/t/ - Technology

Discussion of Technology

Index Catalog Archive Bottom Refresh
Mode: Reply
Options
Subject
Message

Max message length: 8000

Files

Max file size: 32.00 MB

Max files: 5

Supported file types: GIF, JPG, PNG, WebM, OGG, and more

E-mail
Password

(used to delete files and postings)

Misc

Remember to follow the rules

The backup domain is located at 8chan.se. .cc is a third fallback. TOR access can be found here, or you can access the TOR portal from the clearnet at Redchannit.

WebSockets Enabled! Threads should update live as posts are made. Please report any issues on >>>/site/1518

8chan.moe is a hobby project with no affiliation whatsoever to the administration of any other "8chan" site, past or present.

(73.37 KB 600x478 spurdo_computer.png)
User-respecting websites Anonymous 07/01/2020 (Wed) 14:17:12 No. 546
Are there any notable websites left that would respect the user's right even to some degree? My criteria are quite simple: 1. The website must not require javascript to work properly. It's fine to have extra functionality that requires javascript, but the main purpose of the site should be implemented without requiring javascript. 2. The website must allow Tor users and other proxy users. 3. The website must not require the user to give his name, address, phone number or any other identifying detail. In other words, the website must allow pseudo-anonymity. I can think of very few such websites: 1. cock.li allows you to create e-mail addresses, although the webmail doesn't work, but you can use your own e-mail client instead. 2. Some smaller imageboards work. 3. Search engines like duckduckgo and sometimes Startpage work. Although Startpage has been more frustrating lately. A lot of forums require registration, which is not new, but nowadays they require the user to pass google recaptcha v3, which does not work at all without javascript, and even with javascript it often just gives a never-ending list of traffic lights. invidio.us works without javascript, but the comment section doesn't really work, and you obviously cannot upload videos that way. Bitchute allows you to watch videos if you already have the channel URL and do some RMB+Q magic, but the main page is practically unusable without javascript, and registration requires recaptcha v3. None of the social media sites fit the criteria, obviously.
Javascript took over the world after it all but killed CGI programming. Every fucking thing uses it to offload some of the server work to your browser to keep the giant website bloat of the modern day from slowing their shit down. I hate it.
>>547 That may be part of the reason why big corporations love javascript, aside from data mining, but it wouldn't explain why even open source developers make javascript a requirement. PeerTube for instance only has one front-end, and that is written completely in javascript. It simply does not work without it. This has gotten to the point where imageboards are the only places of communication left on the web where the user can communicate with at least some degree of anonymity and security, not to mention freedom, but that is another topic.
>>548 >but it wouldn't explain why even open source developers make javascript a requirement. It's far less expensive than doing the same work on their server. There, mystery solved.
>>552 Do you have evidence of this? I don't think they are optimizing for data size or bandwidth, considering how many large pictures and animations they want to show on people's screens. Besides, they often don't even make links in regular HTML. That would not cost them any computing power whatsoever. I still think that incompetence, fashion, and espionage are the biggest reasons, unless there is data to suggest otherwise.
>>553 >do you have evidence that having someone else's computer do work is cheaper than doing it yourself? Is this bait?
This is a great presentation: https://idlewords.com/talks/website_obesity.htm >>546 Here's a list of some "text-only sites" that will more than likely align with what you want. https://sjmulder.nl/en/textonly.html This is an awesome service: https://0x0.st/ As is this: http://wttr.in/ And privacytools.io works perfectly without JS and has no 3rd party calls: https://www.privacytools.io/
