/v/ - Video Games

Vidya Gaems

Index Catalog Archive Bottom Refresh
Mode: Reply
Options
Subject
Message

Max message length: 8000

Files

Max file size: 32.00 MB

Max files: 5

Supported file types: GIF, JPG, PNG, WebM, OGG, and more

E-mail
Password

(used to delete files and postings)

Misc

Remember to follow the rules

The backup domain is located at 8chan.se. .cc is a third fallback. TOR access can be found here, or you can access the TOR portal from the clearnet at Redchannit 2.0.



8chan.moe is a hobby project with no affiliation whatsoever to the administration of any other "8chan" site, past or present.

(215.16 KB 1067x785 anon proud to be a gamergay.png)

Meta Thread Anonymous 06/09/2020 (Tue) 19:34:04 Id: a120a4 No. 25719
Keep all of the board drama, autism, site issues, feedback and shitting on the website administration here. Thank you.
>>404933 Write that again, but proofread it before you post it.
Well what we've determined is that d597fb needs to go back to Something Awful, 8fec89 et.al. needs to neck himself, and I need to take a fist full of sleeping pills and/or antidepressants. Unfortunately I don't have either of those things or I would livestream it right now. I hate everyone in this thread, including myself. Good night. I hope China starts WWIII while I'm asleep.
>>404936 Lol, none of those were right. Have a good night torposter, get a good night's rest.
>>404936 I'll neck myself if you lead by example, no need to overdose on pills. I'll be eagerly awaiting the livestream link.
(146.75 KB 1280x720 1537045449.jpg)

>>404936 China would die if they tried to start WW3.
>>404947 I think the USA would die with it at this point. Like the first 2 world wars crippled and killed the old empires, the third (and 4th?) world war(s) would cripple/kill the modern empires. You can "win", but at great cost to your nation's future. America and China are both massive countries with an ocean separating each other. It will be a brutal, bloody affair, possibly even a stalemate. The real question isn't whether the US or China would "win" WWIII or WWIV, but who would replace them at the forefront of the world stage when it's all said and done.
>>404951 >It will be a brutal, bloody affair, possibly even a stalemate. You seriously overestimate the ability of the Chinese military, who has never won a single war land or sea in the entire history of the country, instead spinning various defeats and retreats as "victories".
>>404972 I'm taking into account the absolute state of the current US military. Maybe that big budget will carry the day, but the leadership is either so incapable they can't properly retreat from a country, or they let it be a shitshow on purpose for some reason or another (provoking yet another forever war, perhaps?).
>/v/ becoming unusable because of /b/ pedonigger and herd nigger spillover Thanks acid, this is great.
>>405576 /v/ has already been unusable for a long time with a corrupt and incompetent mod team memory holing conversations or thoughts they dont like harder than a 4chan mod on their best day. this place is dead and has been for a reason.
<<405581 Reported and filtered pedonigger. Also I think I'm going to take a break from this place, maybe after a few months of pedoniggers and herd niggers shitting up the place it will shut down and a new place will pop up with a better admin.
>>405584 No one wants your gay ass here.
>>405584 Could always hang out of the other sites.
>>405619 *on one
>/hebe/ still exists Hello, I would like to know how to delete /hebe/. The world needs a hero, like me. >>405584 >maybe after a few months of pedoniggers and herd niggers shitting up the place Anon, /hebe/ has been up for a long time now.
>>406188 You would have really had a shitfit if you were here earlier to see the CP that stayed up for hours before a global got around to deleting it. Might as well get rid of this board too.
Why do you faggots have to be so insufferable about your fetishes? I don't give a shit if you like/hate loli or futa or yuri or whatever but at least keep that shit to yourself, I don't need to go into a thread and see 3dpd CP or someone sperging out about yuri/dykes/lesbians/whatever or going MMMMM I WISH SHE HAD A COCK AND WOULD SPLIT MY ASS WITH IT. Please. I just want to talk about video games.
>>406196 There's plenty of sanitized platforms out there that can give you what you want.
>>406197 I didnt realoze BBC pedocock was about VIDEOGAMES Its tertiary at best
(2.05 MB 3508x4743 kaine dandon fuga.jpeg)

>>406196 but what if girlcock is an integral component to the character
>>406251 Then you find and kill the person responsible for creating it, because communist sabbateans have no place in human society.
>>406197 There aren't, no. All other platforms force compliance with accepting all degeneracy. Instant bans result if you don't.
>>406196 >>>/vg/ talks about video games, BO says he'll delete cake.
>>406266 Do you expect anyone to believe if you go to 4chan or reddit's video game boards that you'd find people posting lewd lolis and girls with dicks and derailing threads to talk about how much they love being a faggot and the only people that get banned are the ones who voice their disagreement?
>>406196 cunny
>>406625 I think that's what he means. Last I checked this was /v/ the video game board not /v/: Loli and faggotry, maybe video games if we have time for it, but mostly little girl pussy and shota cock. It just gets tiresome after a while.
>>406627 The more you complain the more I will post.
>>406629 >I say something you're going to post. >I say nothing, you're still going to post Wow, did you used to work for Telltale games? Because I really feel like my choice matters here.
>>406631 No one cares what is posted outside the GG threads. Cope nigger. Also cunny.
>>406627 Last I checked this site only exists because its users valued their ability to post drawings of little girls more than they valued retaining what little userbase still remained on 8kun at the time. Losing large segments of it to other sites on the webring was a worthy sacrifice so long as you could still post the latest vidya loli. Not that you can even do that though, something like this will still get deleted by Mark because his desire to fuck her makes him uncomfortable, and everyone knows priority #1 of this board is ensuring Mark's comfort.
>>406637 So, if I understand what you're saying, go to any other video game board on the webring to actually talk about video games, come here if I want to jerk off to loli and shitpost, got it.
>>406638 Well you can't realistically talk about anything on webring sites because they're all so dead. You might get lucky and mention something the other 5 people there are also interested in and actually have a thread that moves for once, but otherwise you'll try and talk about a game you want to talk about and maybe a week later someone might reply.
>>406644 same shit here, look at all the corpses in the catalog
(152.34 KB 585x415 kitty panties.png)

>>406637 First and foremost, we lost like half to two-thirds of 8chan's population when the site died, took months to come back, then nobody knew what the fuck an 8kun was. Secondly, msot of the bunkers didn't want to come back, cutting the concentrated numbers further, and thirdly this site didn't even exist when codemonkey declared loli pictoram non grata; most of us bailed to fatchan and only came here when that one went belly up. All of that aside, the site exists to be able to create boards and also be more stable then every dime-a-dozen alt-chan that faggot Patch ever cranked out and then cut down because he's terrible at making communities but he keeps fucking trying his luck.
>>406651 8chan was only at around 10-20% of its former population by the time cloudflare took it down, trying to place all the blame on the downtime and people not knowing 8kun exists is just disingenuous. Especially when you immediately follow it by mentioning all the bunkers that willingly chose not to come back because the downtime served as a convenient way to finally cut ties. If this sites existence and its users coming here has nothing to do with loli then why did mark leave 8kun and fund this site instead? If it banned loli tomorrow would nothing change because its real purpose in your eyes is its board creation and stability?
(269.92 KB 827x1169 erin train booth.jpg)

>>406659 I would say loli matters just as much as if we were to ban people for saying nigger and faggot; it's about freedom to do things that aren't explicitly illegal. I'd also say that the only appreciable difference between here and most of the webring is board creation and maybe the concept of a board owner rather than a global mod that may be appointed or removed at the discretion of the site admin. I think the only reason this site edges out population compared to the others is kikeboy acting as a beacon, for better or worse.
Who the fuck even cares about loli anyway? Jim's a shitter who kills communities to stroke his ego and pander to his precious qniggers. That should be reason enough to leave even if he were a cunnysseur himself.
>>406662 If this site was providing a free platform to do things that aren't explicitly illegal I'm confident it would be winning back the 99% of former 8chan users that have disappeared. This site provides just as much freedom to what its current userbase wants as 8kun provides to its userbase of Qboomers, and neither are capable of growing beyond those demographics because it's purely catering to them at the expense of others. I'd argue that the only reason this site edges out population compared to webring sites is because its taken the 8chan name and is riding off its coat tails like Jim did for years. There's just much less faith in the name now than there was then, and the administration here shows no signs of wanting to rekindle that faith.
>>406675 And you're the one who now spends an equal amount of time complaining that this site needs to ban more things as if that will solve any problem aside from your inability to handle people liking something you don't like. What happened to you leaving this place for a few months?
(49.23 KB 826x279 meanwhile on halfchan.png)

>>406673 The whole reason 8chan got populated to begin with was Gamergate and the wind came out of those sails five fucking years ago, which lines up with your hot fact that 90% of the population had meandered away by the time cloudflare donkey punched the site. The only reason anybody stuck around up to that point was people are lazy and complacent, and odds are good most of the people that didn't come back settled into 4chan again since it's still super-populated and decent enough for shitpost opinions. The reason nobody is flooding into the site now is nobody gives a fuck to flee 4chan again maybe if/when the next moderator scandal breaks out we'll get a influx if newfags, and boy won't that be a time, but until then we aren't exactly gonna drum up a whole shitload of traffic from nowhere but i assure you the people we could theoretically get would still be less if we did something so completely fucking faggotrocious as banning loli just to make goon-tier niggers like you content. Go squat on 8kun if you like, the rest of us left it for a reason; enjoy your boomers, polocks, and hypnotism fetishists.
>>406687 hope springs eternal; also maybe someone else will read my walls of text and be encouraged to call him out as a flaming shitbiscuit next time
>>406684 I think I just have more faith in the users that left 4chan in that they did it out of principle and not because of one subject they wanted to discuss but couldn't, which is why 8chan had thriving boards on a variety of different subjects that had nothing to do with gamergate and also had 4chan equivalents that people could have just as easily gone to instead. Those users are long gone now that those principles have been violated by Jim and continue to be violated on this site, which is why the only users that remain here are the ones who almost exclusively discuss things in the gamergate thread and go to other sites for anything else leaving the rest of the site dead. If your reasoning was sound then this is what 8chan would have looked like from the beginning.
>>406692 I bet you'd love a reddit downvote system that would filter me automatically for having an unpopular opinion.
>>406691 We had a reason, it was Gamergate, it came and went as all things do and now they all went back to fagchan. I assume the reason we had a wide variety of boards was they came with either /v/ or /pol/ and branched out with their interests, which was mostly being gay furries as unsurprising as that is from all the Klonoa threads. Most people tend to find sites that suit them, and if you really dislike this site you're welcome if not encouraged to leave; i doubt you'll find a more populated place on the ring btu maybe you could mince on down to kohlchan's int board and pretend like you fit in there. My reasoning is perfectly sound, you just have your own answer and refuse to accept anything that deviates from it: we got populated from a movement not unlike who chanology filled 7chan, we stayed populated because people are too lazy to move or improve, we died from downtime and rebranding, we fractured because nobody fucking likes or trusts anybody else. Welcome to a brave new age.
>>406711 My answer accounts for the fact that the site came under new leadership which resulted in a drastic change in how it was run and after that the site hemorrhaged users nonstop year after year. Your answer pretends that wasn't even a factor and chocks up the entirety of the declining population of 8chan to gamergate and its declining relevance despite the fact that gamergate was only ever a small minority of the sites activity. Why should I accept your answer when it requires willful ignorance?
(44.11 KB 976x579 Untitled.png)

