMO, but better than bitcoin.

>>449 If you're not using a Tor gateway, you're part of the cannon fodder protecting the rest of us. Thank you for your services.

>>3435 Why? That's fucking retarded.

>>3612 superior process management also that killswitch to corrupt ram when pulling the usb out works with a daemon init cucks will swerve to the d

<US government confirms Russian SVR behind the SolarWinds hack >The United States government is formally accusing the Russian government of the SolarWinds supply-chain attack that gave hackers access to the network of multiple U.S. agencies and private tech sector companies. >The press release from the White House confirms past media reports citing unofficial sources that the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service, the SVR, was behind the SolarWinds hack. https://archive.is/Yzz89 Is it happening yet?

>>3563 not until the nukes drop. till then it's all blame shifting.

>>3563 They're just trying to ease the public into awareness. SVR even had passwords belonging to Dominions Voting System's staff since 2018, and probably fucked with that election too you can find it in the DB torrents floating around on Pirate bay.

>>3323 Says the Open Sores user that has the backwards design.

>>3204 I have to deal with Windows 10 every so often and I am convinced literal pajeets with laptops are programming windows gui while they take a shit on a sidewalk. It just doesn't make sense how a company like Microsoft can shit out something this bad. Vista was nothing compared to Win10 GUI.

>>2967 it's coded by minimum wage brown people in far distant lands

>>3480 Have to agree with some key points made in >>3482. Inheritance is far less important than textbooks and people at job interviews give it credit for. Controlling access to data and grouping the data via a common interface is the real meat of it. If you don't need to organize data and control access to it, there's really not a massive need for objects in your code. There is a case for inheritance, of course, especially as you move to large programs. Especially those with GUIs. And factories can help with abstraction. It's nice to be able to generate an object as needed and be able to interact with it using the same interface for all the children without regard for the underpinnings. But it's also a lot of preparation. The worst thing is developers who worship Object Oriented as though it were a god. Absolute brainlets who think a 50 line script is improved by 300 lines of handlers to abstract something you set once. It could have been a variable. No harm is done. No additional validation is needed. If you're that concerned, add a check or an assert. Adding objects where they're not needed just adds complexity for no reason. If you look at a big block of spaghetti, or worse, multiple blocks of repeated copypasted spaghetti, and you say "it would be easier just to track each of these and manage them with basic rules", it's time to use an object. Segregate the data, mark how to handle it, and then have that function handle it properly for that subtype. You just condensed spaghetti into one line and it probably cost you 50 in boilerplate, but you never have to worry again. >>3487 Procedural is fine and great for scripts, but there does come a point when sifting through data or trying to ensure certain variables comply with rules is just easier to do with objects. Procedural has some severe limitations when it comes to tracking state over the long term. Like you said, you end up reinventing the wheel more often than not. Sometimes you really just want a linked list, and writing one in C is a lot of extra work with a lot less guarantees. This is one reason I use C++ even for programs that would be fine in C: it's nice to just include existing data structures and run with them. >

I haven't tried using Rust, but from what I read and (try to) understand, the "safety" of Rust comes from not allowing raw memory access with pointers outside of unsafe blocks?

>>3599 The compiler has an element called a "borrow checker". This is basically the same as smart pointers in C++, where references to an object are counted and tracked. The difference is, they still make you clean it up and have syntax to specify you're passing ownership of the memory from wherever, and then the borrow checker looks it all over and verified everything created was freed by its owner. Unsafe blocks basically just disable the checker for that region. Rustfags are just mad other languages gives you tools to handle memory instead of having the language scream in your face constantly.

>>3556 https://www.fsf.org/news/rms-addresses-the-free-software-community

Explain, /t/ >https://twitter.com/mjg59/status/1381791257719042053

>>3558 thats funny as hell

How does Sven Coop/Anglescript fare to other Quake 1 derived engines and Xonotic?

>>3408 >>3479 Yes.

>>3509 >Anglescript fare to other Quake 1 derived engines and Xonotic? Not sure. Darkplaces QuakeC is very feature packed (as is ftewqcc). Darkplaces supports crypto (aes128). And my version of darkplaces can go up to 4 million entities (experimental source and linux 32 and 64 bit on the iso)

this would be like 10 lines in bash if you used wget

>The 9th Circuit has defended the right to scrape publicly-accessible data (Archive). In the same ruling, they explicitly disallow measures which discriminate against scrapers, holding that they have the right to access any data a user with a web browser does. Who the fuck is the 9th circuit and why should anyone care? And also you're wrong faggot, you don't have the right to rape web servers with automated requests because that stupid article lies on a fallacy that bot activity = "a user with a web browser" which is clearly wrong unless you limit your tool to 20KB/s which I doubt is the case so fuck off.

>>3513 https://infogalactic.com/info/United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit Maybe you should've actually looked it up instead of fagging out about it. >And also you're wrong faggot, you don't have the right to rape web servers with automated requests. Explain what the actual issue with scraping public data is, aside from "muh requests", get a better VPS or connection then if you're hosting public data that's starting to be scraped and you otherwise have no objections to such scraping.

>>3425 "Making all function args and returns 64-bit is a core principle of TempleOS." "A Queue is a bunch of MAlloc()ed chunks of mem linked together in a circle with one ptr to the next value and another ptr to the last value. These ptrs must be stored in the first locations in the structure." I guess it is automatically int64, because there are other Que class called CQueD3I32 for three dimensional I32 ptrs. public class CQueD3I32 { ..CQueD3I32 *next,*last; ..CD3I32 p; }; public class CD3I32 { ..I32 x,y,z; };

>>3425 There are different allocation functions. To allocate a class you use a function called CAlloc(). U8 * CAlloc(I64 size, CTask * mem_task = NULL) { ..U8 * res = MAlloc (size, mem_task); ..MemSet (res, 0, size); ..return res; } (/kernel/Mem/MAllocFree.HC.Z) So it's an int64 data type.

>>3511 >To allocate a class you use a function called CAlloc(). I was wrong! You use CAlloc() for CTask or CHeapCtrl, not for class allocation. Btw. here is the kernel code for MAlloc(): _extern _MALLOC U8 *MAlloc(I64 size,CTask *mem_task=NULL);