>>560 >This is a great presentation The author does extremely dumb shit like bitching about the size of a photo slideshow, or complaining about size of video, or talking about "page size" without distinguishing between CSS, HTML, and JS... Also he though micropayments would work, which is all you need to know to realize he's out of touch. Finally, it takes 34 seconds on stock Firefox for his sub-100 kb page to finish loading, thanks mostly to all the images on it being broken: many of the bloated pages he complain about finish faster than that, despite weighting 100x as much.
(11.73 KB 356x248 1481222868615.jpg)
>>560 >https://0x0.st/ >muh alt right
>>560 >https://sjmulder.nl/en/textonly.html I really needed this. I love text only websites. Most stuff these days is bloated as fuck, even if you just want to read news and stuff
>>547 If you sync shit like that with the server it's even slower on the user's end. Try out some ultra bloated framework like Vaadin that is more or less server site rendered and you'll see. If it has to be an interface like that, it makes sense processing it on the client. But many overlook that you can easily build stripped down websites without javascript that still work great on mobile devices.
These are cool no logs image hosts https://cockfile.com/ https://coinsh.red/ (has a tor link as well)
>>664 That's just there to keep the nu/pol/ babies away. If your offended good, gtfo. altkike is retarded.
>>823 >cockfile theres another filehost to add to my script.
>>855 the whole left is also retarded kekers
https://porndex.neocities.org/category-vanilla.html Hands down best porn site around.
(12.83 KB 166x166 wow!.png)
>pomf and cockfile Thanks for the weekend project anon
>>855 >nu/pol/ babies ok officer
What happened to cock e-mail? Has Vincent finally nuked it for good? Can't seem to load main page and server-side mail client loading seems to fail each time.
riseup.net
>>1136 It works, it's just unstable and goes down sometimes.
(59.53 KB 890x670 CS major.jpg)
>>552 This is why JS was originally conceived (as were browser cookies). But anyone who has worked in a web startup knows that bloat has nothing to do with saving money. Poor programming skills, ego, fanboy-ism, refusal to learn the basics of one's field, procrastination, and "Ooh, shiny" all have a lot more to do with it. >>562 Cherry-picking. You can open nearly any site now and find literal megabytes of bloat that could be cut out. Page load times are only part of it. Less bloat means fewer bugs, a more navigable site, and (*gasp*) a clearer idea of just what you're trying to accomplish with your klutzy web app. Despite being brain-damaged communist spawn, Ceglowski has managed to put his finger on one of cultural marxism's more embarrassing failures. You can't just sit a cheap grunt laborer in front of a keyboard and expect a masterpiece. >>560 >0x0.st >No TOR exit nodes >Nothing illegal under (((German law))) But hey, now we can post our doggo memes without javascript >porndex.neocities.org >Only White actors, no Orientals, Asians, Africans, Mixed, etc. >Only straight content, no cuckolding porn >Not more than one dick in a video >No scat, full body tattoos, etc. Now we're fucking talking
>User-respecting websites there are only 2 sites: 1. nanochan 2. picochan 3. https://wiby.me/ >>547 >JS is used for offloading that doesn't nearly encompass the reasons people use JShit, nigger PLEASE DO NOT COME TO NANOCHAN
Banned for Shilling
(212.01 KB 480x360 fuck_all_that_wigger_ass_shit.mp4)
OH NO NO NO this shit again are you the same retarded faggot who posted his shitty porn site on nanochan? why am i not surprised after sperging about commies in the same post. >while girls only 13 milliseconds in i see a bunch of middle eastern octapas and shit: aidra fox, whatever lopez >no cuckolding by watching a guy fuck a girl you are getting cucked, especially if you are fapping to it. that is literally cuckolding by definition, except you never even owned the waifu in question in the first place. so you are lower than a cuck >vanilla page goes to zoom up of guy licking da pussy, instead of a girl masturbating or posing alone LMFAOOOO nigga u gay meanwhile, a bunch of degenerate fetish shit: >Anal Pregnant BDSM Cosplay Feet Lactation Wet BBW and i bet this faggot omits lesbian because muh degeneracy, and faps to pregnant porn instead and videos of a guy slobering all over a pussy. the absolute state of wh*te people >lol i iz woke cuz i used jewniggercockcities lol just had to send my phone number lol it's the 90s again cuz they let me host pure html after fucking it up with their additions OH NO I WAS SKEPTICAL BUT NO YOU FULL GAY >0x0.st >No TOR exit nodes gotta agree here this is next level retard