(50.28 KB 1021x585 Untitled2.png)

>>406717 >/v/ was one of the top boards next to /pol/ and /b/ >somehow the reason that bought /v/ to the site was a minority of the activity >meanwhile the one board that mean ol' uncle jim nuked was less than a tenth of the vidya board >flash forward years later, the sites still about the same size You are either really retarded or completely full of shit. Kill yourself and save an angry mob the effort.
(320.79 KB 1178x1212 65888827_p0.png)

>>406667 >Willful ignorance Speaking of, the real willful ignorance is that 8chan in its heyday was absolutely fine with a massive and very active /hebe/ full of racy but non-explicit images of minors. Yet Acid and many other claim legal risks and the necessity of "borderline equals over the line" policy on such images, despite this site being more secure than OG 8chan ever was. The inconsistency of this position on the rules in face of the real facts of the issue is glaringly apparent. But other than pointing it out to make newniggers upset that pedos even exist on the internet, I couldn't really care as long as I can post loli. 2D is ultimately superior in the end after all.
(98.01 KB 950x1459 2016.png)

(100.31 KB 945x1462 2018.png)

>>406722 Are you disputing that gamergate discussion was a minority of 8chan's activity? I don't see how you could, the majority of /v/s activity alone was discussing video games, not gamergate. Here's a breakdown in post count on 2016 and 2018, the site had lost roughly half of it's activity between those 2 years alone and by august 2018 they shut off the recording of these statistics all together because it only ever showcased a constant decline.
>>406734 >Your logic that because something didn't get someone in trouble previously that it won't in the future isn't very strong. My logic is just based on that. It's the probably that Acid would get any heat for it, on top of the fact that this site is more secure. Additionally, everyone and their mother has already stated how that site was a very different case for a variety of reasons, not the least of which was the fact that lots of money was involved because he was selling the stories, meaning the law could extract lots of money from him. >But I'm sure Acid wants to go down as the infamous admin of the nazi imageboard 8channel.com for having images of half naked 12 years on his servers. If you want to say he'd be targeted for other reasons with illegal material on the site as an excuse, piracy taking place on the site with absolutely no action whatsoever from the moderation would also be illegal activity he's aiding and abetting, wouldn't it? And that's explicitly illegal activity, not gray area shit like loli or a 12 year old in a swimsuit.
>>406738 >there's no way that /v/ could ever had housed the majority of gamergate threads or discussion especially not now when threads are still being made there to this day, nor is there any possible relation to gamergate threads being restricted on 4chan and several thousand people leaving that site for 8chan >nope the site was all about that sweet /hebe/ action which is why when that board got kicked the site immediately continued to exist as usual for years until some dude killed beaners in a tex-mex walmart
>>406742 Not to mention the fact that acid walked back the very rule that protected him against the same law that was used against the guy hosting pedophile stories. So I guess acid is willing to go down as the infamous admin of 8chan that has pedoshit on his servers. So much for that argument. >>406745 This petty attempt at strawmanning me now that you have nothing left to say in the face of contradictory evidence is pretty pathetic, if your goal in this is to have other people read what you have to say and be on your side you aren't doing yourself any favors here.
>>406749 Then you have walked away from an internet argument, making me the winner and therefore correct.
>>406752 Address something I've said and I'll respond to it, by arguing with a figment of your own imagination you are walking away from an argument with me.
>>406754 So? If the latter is gone, they can still use the former, and you're not being creative enough. <Alt-right extremist website 8chan 2.0 shut down for illegal copyright infringement <Copyright law is getting more and more restrictive, here's why's that's a good thing <8chan successor taken down for rampant illegal activity
(29.29 KB 586x974 360 away.jpg)

>>406756 >lol im not walking away im rotating with the earth while you move backwards i totes win 4 sure
(7.55 MB 413x529 acid_juice.gif)

>>406756 >>406762 Just kiss already.
>>406767 sorry i only fuck on the first date
>>404762 Didn't affect my area, thank god.
Why do you allow the newfags to fester and why do you not allow the community to self moderate, Mark? Do you not want a community to retain a sense of identity or do you think this board should be overrun with cuckchan and twitter garbage?
(412.67 KB 1080x1080 588a92.jpeg)

>>406673 >do things that aren't explicitly illegal Like what? Exactly what do you want to do and discuss here?
Mods, I've been sending you guys reports about this over the past few days but as of right now there's 15 GamerGate threads on the catalog. Someone really needs to move the older threads to /gg/ as soon as possible. Seriously, you guys really should be doing this every time there's 8 or more GamerGate threads on the catalog. That would be way more efficient instead of waiting until there's a pages' worth of GG threads on the catalog.
>>406196 Nice attempt trying to conflate CP with drawn/rendered stuff.
>>408259 the faggot who spamming his 3dcg shit was conflating it with 3dpd himself though.
>>408264 *spammed
>>408259 > Realistic depiction of children is the same as pedophilia You should eat a bullet.
>>408270 He said the exact opposite of what you just accused him of saying.
(88.51 KB 280x320 96754.png)

>>406673 >>408115 Well? I'm still waiting for an answer.
(5.74 MB 720x480 Brap queen.webm)

>>408340 Were the Yoshi panties too much? haha
>>408284 Its not real, its a representation. There are lines put together to recreate something. Its not a real child, no real children are being hurt or trafficked as child sex models (which do happen in real life with real pedophiles)
>>408347 I'm going to address the retorts >Loli artists using real CP as reference material That is a separate issue and doesn't suddenly make the fictional child real. The outrage should come against the people making the actual stuff not the drawn kind. Attacking loli would be like attacking Truman Capote for writing In Cold Blood and not the actual murderers. >"People talk about it like the real thing!" Anons are edgy degenerates, what else is new. Especially when they know it gets under people's skin.
>>408115 Well for starters the rules of this board not being totally arbitrary would be nice. I was sure that image of the pragmata loli would get deleted like images like it have in the past but they didn't this time solely to try and prove me wrong, with rules based on law that wouldn't fly. Or the fact that they've deleted all my posts just because it's me posting them on one occasion yet they didn't in the last conversation I had, it's totally schizophrenic. I can't even seem to reliably break the rules even when I'm trying to, and on the other hand get all my posts deleted over the most trivial shit.
>It's been many months >/hebe/ still exists
(1.09 MB 320x240 MonkeGuts.mp4)

>>406196 Don't forget where you are anon. You know what my fetishes are? Handholding, genuine love, marriage, monogamy, snuggling, impregnation, pregnant women bellies, seeing my irl waifu smile and anal I am fine with tits and ass of any size as long as they aren't obese, saggy, super veiny or have shitloads of cellulite. All in all I just want to be loved, I want physical contact with a woman who was strong feelings for me as I do for her.
>>409078 i hate almost all of your fetishes and love ntr your waifu will be raped in front of you by me
>>409080 Netorare, loli, toddler, gangrape, mindbreak, inflation, parasyte, eggs, birthing, cheating, corruption, prostitution, orc, elf, public use
>>409082 Everything on there but toddler and inflation is about right, yeah.
(17.14 KB 299x266 ClipboardImage.png)

>>409082 eggs? >>409083 toddler unironically makes me nauseous. out of any kind of human female to find hot fucking BABIES of all things should not even fucking be on your list you are mentally ill anon, i feel so sorry for you.
>>409100 I have a wide arrange of dark fetishes, anon. Its not everyday, but if i feel like it, there it is. The egg thing is when the elf gets impregnanted by a turd eating monster that lays its eggs on her asshole and she births them by shitting them
>>409100 I specifically said it wasn'ton my list, anon.
(2.90 MB 1280x720 milf tomboy.mp4)

>>409078 My fetish are videogames. I want to shove a whole wiimote inside Erin's vagina.
(150.98 KB 1116x1314 8moe vs 8kun.png)

>>409165 Why this site know how long I'm browsing shota porn for?
>>409175 In English, please.
(67.19 KB 406x420 awwright.jpg)

>>409100 >out of any kind of human female to find hot fucking BABIES of all things should not even fucking be on your list I cant help that the Japanese made them so appealing. >you are mentally I'll Just autistic >>409082 >ntr cheating corruption These I cant find anything in though.
>>409165 Fueled by the recent spam on /b/?
>>409165 Is there some hidden board like /qresearch/ was that all this new activity is going towards? Am I alone in seeing no difference despite there being apparently 8x higher viewership than earlier in the year?
>>409080 >Everyone surprised that Anons are edgelords and degenerates. Just because society went down the shitter and degeneracy is now the status quo, it didn't suddenly turn the old social outcasts into moral people.
>>409191 >Avg. Visit Duration
Kazu sucks at Pokemon. Holy shit.
>>409196 We do have a rather large hidden board that's very active lately. It's not Qfaggotry and they're pleasant and keep to themselves.
>>409234 I'm not a global or anything, but I really want this site to succeed. Best of luck codexx/acid. Also I wouldn't mind becoming a global just to take care care of the cheese pizza, but that's your call.
>>409234 >We do have a rather large hidden board [deebly goncerned]
>>409237 You have to pinky promise not to let feds into your apartment again first so they can creep anon post histories.
(169.86 KB 1200x1200 Asuka pokemon\.jpeg)

>>409237 Nein. I appreciate the gesture, but we both know anons would freak and never let you live it down lol. We finally got to the point where there's no overlap between individual board staff and globals, and I think that's healthier for the site. Conflicts of interest, yadda yadda. We should be taking on more globals sometime soon, too. Still, thanks for offering.
>>409244 I know man, just let me know if you need anything. I'm here for you.
>>409234 >>409244 Acid please clean up all the shit being posted on /b/ See >>409220
>>409234 >very large hidden board here that I don't know of Very concerned, this cannot be good
>>409234 Cool. The only "hidden board" I've ever been on is halfchan's /trash/, and I only learned about that because of Snootgame if I'm honest.
>>409237 >Also I wouldn't mind becoming a global just to take care care of the cheese pizza No. t. Another BO.
>>409237 No, mark. t. yet another BO
>>409256 Like which pictures? I've been deleting a lot of pictures on /b/ that I thought were too much. Instead of just deleting threads and such like the PGT it would be a lot better to have a reference of why something is being deleted so it can be properly moderated within the board itself instead having globals having to babysit. I have the posts from Codexx as reference--
>>409268 I don't know specifically, I'm just relaying the information second hand. I do know that /b/ is having a kiddy spam problem right now and that /b/ needs more vols to deal with the problem. Like you said ideally they should be native /b/ vols instead of having purely to rely on globals.
>>409271 > /b/ is having a kiddy spam problem right now Yes, and the board owner is not very active right now. I've been deleting things pretty much all day, and asking the BO to hand it over to me whenever he is around (not new to the board but new to jannying for it, so who knows if he will give it--I've moderated plenty of other places though). Just prefer guidance over silent deletions.
>>409272 >Yes, and the board owner is not very active right now. I've been deleting things pretty much all day, and asking the BO to hand it over to me whenever he is around That sounds like a really good solution. I hope he does.
>>409268 >>409256 I'm confused as well. I can't tell if anons are seeing images before someone (local or global) arrives to clean it up, if their standards for what should be removed differ from what we're looking for, or if it doesn't actually exist and they're just saying it does. Either way, it seems like nobody is reporting it, at least not to globals. Every thread cannot be checked manually, so reports are very helpful. Someone has also been reporting posts with professional porn. The assumption with those is that they check out legally. Additionally, someone has been spamming galleries of adults with a pic of a child in the middle. I'm guessing the attempt here is to blur the line/make false reports and hope it moves the line somehow. It's pretty obvious bait, though. >>409271 >Like you said ideally they should be native /b/ vols instead of having purely to rely on globals. If /b/ continues to get spammed we will ask them to recruit more mods. >>409272 >Yes, and the board owner is not very active right now. If they're inactive and unable to recruit then we will consider passing the role on to one of the current mods, at least for the duration of his absence. >Just prefer guidance over silent deletions. If you need guidance, you're always free to send and e-mail or ping us on IRC, or to ask on /site/. You can also globally report posts (even ones that have been trashed) and ask for guidance there, although it'll be difficult to send a clear message back outside of ban/warn messages. But I'm always up for a conversation on where the reasonable limits are, and we had a good long one with Head when he was BO of /b/.
>>409274 He asked already, days ago. and I've been posting for it since >>>/b/60467 so we'll see.
>>409275 There is no reasonable tolerance for images of children on an imageboard for the exact same reason there's no tolerance for images on children on /hebe/. You already understand the position and hold it yourself, you just don't apply it consistently.
>>409278 My opinion is that any image of children (clothed or full on pedoshit) put on a nsfw board should be considered nsfw. I'll let you and the administration keep duking it out, just wanted to give 2 dimes for my time.
>>409279 *should be considered CSAM and nuked from orbit
>>409278 I don't think "zero tolerance" policies have ever worked for anything, ever. Deleting all images of children regardless of context would be absurd, and at the very minimum would require inconsistent carve-outs and exceptions anyways. We deliberately made the rule more restrictive than the law precisely so that inconsistent application or judgement would still land the content safely on the right side of it. >>409279 It's straightforward and clear, and was up for consideration previously. I believe the concern was that some pictures of children are obviously not an issue, or are part of memes, etc, and we're trying to avoid banning those on any NSFW board. But if the current guidance continues to be a problem then it would probably be the logical next step. It's far better than a sitewide "no pics of children under any circumstances", which just seems tonedeaf. That said, I think the current guidance would imply that pics of children on NSFW boards require them to pass a higher bar as a result of the board's context.
>>409283 Well, glad to hear you're considering it. Banning kids entirely would suck, we'd miss out on a lot of fun memes. where would the Internet be without memes like this?
>>409283 >Deleting all images of children regardless of context would be absurd, and at the very minimum would require inconsistent carve-outs and exceptions anyways. Except you aren't deleting them regardless of the context. The context is that we're on an adult imageboard. I'm curious what contexts you think images of underage little girls feet are morally permissible to have on on a website. And I'm even more curious about the specific board topics where this is permissible behavior. Everyone knows what's going on. You don't need a 100% absolutely infallible rule to deal with pedoniggers constantly spamming images of underage children. It's blatantly obvious when a post is some innocuous meme picture that happens to have a kid in it and when someone is spamming pictures of little girls wearing short shorts while talking about how much they want to fuck them. The fact I have to explain this to another fully grown adult man makes me feel like I'm having a fucking fever dream or something.
>>409295 It is incredibly strange. For me, every interaction on an imageboard is strange, the weirdness of it all has never gone away for me.
>>409295 Have you considered that some people on this site don't give a fuck about children? Can you give me a reason why I should give a fuck about children?
>>409279 >My opinion is that any image of children (clothed or full on pedoshit) put on a nsfw board should be considered nsfw. >>409283 >That said, I think the current guidance would imply that pics of children on NSFW boards require them to pass a higher bar as a result of the board's context. I think that's a good idea since bad faith actors are going to keep pushing the line. The administration and all the BOs have given such people months to self moderate and those bad eggs flatly refuse to do so. Most importantly it won't impact other anons who do post in good faith.
The position that we use can be basically boiled down to "don't post IRL kids in a porn-related context, or make posts that try to change the context of a legal kid pic into something lewd." It's pretty straightforward, if people follow it.
(142.08 KB 480x360 Faith - dab.mp4)

>>409300 Hooray, compromise that still dabs on paraphiliacs!
>>409302 Can we post kids getting stomped into the dirt?
>>409302 Right, so no children in a Pedo General Thread, for example--? Also, some of those pictures you deleted were adults. Another issue I suppose: not all people are easy to tell the age of.
>>409306 >Another issue I suppose: not all people are easy to tell the age of. Now that's an actual difficult thing to deal with. Maybe there should be a global rule that requires proof of legal age to be posted with any borderline looking adults and failing that mods will err on the side of caution or something like that. >>409306 >Right, so no children in a Pedo General Thread I would assume axiomatically "no". That's how I would mod the thread anyway.
(1.18 MB 1080x1080 1611673219049-330.jpg)

>>409310 That's fair; but if they get reported globally--that's what I mean. If I personally don't know then I'd just delete it as you said, especially if in a sexual context. >>409302 is pretty straightforward to me and seems rather easy to moderate based on. Pic related which was deleted--
>>409316 In general, seeing minors even in a sfw setting that looks like a candid photo or whatever, it feels out of place on an imageboard to me. Unless its a meme or something. Like that pic unsettles me
>>409319 She's 19, Anon (18 in the picture, though).
>>409322 That's sort of the problem I guess. She's one of those 18 year olds that can look 14, at least from certain angles. There just needs to be a proof of age thread or something for people like her to have relevant info and hotlinked back to individual posts or batches of posts so that it will be clear to any posters, vols, BOs, globals, admins, stray feds, etc. of the complete legality of their pics that are posted. That's not an undue burden I wouldn't think.
>>409332 >There just needs to be a proof of age thread or something for people like her to have relevant info and hotlinked back to individual posts or batches of posts so that it will be clear to any posters, vols, BOs, globals, admins, stray feds, etc. of the complete legality of their pics that are posted. That's not an undue burden I wouldn't think. >That's not an undue burden I wouldn't think. Holy shit, I want to just think you're being sarcastic, but with Poe's Law in effect, I just can't be sure anymore.
Acid you need to ban tor & do something about enforcing against the actual pedo posts being spammed.
>>409337 What in my post seemed wrong to you?
>Naw if it looks underage delete it. Problem solved. Heard this exact line of argument before...
>>409344 I'll amend that with >if it looks underage, and the poster can't prove that it isn't, delete it.
>>409332 I've already done all that in the past for Alina when the previous Board Owner kept deleting me, though I highly doubt many others would be as autistic about it as I am-- >>409341 No normal person would go through the effort, and I doubt many moderators care enough to have ages and proof thrown at them for a girl who looks 14--it's just a waste of time to make it "official". My main question was with the actual kid-posting which Root answered in an easy-to-follow way.
They're doing it again. >>>/b/67953 Scroll down to the bottom. Acid you're simply going to have to do something about this problem on /b/. You can't put it off any longer. It doesn't need to be dealt with in a month, or in a couple of weeks, it needs to be dealt with right now. Make some changes, what ever those changes are, to stop this.
(19.67 KB 452x622 home page cancer.png)

All you have to do is take a look at the home page or over board to see the fucking problem. Just take a look at this shit. FIX IT
Seriously this shit is beginning to glow so hard that I'm almost at the point of not being comfortable posting or browsing here anymore. The overboard is unusable because of this shit. There was no reason to allow it to get this bad. Fix it or you're going to loose the few remaining decent anons who post here. As a stop gap measure you need to make pedo posting banned site wide. Seriously you banned some video game CG characters and even text stories but you won't put an end to this blatant gaping ongoing problem?
>>409453 FUCK OFF PEDO
(12.04 KB 528x352 more cancer.png)