>> 1411 Would you mind posting a porn site that's also actuall a good website?
Dumping some good sites in no particular order: curl rate.sx/eth@4w bible4u2lvhacg4b3to2e2veqpwmrc2c3tjf2wuuqiz332vlwmr4xbad.onion/ maps.vlasenko.net/soviet-military-topographic-map/map200k.html www.fcctests.com/neets/neets.htm (lmao) lcamtuf.coredump.cx/electronics/ www.veracrypt.fr/en/VeraCrypt%20Hidden%20Operating%20System.html learnyouahaskell.com/chapters libraryqtlpitkix.onion/library/ the-eye.eu/public/Books/cnqzu.com/_Table%20of%20Contents.htm libraryqtlpitkix.onion/library/ xfmro77i3lixucja.onion/ xchangen24yn24b6.onion/ wiki.archlinux.org/index.php dds6qkxpwdeubwucdiaord2xgbbeyds25rbsgr73tbfpqpt4a6vjwsyd.onion/wiki/Category:Documentation mail2tor2zyjdctd.onion/ tapeucwutvne7l5o.onion/ digdeeper.neocities.org/ghost/addons.html elfq2qefxx6dv3vy.onion/fakeid.php qkndirty6fifcrdk.onion/ buggedplanet.info/index.php?title=Main_Page 7ea7vegvcqgdzxjz.onion/ searx7gwtu5rh6wr.onion/ 3g2upl4pq6kufc4m.onion/ potatoynwcg34xyodol6p6hvi5e4xelxdeowsl5t2daxywepub32y7yd.onion/ underdiriled6lvdfgiw4e5urfofuslnz7ewictzf76h4qb73fxbsxad.onion/ torrentzwealmisr.onion/search?f=OP+is+a+faggot uoxqi4lrfqztugili7zzgygibs4xstehf5hohtkpyqcoyryweypzkwid.onion/?img=131601215350.png zerobinqmdqd236y.onion/ torlook.info/ github.com/ somehow they still allow visiting through tor n-gate.com/ about:config >>1410 >>1411 (Hapa, You) Asukafag get out! This is a White's man discussion.
(26.19 KB 188x343 the gay community.jpg)
>curl rate.sx/[email protected] who is the admin of this site? what fucking inept turbo retard allows this to happen? even if you have to use cuckflare, i'm sure there's a way to disable this faggotry 8chan.se is not a user respecting website. it's the same endless moron shit as the original 8gag
>>1417 there are none. it's just endless cucksumer clickbait as the wiggoid race so demands
(161.95 KB 385x512 thumbs up hoodie waifu.png)
>>1432 you are part of the cancer. you identify by race. you cannot have a single discussion without bringing up race (unironically). you are the exact same as the SJW cancer. you even go as far to constantly assign "white man's tech" to garbage hillbilly software of the likes i used to break 20 years ago, hence why the wh*te meme is so funny. you are unfixable. i came here to remind you to kys
>>1436 It gets better when you find the ones who support anti-FOSS ideologies but only use GNU/paranoia software like Devuan. Unironically, a person avatarfagging an anime girl in a Nazi officer uniform recommending AntiX, and Google services as 'private' but systemd bad. It's beautiful.
>>1468 It's not surprising, given how much of the community is cargo cultists.
(246.96 KB 1920x1040 7tS0EPZUQb.png)
>>1432 Doesn't GitHub require JavaScript to view repositories nowadays?
>>1534 Is there a single website that doesn't require javashit to work at all nowadays? Imageboards and some search engines are basically the only kind of websites that work without it.
>>1534 You can see the repo and the files within it without javascript, but you can't see the last commit info next to each file without javascript.
>>1536 There's a billion interesting blogs that don't need JS. Example: https://cheapskatesguide.org/
>>546 >Search engines like duckduckgo and sometimes Startpage work. Although Startpage has been more frustrating lately. Startpage is shit and pulls results from google anyway. DDG isn't much better. Searx fits all the criteria you specified. Snopyta Searx instance: http://juy4e6eicawzdrz7.onion/ Alternate Searx instance: http://nxhhwbbxc4khvvlw.onion/
(151.78 KB 400x426 yui.png)
>>1410 wiby.me is one of the most innocent search engines on the internet.
>>546 >muh scary jervascript >muh tor Javascript isn't a security issue, nor does it remove your freedumbs. Cope.
>>1774 You will never be a real women. kys
>>1774 JavaScript, being paired with browsers, is easily the biggest day-to-day security hole on your entire system. Disabling it immediately improves privacy and security.
>>1774 it removes my freedom to have the browser respond to mouse clicks and keypresses, that's for sure


Quick Reply
Extra
Delete
Report

no cookies?