And they're still at it.
>>409455 What can be done about it at this point?
>>409457 Nuke /hebe/ and put /b/ into text only mode for a week or two and threaten to nuke it if it doesn't follow the rules and fast. Failing that anons here just need to migrate for better waters where they don't naively tolerate unironic child abusers. This has been going on for fucking months. Acid needs to put an end to it now. >>409459 Fuck off.
They know exactly what they're doing too.
>>409465 Well if you faggots could self moderate even a tiny bit then it wouldn't come to this would it? Fuck you.
>>409460 >>409460 >child abusers it really is funny how emotional you get as regards this topic and how you subconsciously use the "violent video games are the cause of violence/are consumed by violent individuals" argument anyway, they certainly do need to be dealt with. i for one just want to talk about vidya here what i'm wondering is where they're coming in from and why it's ramping up as of late. you say nuke /hebe/ for instance,but didn't that only have 5 role players for a bit before moving offsite and dying here?what's the connection? >>409465 anon, don't justify what they're doing. they're putting the site at risk, and there's a lot more places they could be pulling this
>>409457 >>409459 >>409465 At bare fucking minimum pedo threads of any kind can be banned site wide regardless of board. Just don't give them a comfortable place to congregate and feel welcome. Banning /hebe/ back on old 8chan was the one singular intelligent thing that that fat boomer pig fucking retard ever did.
>>409468 >you say nuke /hebe/ for instance,but didn't that only have 5 role players for a bit before moving offsite and dying here?what's the connection? It's more of a symbolic thing at this point. Nuking the pedo general on /b/ would actually have some benefit though I think. They need to know that they aren't welcome and aren't wanted here. Then they can leave in a huff and go shit up some other image board.
>>409470 >spam material that could get the site canned >"hurr newfags" come on man again, it's not like there aren't other places you could be doing this
>>409471 i'm fairly certain this place is some sort of honeypot. the pedo thread did get deleted fairly recently, but came back up again after a bit.
>>409468 >what i'm wondering is where they're coming in from and why it's ramping up as of late Here's your answer >>409470 >niGGer It's /cow/ or revoltards or whatever. They're just want to destroy the site, either by getting it taken down or by driving legitimate posters away and they're using Acids "free speach absolutism" autism against him and us. And you're doing a masterful job of it too by the way.
>>409475 calling it an overreaction is really disingenuous at this point
>>409475 >Just report shit and it will be deleted Yeah maybe in a couple of hours. Maybe up to 8 hours later or more if it's a lazy day for the vols and no one shows up to moderate.
>>409476 i'm not so sure, to be honest. some of the names being thrown around are from other placed
>>409481 I don't actually care who they are or what their ultimate goal is. I just call them /cow/ or revoltards because they act like those groups and use the same lingo as those groups. I just know that who ever they are they're here to do harm or they're here and don't care if they do harm. >>409482 Acid's going to do that "eventually". At the very minimum he could put /b/ and hebe/ into text only until they hire enough vols to cover the site and then allow image posting there again. I'm just talking about a temporary, stopgap measure for God's sake.
>>409488 I don't think he's even attempted to add any new jannys yet.
>>409493 Or something. But yeah adding a bunch of new jannys to cover all timeslots overlapping would probably solve 99% of the problem and if one of them started going overboard then he could just de mod them. But no apparently adding a janitor to a fragment of a fragment of an imageboard is harder and more involved than getting a supreme court nominee through hostile congress.
(7.52 KB 536x193 look at this shit.png)

>>409482 >>409485 >>409492 >>409495 The search for globals will start very soon. Both Acid and Parias have been busy (and Acid is still looking after his cat, which has fallen ill). I do not make moderation decisions, so it's up to their schedules. I believe they have agreed on a strategy and just need to draft the post. I wouldn't be surprised if it shows up in the next couple days.
>>409505 The fact this shit comes in waves like incontinence does furthers my belief it's a bunch of outsiders purposely fucking things up.
>>409553 It's two independent groups: the Cutie Garden refugees who are mostly just pedos who want to share what they love, and the herdnigger retards that just want to cause issues.
>>409558 >the Cutie Garden refugees Really? I'd have assumed they'd be more courteous. I know the totspammer was driven out of there, and I saw Cat-kun posting here, I guess.
>>409575 >Really? I'd have assumed they'd be more courteous. They are. That's the reason I asked to Janny /b/ and why I am pushing for Board Owner. I've dealt with both groups on other image boards. The herdniggers are the ones posting CP and aggressively pushing the "pedo agenda" in order to have the board bootstomped. The Cutie Garden people are actual posters who contribute to the board (not just in pedo threads).
>>409234 It's the fucking blacked hentai board isn't it
>>409582 That'd be something to see.
>>409576 >>409575 What in God's name is the Cutie Garden?
(34.74 KB 400x400 TbLgdR0i_400x400.jpg)

>We do have a rather large hidden board that's very active lately.
>>409614 It was a clearweb pedo site that closed down somewhat recently, leaving the users looking for new places to post (here, 88chan, Smolbox)--
(98.09 KB 300x344 mosely toast 2.png)

Also apparently there's an active vore board that popped up out of nowhere? Fuckin' furries.
>>409614 It was the site that the tripfags who co-opted the pedo thread on 8chan moved to when Jim took over. The silver lining to that shitshow was finally being rid of them.
>>409629 As far as I know, /vore1/ and /tkr/ are seeking shelter from 8kun, which has been falling apart entirely.
>>409638 I'm guessing after Trump lost and the whole August happening was a LARP the Q movement has been dissipating and as a consequence the site on a whole is imploding?
>>409656 Not sure what the state of Q Cope is. But the site's backend was seemingly hot-glued together when it relaunched as 8kun, and either nobody knows how to fix it or nobody cares. As of some time last week, most images on most boards do not load at all. Totally dead links. Weirdly, it's not quite all images, so they either have a second media server that is still operational or they've done something else to mitigate. They've had periods like this before, but never lasting this long. Additionally, some things have been broken for well over a year now. I recall helping /fast/ with their move and we ran into issues where threads would display out-of-date versions of themselves until forcibly updated via posting, mod actions, etc. Scraping 8kun revealed a lot of problems that normal users probably didn't even notice. Unfortunately, with images busted it may not be feasible to migrate boards anymore.
>>409625 >>409631 I'll go ahead and put that in the "probably better if I hadn't asked" part of my brain. >>409656 That and Jim's (literal) chump change. Hopefully for good >>409663 >Unfortunately, with images busted it may not be feasible to migrate boards anymore. Would it still be possible to migrate a board, if only in text?
>>409638 What is /tkr/ anyway?
>>409688 Tickle fetish, it seems.
>>409673 >Would it still be possible to migrate a board, if only in text? Of course. Any data available can be scraped and imported. I wish I did more full scrapes of the site just in case, but I wasn't expecting it to just lose all media immediately. At least we got /tikilounge/.
>>409656 That and the constant technical problems that only got worse when the remaining non-Qtards left and Ron resigned from being the dev and admin. >>409663 >Not sure what the state of Q Cope is Pretty bad. Their activity has decreased from 600-1000PPH to "just" 250 since the boomers stormed into Capital Hill (and did nothing but take photos and get shoot), with spambots and connection errors making their experience worse.
Ban /interracial/ and BLACKED posters
>>409663 >But the site's backend was seemingly hot-glued together when it relaunched as 8kun, and either nobody knows how to fix it or nobody cares. Why WOULD they care? Ron quit the site and purely by coincidence all Q-LARP posts stopped being made forever that very same day. They ran their graft for three years straight. They milked boomers for all they were worth. The site doesn’t mean anything to them (it literally never did; they stole it for a reason), and it’s not even worth their time and effort to keep running. They’ll let the domain expire silently and some leftist group will buy it, take it over, wipe the code, and have it redirect to fur affinity or something.
(41.31 KB 195x195 [002010].jpg)

>>410053 This is too based, acid won't do it.
>>410183 Based on what?
>>410187 It's based on a true story.
(201.29 KB 321x308 nigger (1).png)

>>410187 Based in heroic justice against degenerate fetishes.
>>410190 How do you define degenerate and non-degenerate fetishes? Having fetishes at all is degenerate when you get right down to it.
>>410193 I suppose having fetishes that can end in reproduction would qualify as non-degenerate.
>>410205 >Humiliation is generally the key component to a degenerate fetish. Wanting to lick a girls armpits isn't all that degenerate, but wanting to be humiliated by watching women get fucked by niggers is. So what about femdom?
>>410225 I don't want to have sex with Joe Rogan.
(9.74 MB 2894x4093 Asuka back off.jpeg)

Your Attention, please. >>>/site/3983
Edited last time by Acidadmin on 09/08/2021 (Wed) 03:51:42.
>>410250 Nice link retard
>>410215 >What about femdom Doesn't necessarily have to be about humiliation. There is such a thing as gentle femdom, which you could argue is about humiliation through infantilization, but generally still can play out with no humiliation aspects. Domination doesn't have to mean humiliation. Cuckoldry and NTR is always about humiliation of the Cuckold, as much as the three letter subhumans try to say, "Nahh man, it's about the DRAMA", to which I say, yes, the drama of seeing a man humiliated and having his loved one taken away from him with the implication that he is an inferior partner.
Nice imageboard you got here I'll check in here and there, not on life support but need to hit at least 300 PPH to get me seriously interested So I'm guessing most of the boards on here that receive traffic are fetish related or pornographic in some nature? Whatever, wishing you all the best Is there an active /d/ like board?
Some webms I find the site eats even if I go through an uploading process. Any idea why? examples: https://files.catbox.moe/1vgkuu.webm https://files.catbox.moe/n69gbi.webm Femdom's kind of hot if the sub's also a woman
>>410260 So what, femdom is only bad if the guy feels humiliated, even if the exact same exactions happen? I think I agree more with >>410196 If no one else fucks your woman and no one is seriously harmed, and whatever weird shit you do doesn't preclude baby-making, it's okay.
>>410280 /d/ is too niche. /h/ serves the same purpose, but it's practically dead.
(123.97 KB 680x759 1437744775744.jpg)

>>410280 >he needs constant cuckchan PPH to be interested in an imageboard I know the perfect place you can fuck off to.
>>410365 >Domination loss Meaning what, femdom at first but the guy turns the tables?
>>410280 You're way too late, this board is dead as shit.
>>410280 >300 PPH Do you mean site wide or on /v/? We've hit and exceeded 300 PPH at times, we'll probably get there on a consistent basis eventually. If you mean on /v/ then anon, there are boards on halfchan that don't have that. Old 8/v/ barely had that. >/d/ There's >>>/h/ you pervert >>410391 shut up pedo
>>410408 >shut up pedo where do you think you are?
>>410416 Milfs and shortstacks are superior. Also why aren't you attracted to fully grown women or at least cute traditional women? Do you ever even go outside that often and see any? Or are you a neet who had no other choice but to become an isolated coomer of a man?
(102.26 KB 811x844 Black Mesarara.jpg)

>>410428 >Milfs and shortstacks are superior. I thought I was the only one here who likes my girls built for rough sex or even girls for that matter. Glad I'm not alone.
>>410428 >accusing me of being a coomer when you post that monstrosity from my perspective your attraction to that is what requires an explanation. not my preference for sleek and well proportioned lolis that take the sexual dimorphism between men and women to its natural conclusion.
(1.65 MB 978x1422 ClipboardImage.png)

>>410435 Counterpoint: lolis got no milk.
>>410438 >has a lactation fetish cowtit lovers are the real coomers confirmed. your porn addled mind is just too fogged to see the truth. the only time you get a glimpse is in that moment of post nut clarity when you immediately close the porn tab out of shame over how shit your taste truly is.
>>410444 Someone ban this tornigger from living please.
Why the fuck are they still able to even post images what the fuck acid?
cool cp thread
>>410428 >-oomer >filename As if I needed any more proof that hagfags are braindead retards.
sdadadg
(149.08 KB 882x1200 American pasties.jpg)

(2.99 MB 2480x3508 E553S8bVgAAZkik.jpg)


(401.25 KB 1395x2038 EbLGiD7U4AElJu4.jpg)

(136.30 KB 905x1280 EWH_3SnUwAAWOf_.jpg)

>>410458 Stay mad and embrace these giant massive fertile mommy milkers. I heard that pedos are what they are because they are still mentally children and can't handle adult women. You all have permanently underdeveloped brains therefore a permanent form of mental retardation. How fucking shameful and pathetic of you guys.
>>410447 Plot twist; it's acid posting the pictures. Guess those game journos were right when they said gamergate was filled with pedophiles
>>410465 Lolis are superior. You can go back to Cuckchan now.
>>410465 >he wants to embrace mommies milkers and suck on them for their milk >yet we're the ones with underdeveloped brains the projection never ends with you does it?
>>410478 If you think doing different from what's normal is so enlightened, how about you bite down on a shotgun shell since filthy normies wouldn't do that either? Go figure the pedo is an actual fucking retard.
>>410487 >normies Keep going.
>>410487 a preference for old hags isn't normal and thats why societies that mandate it have birth rates in the toilet and have to import sand niggers and their child brides to maintain their labor force. checkmate atheists.
>thread derailed by pedos again
>>410288 test >>410428 >coomer >iToy filename
>>410581 yep, the files disappeared from my post
(231.20 KB 352x425 AIsettlesthedebate.png)

>>410250 Your Attention, please.
(13.75 KB 1024x565 Othercide.jpg)

>>410593 See it's generating the daughters from Othercide now.
(605.28 KB 920x984 its all so tiresome.png)

>>410536 Well that and some milf shitposter >>410438 >lolis got not milk Pretty sure you can find a decent amount of loli lactation images if you bother to look.
Wynaut both?
(110.00 KB 480x360 medium style .mp4)

(274.50 KB 2067x1654 pantsless ara.jpg)

(47.04 KB 545x577 E9gHF-zWYAsop0j.jpg)

>>410581 Anon I don't even know what iToy is, I got that image from here. What do you want me to say instead? Cumbrain? >>410478 Breast milk is a great source of vitamins and proteins when it comes to getting swole or being healthy in general and its even better to get it directly from the source. I want to impregnate a big tiddy girl just so I can drink her titty milk and punch that loser little shit I call a kid in the face when he tries to get a turn with her titties. Doesn't that sound absolutely rad?
>>410722 Everything you post reads like what a cuckchan nigger thinks he's supposed to sound like when posting on an imageboard based on jewtube videos about cuckchan he's watched.
>>410723 I say what I want and I don't give a shit about the opinions of torniggers. Go diddle yourself to CP somewhere else.
>>410736 Being unashamed about being a cuckchan nigger just reaffirms my post so I'm not sure what your point here is.
>>410736 Loli isn't CP, cowtit sperg.
>>410740 No some guy went and posted actual CP earlier today, had to report him myself. Lolis are fine though, I even read that hentai you posted. >>410604 >meta thread derailed by meta posts Are you retarded or what? Read OP's post before posting in this thread again.
>>410433 >>410435 Gentlemen please, there's only one way to bring piece between lolifags and arafags, the true middle path. Oyakodon
(1.72 MB 2000x1414 00.png)

>>410754 Oh, have a good day then. >>410758 Patrician.
(2.36 MB 1280x720 Dammit .mp4)

>>410754 >Read OP's post before posting in this thread again. >Keep all of the board drama, autism, site issues, feedback and shitting on the website administration here. >autism Well you got me there, I admit defeat.
>>410758 thats like saying the middleground between faggots and straight men is to have a threesome with a man and a woman.
>>410912 Not everything has a viable middle ground.
>>410984 Transistors do
>>410912 bi threesomes are hot tho
(297.78 KB 1050x570 Berserk young guts.jpg)

Here is Berserk chapter 364. Berserk is now over you guys it was a good run. https://imgur.com/a/K6mI5UN
>>411009 thanks I hate it
(374.67 KB 1920x1080 Get the fuck out of here.mp4)

>>410428 >coomer Why do you niggers not bother to try and fit in at all?
What the hell happened last night and why was i mistakenly banned
Why would anyone use this board when it's moderated so poorly it's literally the same as 4/v/, except there's a niggergate thread for some ungodly reason.
>>411050 >triggered
>>409319 Because you're a newfag election tourist NIGGER that should kill yourself promptly. >everyone clamoring to turn this site into 8kun/current year 4chan
>>411793 >torpedo
Ban /interracial/ and BLACKED posters. thanks for listening to my ted talk.
Remove /b/ and /hebe/ from the overboard I'm tired of seeing child porn when I just want to see if someone has made posts on dead unknown boards.
>>411960 Better yet, how about just being able to have a personal blacklist for the overboard that you can save in settings. It'd also be helpful if you could export it to a file too.
>>411970 I'd rather just be able to do it in the URL. >/overboard/-b-hebe I don't want to sit around creating a custom overboard for every board I want to see when I want to see new boards too that might go up day to day. I just need to remove random herd nigger dens since acid won't do it and I want my /tmp folder to stop filling up with herd nigger child porn spam.
Where the fuck is Kazu? He needs to clean up /cb/ already.
>>411881 >Trigg >ered
>>411970 >ow about just being able to have a personal blacklist for the overboard They're working on that, last I checked.
>>411978 >-b-hebe Good idea.
>>412278 Studio trigger?
I got banned for "Niggerpill" for a post i made about not supporting developers anymore. This place is going to retarded lenghts to stop people from discussing or talking about anything. Just retarded shit. Why the fuck talk about how much freedom this shithole has if you're going to deem anything niggerpilling or "fedposting".
>>412536 No one talks about muh freedoms besides Acid, and you have every ability to go and make an alternative board or use one of the already existing alternative boards. You're using cake/v/ in 2021 and expecting what exactly? How new are you dude? Complaining about getting banned on cake/v/ is like complaining about their being trash in a trashcan. Literally just don't go inside of the trashcan retard.
>>412536 I got banned for both of those before too. Mark is paranoid and retarded and seemingly wants to drive off the last bit of users he has. Oh and he lives in a house for people with mental disabilities, he's legally retarded.
>>412540 Its been getting increesingly hard to say anything without your post getting deleted or a 1 week ban for literally nothing. The post i was banned for had nothing "niggerpilling" about it. >>412542 Wasn't he stepping down? Why the fuck make that thread, jesus fucking shit.
>>412020 What the fuck? I was wondering why comfy random wasn't just called /cb/, instead of just /c/. Now I know.
>>412545 Mark has made multiple threads about quitting over the last few years. They literally never amount to anything. >>412546 Got a problem with cutebois faggot?
>>412536 Haven't been banned for "spam", "fed" or "rule 8" yet?
>>412548 Yes, the "fedposting" ban was because i wrote "violent action"
>>412550 Welcome to the club.
>>412545 One of my posts in the TGS thread got deleted even though I didn't break any rules and I was posting OC. >>412548 Thank God I'm not alone I thought I was the only one. I could have sworn that mark had somehow found out my posting style and developed some kind of autistic vendetta against me. But no, he's just fucking retarded in general. >>412550 I think perhaps his Jewish overlord handlers are telling him to suppress any kinds of descent from the goyim. Little does he know I am an American and a libertarian and I will NOT be silenced. I also have a vpn so I can ban evade whenever I wish
>>412552 I TORpost half the time for this reason specifically.
(52.42 KB 2048x1025 wew_lad.jpg)

>>412551 >>412550 >the feds are in the meta threads now wew lad
>>412552 >One of my posts in the TGS thread got deleted even though I didn't break any rules and I was posting OC. No you weren't, I just checked to be sure.
>>412559 I am indeed "the fed". Blow something up or whatever.
>>412546 Not having a b in the uri makes /c/ stand out as a separate entity and not just a /b/ spin-off, at least in my opinion. It's also easier to call their users names with c than with cb.
(2.35 MB 1784x1244 BLM v tuber.png)

(248.22 KB 417x462 crying Mark.png)


Are there any images that trigger deletions on sight besides soyjaks and CP? Careful or you might misidentify or ban someone that isn't part of some outside group again.
>>412601 >my derail bait I post every single thread got deleted this is unfair You've going at this for months, don't you think it's time you got a less retarded hobby?
>>412563 Say anything mildly edgy and get accused of being a "fed" and BOOM, that's an instant ban for you. We are not allowed to have any kinds of dark or ironic humor of that kind anymore. Mark is truly the cancer killing 8chan, why did he not fuck off? I swear that "retirement" thread was just another ploy for him to get attention. >>412601 Marks asshole or maybe acids dating profile.
>>412612 >Say anything mildly edgy and get accused of being a "fed" and BOOM, that's an instant ban for you. Not really. I got banned for being a fed because I asked anon to source his random claims about vaccines he was making. >We are not allowed to have any kinds of dark or ironic humor of that kind anymore. If your humor is literally just random calls to violence then of course your shit is going to get deleted. I don't know if you're aware but declaring your willing intent to murder people is actually a crime. It really isn't that difficult to just say "the world would be better off without X". If you can't put the minimum amount of effort into veiling your rhetoric so it isn't criminally fucking prosecuted then I don't know what to tell you retard.
>>412624 Yeah you got it man. Post some child porn while you're at it to stick it to the man. You're a real bad ass risking the entire platform because you don't have the intellectual capacity to formulate sentences with more depth than "KILL NIGGERS AND KIKES AND BLOW UP FEDERAL BUILDINGS". Kill yourself you stupid fucking glownigger.
>>412630 >glownigger completely incapable of basic reading comprehension Sounds about right.
>>412635 Because it's analogous to what you're demanding. Which is that you should be allowed to push the boundaries of legal content simply because you want to without regard for how it might impact the site and peoples ability to access and use it. It's the exact same nigger brained short sighted nonsense that pedoniggers use to kvetch about not being able to post half-naked children on /hebe/ all day. The fact you needed that explained to you is fucking embarrassing. Pick up a book or something man, holy fuck.
>>412612 Don't forget going into detail when saying you had a bad day may or may not earn you a "niggerpill".
>>412616 >It really isn't that difficult to just say "the world would be better off without X" Kill yourself sounds a lot better. Kill yourself.
<<412639 >still pretending to be retarded Sorry, not interested in discussing things with someone going out of their way to be disingenuous. Maybe someone else in the GG thread will take her herd nigger bait.
>>412638 I got banned as "niggerpill" for being mildly pessimistic about something and I got banned for being a "fed" because I said that the best way to stop a growing authoritarian regime is with an armed revolt, which is exactly how the fucking American Revolution out of all things happened. I didn't even suggest that anyone should do that I just stated my opinion which at this point, considering whats going on in Australia might as well be a fucking fact.
Remember Kike, we aren't just a string of numbers and letters, we are actual human beings behind these text boxes and we deserve to be treated as such.
>>412647 Someone should make a board where we can talk about political issues so we don't need Mark to moderate us since he's fat and dumb lol.
>>412611 I'm not the only one posting it and it's better than benis or "rabbit rabbit rabbit" posting.
>>412653 it's called >>>/pol/
(85.27 KB 370x500 979548023.jpg)

>>412649 >t. bot
> #GG - Politics, covid conspiracy theories, hentai, philosophical debates about molesting children, and anything but video games I never thought I'd want old Mark back when he used to ban me for responding to his meta posts in the GG thread on vch for off-topic. At this point even your spiteful moderation would be better than whatever the fuck you've let those threads become. This board is a complete shit-show.
>>413338 Don't forget the choice of posts staying up and whether or not any action is to be taken is apparently decided at random.
>>413338 The GG thread is a complete dumpster fire and it should be moved to its own board, but just don't use it?
>>413368 Based woCHAD poster making Mark/v/ seethe >>412666 This. At this point 4cuck is a better place than here.
Ah fuck I triggered a herd nigger samefag episode with my bitching. I'll blame acid for this.
>>413380 It's just /cow/ they used to spam /co/ with the same shtick after they got tired of getting deleted in the gamergoy thread.
>>413382 I miss /cow/ before all the bros left and it became a FoxDicksridden shithole.
>>413383 It was good fun back on OG 8chan, nu-/cow/ is a fucking embarrassment.
Is this thread being raided or something what the fuck
>>413391 >this new A discord cabal of herd niggers have been here for the last couple months doing this every day to half the boards on the site along with spamming child porn. Acid says its okay though because its free speech.
(73.51 KB 630x1200 Bill Leotardo.jpg)

>>413385 >You have a hugbox right here Your whole fucking board is a hugbox along with KiwiFarms. You're a Discord spic in denial You're a mentally unstable pathetic piece of shit with no life who laughs at people who are in the same situation, but got doxed. You post Wojaks made by Discord trannies that forced them into cuckchan just like SA used to do it on /b/ before Discuck was a thing. Just cut off your micropenis already and join the 41% 50%
>>413525 >>413531 >>413532 Why aren't they outraged at the fact that today, right now there are niggers in africa selling other niggers as slaves?
This thread should honestly be uncycled, all it does is attract trolling and bitching 24/7. Now I understand why the cripple and yogapig always abandoned their meta boards
>>413534 Why are you responding to niggerpill? >>413538 /site/ and the GG thread already serve the roll of this thread, it shouldn't have been a permanent mainstay.
>>413538 >all it does is attract trolling and bitching 24/7. <He says, as he bitches in the thread, contributing to the problem to which he offers his solution Give 'em the poison, offer the cure.
(407.12 KB 400x400 itkeepshappening.gif)

>>413623 >bitching about the person whose bitching about the thread thats dedicated to bitching about things
>>412550 Go to bed, fed. >>412639 >Pushing boundaries of legal content isn't posting outright illegal content, actually. Tell that to Acid and everyone else. /hebe/niggers trying to push boundaries on what is and isn't CP get the rope, just as well as fedniggers pushing the line on what is and isn't a legitimate declaration of intent to commit a crime. >>413248 No U. >>413391 I've got your raid right here, *BBBBBBBBRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP* >>413646 You sound like a little bitch.
I started a new job and the only thing I really wanna spend my dosh on is a new PC. Been away for a while what's the opinions on Intel/AMD and nvidea cards? I got an amd cpu & gpu my cpu is a special item to enthusiasts now so it's like 500-1000 which is funny They all jewish shit now or am I in the clear still?
>>413657 Sir, this is the meta thread.
>>413660 I realized that after I posted, thought I was in the QTTDOT
>>413663 It's okay, just make one shitpost and/or meta complaint before leaving, and I won't report you to the bobbies.
Ticking sage on the reply section at the top of the page doesn't seem to actually sage. If it's working as intended then this post should not bump the thread.
>>413956 Temp disabled due to instability after 2.6. Try manually entering sage in the email field for now.
I wish we were back on comfy vch man. Mark you trusted another idiot with hosting /v/, this constant pedo and herd nigger infestation is lame as fuck and Acid is a retard for defending it.
(981.20 KB 1400x1218 ClipboardImage.png)

>>414497 >muh pedophilia is free speech
Why is the played/expected/got thread bumplocked?
I went to cuck/v/ a while ago and derided them for having .webms without sound. To my genuine amazement, they told me IT'S A FEATURE and that they prefer it that way. Based on that critique they accused me of being from 8kun, which was pretty funny since there's only one actual human on 8kun, engaged in a Sisyphean struggle responding to shillbots and glownigs in an endlessly-repeating cycle. My point is, how much of a fucking subhuman do you have to be to defend the lack of such a basic feature? Are they really so far gone? More importantly, why is sleepychan so much better for actually talking about vidya, yet so inferior for banter and funposting?
>>414690 Because they aren't cuckolds like people here.
>>414532 That's why places like Pedi chan were necessary. That way pedo board cultures could coalesce away from places like 8moe.
>>414690 The presence of Mark induces the presence of the kind of people that can stand and in some cases will suck up to Mark. A vicious cycle of shit.
>>414691 >>414697 Neat. So hey, I dipped out for a while after 8ch died and I'm only just coming "back". Tell me, how do we fix this shit? The webring seems like a half-assed solution, but what's the alternative? Feel free to call me a faggot if I'm treading old ground.
(300.34 KB 900x630 you_might_be_retarded.jpg)

(16.27 KB 227x222 retarded.jpg)


(86.87 KB 1006x921 computer retard.jpg)

>>414640 Back on 8ch we used to have them every so often and they were never bumplocked even once, we also had "post your dream game" threads were one anons would post his detective game with greek monsters or some shit every time and that never got bumplocked either, those threads were always great. I have a dogshit ADHD memory and even I remember it used to be like that. Here was my post in that thread calling the kike out for this shit >>>/v/414724 Either Mark died and been replaced or a literal glownigger or newfag became a vol. Pics related, they all are for mark.
>>414731 Power corrupts. Mark let his control over the board go to his head and turned into a curator of content rather than letting the users curate the content themselves through their own engagement with it. Whats left of this board is what you get as a result, where the few users remaining have no idea what could be done to fix it other than putting even more of a stranglehold on whats allowed to be posted, to delete even more things, because thats the mindset Mark has. Who could've predicted that when you force the users of your board to be a reflection of yourself under threat of having their posts deleted that all you end up with is a handful of people that agree with you about everything?
>>414701 The alternative to decentralization is centralization. In a different time or zeitgeist I could see decentralization working (like webrings commonly did in the past) but given what I've seen over the past few years the best (as in highest quality) option was a centralized site like OG 8chan. Maybe that'll happen again soon and last a few years before dying, which seems to be the case for all decent sites. >>414731 I'd chalk it up to the new moderators/vols right now.
Mark unbumplock the played/expected/got thread. I had fired up my creativity cells for that thread
There is no reason at all for the What I expected what I got thread to be bumplocked. Fix this shit!
(66.17 KB 468x425 97812534579813241324.jpg)

HOLY FUCKING SHIT, WHY THE FUCK DOES /hebe/ STILL EXIST? DELETE IT DELETE IT DELETE IT DELETE IT
>>414692 Pedo boards exist, they're just on the dork web, where pedos belong.
>>416026 >no one around on /b/ to report I'm around, and they're dumping studio sets right now, but at this point, I've given up.
>>416032 Actually, now that I check the timestamps, that studio dump started over 24 hours ago, and in the cyclical pedo general too, where it would garner extra scrutiny if the moderation were active within the last 24 hours.
>>416033 The only vols are darwin (an actual pedophile) cuteless (a self admitted pedophile hired by chai precisely because he was a pedophile) The BO claims he loves talking to pedophiles because they are very interesting. However despite his claims Chai logs in once a week to not talk to pedophiles or moderate his board. Oh and there's a new vol the alinafag thats a pedophile obsessed with one russian child in particular. So does that answer your question?
>>416033 And even further, one of the images up for over 24 hours is from a risque set with exposed nipples visible through sheer clothing. I've reported it, since it's actually illegal and all. Not that I think it will help much, I'm just autistic.
>>416039 I stopped reporting last month. What's the point? The BO wants it to be a pedo board, and site administration doesn't seem to give a shit.
>>416038 I think /b/ is cursed. I was a pedophile too when I held a position there.
>>416042 Well maybe. I've told you the bad news exclusively. Now heres the good news. 2 days or so ago Acid went on a tear deleting more pedo posts and threads then anyone previously, and this recent push for more global volunteers appears to be part of his plan for dealing with them moving forwards. Now I think personally that there is plenty more he could be doing, but for whatever reason he doesn't. It's worth noting that he does have a job. Maybe he's just busy.
>>416036 The 6 years of top down intervention 8chan had just acted as a never-ending chemotherapy that killed off everything indiscriminately. You've been saying this site is a honeypot every day yet you still come here so you either don't believe it yourself or don't care enough to stop coming here. Just like your empty threat to leave if they don't do what you want this bullshitting amounts to nothing, I don't get why you're doing it.
>>416042 >like every other image board ever wasn't full of pedo mods. >like you have anywhere else to go .>>416049 > It's worth noting that he does have a job. Maybe he's just busy. this.
>>416049 A bunch of the previously mentioned faggot pedophile namefags are shitting up the global recruitment thread currently.
>>416057 Neber.
>>416041 You know, if you really hate it you should spam their threads with gore or other weird fetishes like giant girls and nose hooks. Fight fetish autism with fetish autism.
>>416066 As a pedo, I can confidently say that nose hooks or any other kind of pig nose will deter me from remaining in a thread for long should they be posted continuously. Not sure if the pedoniggers are just as bothered by them though. Probably not, since they prefer 3D with ugly visible nostrils.
>>416066 Is that really a fight you want to start? Of the two boards with a pulse on this site you could just not go to the one thats filled with users that post things you don't like.
>>416073 /b/ is for everything, even spambombing other faggots threads, provided its all interesting spam and not the same fucking images over and over. If kiddy diddlers wanna chat it up in /hebe/ i don't give a fuck but if they meander onto /b/ they should be ready to get a bloody nose for it, or perhaps a hooky nose.
>>416074 I missd the entire /revoltard/ saga. I will never care about them. >>416076 I prefer point and laugh.
>>416079 Stop posting that shit here. Post it on the cyclical in /b/.
(170.59 KB 318x257 1462329843480.png)

>revoltard can't even attempt to hide for more than 10 fucking minutes Nobody will ever side with you or your official /leftypol/ colony board.
>>416076 I've only ever posted in response to other posts, lately they've been yours. So really you have yourself to blame for coming here every single day to cry about how you want this site to be your own personal hugbox.
Global volunteer applications are open. Nut up or shut up.
>>416074 That ban message is very reminiscent of neogaf, I'm honestly surprised he doesn't treat this site like the imageboard equivalent of resetera based on his past behavior. Probably learned a thing or two from his experience as a BO.
>>416101 I put my hat into the ring and i'm 100% anti-pedo, (outside of the designated pedo boards that is).
>>416109 Good for you man, I hope you do well. Personally I haven't applied because I don't want to look at CSAM in NSFW boards on a daily basis. I've always preferred the SFW side of imageboards.
>>416101 Pssh yeah right. Look they'll take ya, but they wont set ya loose. They want you to play the gane their way, and that my friend is a posing proposition. You can delete pedoshit BUUUUUT, you need to carefully study it first to see if it truly qualifies under the current rules. And God forbid someone disagrees, like a pedophile, because then it gets put back and your the asshole. And what rules are the /intl/ herd niggers breaking? Think carefully because the wrong answer and your fired or called on the carpet to grovel for doing their fucking job for them. The only feedback they hear is whoever is loudest, and right now that's the pedophiles and herdniggers. Hell you so much as think of depriving a discord tranny the right to shit up the catalog and your out on your ear. No that's a fixed bum game anon. Fuck that. They don't need more people staring at child pornography to tell pedos to kick rocks, they could do that themselves if they wanted to. No what they want, what they need, is someone the pedos can blame and yell at. Because at the end of the day what Acid Mark Codexx and even Goldenrod want is to be left alone to shitpost in peace, and that will never fucking happen. Once you step over to site administration you have taken up a responsibility, and with that comes an obligation. And I think they never saw that coming. It's not something they want, and it clashes with their own underdeveloped ideologies of libertarianism. These aren't well thought out positions, it's just reflexive Reaganesque flag waving. They are trapped between needing to do what is right even if it is authoritarian, and essentially what is rightwing virtue signaling. They wanna be mr. Freedom despite not realizing the consequences of that philosophy applied to a message board. So no anon, I won't "nut up" and get the privilege of being screamed at by pedos, trannies, herdniggers, and the admins, just to get fired for doing exactly what they said to do. Fuck that. Who would?
>>416114 totally get it, I might be a bit desensitized since I was a vol on a very active /b/ years ago and had to delete some rather heinous stuff on the daily.
>>416121 shota, hebe, loli, and tot. should stay in boards made for that. right now its starting to get a little bit "MLP" up in this place with the pedo posting. (at the very least they should be putting it behind a spoiler)
(270.91 KB 1700x3008 Asuka beers.jpg)

We're letting applications pile up a little before we start. Emails with confirmations will start going out this weekend. As far as the pedos go, the drama surrounding them is tiresome, but there's good cause to think bad actors like the (now deleted) 6-year old bundle of asshurt up there are behind most of the illicit content attributed to them. A couple days ago I hit "delete by bypass" on a single persistent pedo on /b/ and something like 3/4 of all the pedo posts on the board vanished. This is not a large group of people who are doing this and we're not going to start cracking down the whole site over them. 8moe is more active now than the entire webring combined, and there are some faggots very upset by that who would love nothing more than to force a major shift against free speech here to damage us. I do have an option in my pocket that would split that hair fairly well, I think. But we're not to the point of needing it. Not over half a dozen losers.
>>416125 sounds about right to me. keep up the good work.
>>416124 You actually sound like the man for the job. Live up to these ideals and I will love you. Please. >>416125 Yo hire this kid here
>>416125 By what metric do you measure this site as being larger than the entire webring combined? If you ever bother to use it yourself you'd notice that there isn't a "large group of people" on this site in general.
>>416135 I believe him. I mean think about it, the /hisrol/ crew alone probably bumps us above 9/10 webring sites.
>>416135 Our global pph hovers right around double the webring's (right now is 83pph webring vs 158pph 8moe), and our UIDs are only a bit below their total count. That's being generous, as our UIDs are only for one site where they have an unknown number of crossposters inflating their total between 11 sites.
>>416137 I don't think anyone gives a shit about them any more than /qresearch/ or /vichan/ on 8kun. If bunker boards that don't contribute to the site as a whole were in any way relevant to it's overall activity then people would be raiding 8kun out of jealousy long before here. In my opinion it's all in the name, had it been given a new gamergate centric name I'd bet it would still be on the webring and be just as relevant as all the other webring sites. For better or worse it's being propped up by what little clout remains attached to the name its taken. >>416138 Why aren't all the bad actors working to undermine 8kun considering /qresearch/ alone has 520pph right now? You're really overestimating how much value there is in the kind of numbers you're talking about, for example a lot of the PPH today came from this gem of a thread: >>>/b/81270
>>416125 >We're letting applications pile up a little before we start >As far as the pedos go- I hope you guys can get a better handle on it once you have more manpower. >8moe is more active now than the entire webring Why do you have to say shit like this. It is cool that this place is getting more active, but phrasing comments like this is just going to cause more infighting.
>>416140 >Why aren't all the bad actors working to undermine 8kun considering /qresearch/ alone has 520pph right now? You're really overestimating how much value there is in the kind of numbers you're talking about, for example a lot of the PPH today came from this gem of a thread: PPH today? Yes. That thread had us at nearly 500pph. I'm referring to normal activity levels, not spam or shitposting fits. As to why target us and not 8kun, who knows. You know as well as I do that some parts of the webring have had it out for the site since we started. /cow/ went so far as to abet blackmail of two imageboard sites in their crusade against 2D lolis, which we allow. Autistic grudges inflamed by the site's relative success? Your guess is as good as mine. >>416151 I'm not shitting on them, I'm just pointing out the numbers. I do still like parts of the webring too, even after they kicked us off.
>>416145 What proof do you have that your boogieman is the right one? Or will you just go back to ignoring me now that I'm disagreeing with you since trying to engage has bitten you in the ass too many times?
>>416161 Are you pointing at child porn, or are you pointing at highly suspect but still technically legal child modeling images? The actual porn gets deleted but the borderline, kinda unnerving but not actually explicit material stays up.
>>416167 Why? It just encourages pedos to push that line further. Getting into a quibbling discussion about what is or is not child porn is exactly the game they want to play. The only way to win that game is to not play it. Just tell them to kick rocks and delete any sexualized kids posted.
>>416153 /b/ has been nonstop spam and shitposting fits all day every day for quite awhile now, to attribute that to the sites activity like anyone else would be jealous of is like being jealous of the inane schizoposting that goes on in /qresearch/ 24/7. Clearly that's not motivating anyone, at least from my perspective. >>416161 "herd niggers" seems to be your boogieman. I don't see how you can accept that there's bad actors flowing out of various sites but not accept that those sites come from the webring. You both seem keen on attributing the negativity surrounding this site to unsubstantiated boogiemen.
>>416171 I mean they use term herdnigger to identify themselves in the very threads in question... So... But anyway on the topic of PPH our normal is 150ish yeah, this recent spam has put us at like 500 but he isn't counting that as he just explained.
>>416168 That's the fine line of freedom; anything less and Acid would be Jim back in 2016, and we all know how he felt about loli in 2020. >>416169 Board context, i iamgine. Talking about alternative governments on /pol/ makes sense since it's all about politics and governance but talking about it on /k/ gives it militia implications and maybe revolution paranoia. Talking about video games on /v/ has different context than on /hgg/ where it's clearly all about the porn; if the /hgg/ thread turned into flat-out porn, would you demand the removal of the thread outright because it tempts porndumps or just delete the porn itself because it's what doesn't belong?
>>416125 Nicely done faggot, freedom is the best route Keep it up and stay the course, its always tempting to go the easy route and be an authoritarian faggot, but don't do that Especially when time, effort and patience eventually leads to the truth
No seriously go to /b/ look at the threads. Its namefags saying "we are here to shit up the joint" And then they do and say "look at us shitting up the joint And afterwards in ten thousand other unnecessary threads they say "damn look how we shat up this joint" I don't think seeing this and saying theres some assholes shitting up the joint is paranoid.
>>416175 If this cabal of bad actors decided to use lolicon as a vector of attack instead of pictures of kids in swimsuits would you advocate for the deletion of the loli boards and it to be banned site wide? Your position seems purely motivated by self-interest and that if that if it was something you wanted to post then you'd have a totally different position on how it should be dealt with.
>>416181 Attributing motivations and collusion to them is paranoid though.
>>416187 Who gives a fuck what their motivation is? You don't ask a drunk why hes puking on your carpet, because who cares? You just throw him out on the lawn.
>>416181 I've dealt with this before in other places, though not with the same group. There are several possible outcomes: 1) Administration ban the shitters until they get bored and move on to the next target. Won't happen here. 2) Users bitch and moan that admins support freedumbs even for shitters, eventually users make their own place with blackjack and hookers 3) Same as 2, but users learn to suck it up and deal with the shitters themselves instead of fleeing like cowards. Eventually the shitters leave for greener pastures.
>>416189 I don't think posting videos of ISIS torturing and beheading people is "morally permissible", I also don't think an imageboard should be run based on whats morally permissible. But thanks for validating the fact that your position on this subject is solely based around what you personally like or dislike and that if they were spamming this board with lolicon day and night you would be on the total opposite side of this argument purely based on your own self-interest.
>>416196 >deal with the shitters themselves I'm down anon, but what exactly do you want me to do? Bump their shit threads with "kys" spam?
>>416197 If we had ISIS members on the board sharing those videos constantly, and also discussing the best way to kill more americans then yes that shouldn't stay up. We should tell these terrorists to kick rocks.
>>416208 >Morals are not based on personal beliefs I think the mere fact that this discussion is taking place proves otherwise.
>>416205 But a board for simulated child pornography with users discussing how sexy they find the children, that should stay up? You see how this is a slippery slope, right? >>416208 If morality was objective this discussion wouldn't even be happening because we'd already agree.
>>416209 >>416210 Do you think the efficacy of vaccines is objective or subjective? The answer to this question is very important to hopefully make you two subhumans realize how fucking unbelievably stupid what you just said is.
>>416210 >conflating drawings with child porn And the mask slips
>>416214 Why did we go from morality to vaccines, anon?
>>416217 Can you answer the question?
>>416219 Not without understanding the reason for your shifting the goalposts first.
>>416220 The point I'm making is that a difference in opinion on the efficacy of a vaccine has zero bearing on the underlying reality of the efficacy of a vaccine. The exact same is true for morality.
>>416223 >The exact same is true for morality does not follow from >a difference in opinion on the efficacy of a vaccine has zero bearing on the underlying reality of the efficacy of a vaccine
>>416224 What is the difference between an opinion on a vaccine and an opinion on morality?
>>416210 If the drawings are based on actual child porn then no. If the drawings are just someones imagination then yes. You have the absolute liberty to do anything you want, until the exact moment you negatively someone else. Wave your hands around like a crazy person, but not if your hands would impact someone. You see?
>>416214 The immorality of spreading disinformation about the vaccine is subjective, some people believe you have a right to speak your mind regardless of how uninformed it is, others think you should be silenced in order to stop a potential spread of harm. Your position is based on your personal feelings on the matter at hand, my position is based on a persons right to free expression regardless of the matter at hand. >>416216 Both are seen as immoral in the eyes of many people, which is why both are now illegal in many countries. Why would you disagree if morality is objective?
>>416198 Become a global vol and ban them as often as you complain here. Go full gayops and pretend to be a lolbert to acid and co. until you get the job, whatever works. Hell, you could use multiple fake emails to submit multiple applications and pretend to be multiple people, then use one global vol account to persecute them as violently as possible. If that one gets removed from global vol status, use your other ones more subtly. Of course, now that I've said this it will be much harder for you to do this, but hey, you hate them don't you? Better work for your money, honey, even though you'd work for free :^)
>>416227 >The immorality of spreading disinformation about the vaccine is subjective, some people believe you have a right to speak your mind regardless of how uninformed it is, others think you should be silenced in order to stop a potential spread of harm. Not what I asked but okay. >Your position is based on your personal feelings on the matter at hand, my position is based on a persons right to free expression regardless of the matter at hand. Yeah I already surmised that you're a nihilist who thinks posting child porn is free speech. That's not a very interesting position though. >Why would you disagree if morality is objective? Do you think the efficacy of vaccines is objective or subjective?
>>416198 >he doesn't know how to sage
>>416225 The effect of a vaccine are objective, I'd say. As proven by the mere fact that this conversation is taking place however, in conjunction with the basic fact that laws regarding "morality" are not the exact same everywhere but will have general "universals" arising from the fact that we live in a society and cannot do everything on our own, the same is not true for morality. I'm curious, what is your basis for claim objective morality exists? Note that there cannot be value with a valu"er" doing the valu"ing", and valuers seem to be subjective agents.
>>416226 So /pol/ should be deleted because they've been shown to negatively effect others through their radicalizing? Or is it just the people who negatively effect others that should be held accountable for their own actions?
>x is objective >therefore y is objective >please try to forget that x has no relation to y and I bringing it up because I need you to see the word "objective" being used Pathetic.
>>416232 >Not what I asked but okay. >okay. So we agree then that morality is subjective?
>>416236 They didn't do anything, others did after listening to them. Anon you are responsible for your own actions. Completely. That is the downside of freedom. You cannot blame your actions on "the devil"
>>416238 The typical retort to this is that morality is still "objective", but anyone who says otherwise is defective or something. In other words, "I'm right, and you're wrong."
>>416239 So then how do you justify your double standard? Why does /pol/ get to only have the people who cross the legal line be held accountable and continue to exist? But another instance of people crossing the line means everyone like them needs to be deplatformed entirely?
>>416228 So when you say users should deal with this themselves what you mean is that I should lie and cheat into a moderator position and then just do number 1. ... So 3 is just 1 with more steps.
>>416235 >The effect of a vaccine are objective, I'd say But people disagree about the efficacy of the vaccine. Was that not your entire basis for dismissing the concept of objective morality? >As proven by the mere fact that this conversation is taking place however, in conjunction with the basic fact that laws regarding "morality" are not the exact same everywhere but will have general "universals" arising from the fact that we live in a society and cannot do everything on our own, the same is not true for morality. What do you mean? Vaccines are not the same everywhere in the world, people react differently to the same vaccine. Humans interfacing with reality in unique ways doesn't change the underlying reality or whether or not something is objectively productive for the overwhelming amount of a given population. >>416238 No. >>416241 Morality is necessarily objective. If morality is not objective then it doesn't exist and should not be maintained. That means we should slaughter each other, rape each other, and do whatever we please. A world of moral relativity is a world that the overwhelming majority of the world refuses to accept because it is not an underlying reality worthy of acceptance.
>>416228 As for normal users, simply ignoring them and posting quality content is always a good strategy. There will always be argument-addicts who take the bait willingly, but the site as a whole doesn't need to revolve around one shitposting group. Frankly, outside of /b/ and meta threads complaining about 'em, the site doesn't revolve about 'em. There's so many other boards and threads to discuss different things in.
>>416242 Speech isn't crossing the line, posting pictures of sexualized children is. That's not a double standard. One is speech another is producing and distributing pornography. Separate activities that aren't easily conflated.
>>416245 People slaughter each other in war and return home as heroes because morality is subjective. Murder isn't objectively wrong. Also I just noticed you got your whole post history wiped by Mark, hows it feel to be on the other side of the rulecuckery? Quite ironic considering how your typical response to me has been to tell people to report me in the hopes that I'll have the same thing happen to me.
>>416249 This is a meta thread and I will continue to ask administration why they do nothing about an infestation. Do you see me complaining in those threads? Your telling me to shut up because I should be doing exactly what I'm doing already... I don't understand.
>>416248 Are calls to violence that are then fulfilled by someone who goes on a mass murder spree crossing the line?
>>416244 By the by, I was half-joking with you, thus the :^) face
>>416253 No. And individual is responsible for his own actions. Always.
>>416250 >hows it feel to be on the other side of the rulecuckery? Considering almost my entire argument has been about how post deletions are meaningless I would say it feels completely trivial, which was kind of my point. >People slaughter each other in war and return home as heroes because morality is subjective. Do you think the efficacy of vaccines is objective or subjective? >Murder isn't objectively wrong. Depends on how you define murder. Killing people isn't always wrong. Killing can be qualified in a number of ways.
>>416254 Oh. I understand. Thank you for explaining.
>>416245 >Morality is necessarily objective Prove it. Defining things into or as X is not proof that they are X. >That means we should slaughter each other, rape each other, and do whatever we please If you say so. To the contrary, however, you'll find that most people don't want to do the things you mentioned above, with the exception of the last one in varying quantities. Being pragmatic and having the goal of "surviving and thriving in the context of people being around you" alongside a ton of evolutionary pressure really will lead most people to not kill at wanton. However, killing itself is justified in certain circumstances, as we can readily see today. What is the source of your so called objective morality?
>>416256 So then pedos should have free range of this site and only the ones posting CP should be punished because only they should be held responsible for their actions? You can't have your cake and eat it too in this scenario.
>>416251 I never told you to shut up. I'm not arguing with you, my man. I just prefer posting quality over winging. By all means winge your rightful grievances here (as I too have done) but don't forget to have F U N elsewhere on 8moe. Smell the digital roses, make some music and post it, contribute to the mural, etcetera.
>>416250 If you commit a homicide in a war zone you will be prosecuted as a war criminal. If you kill other uniformed soldiers then all your doing is engaging in war. We in fact do not honor the officer in charge of My Lai as a hero. Although we probably should for the record.
>>416259 >Killing people isn't always wrong. Killing can be qualified in a number of ways. And the agents doing the qualifying are? This is very ironic. Are the qualifications universally agreed on? Is there some binding standard on them too?
>>416187 >attributing motivations and collusions to them is paranoid You are either helplessly naive or doing damage control. Either way, you are not worth paying attention to, its clear you're new to imageboards if you haven't realized how small the populations (and by extension, how incestuous and likely it is that its probably the same group of people doing this kind of shit for the better part of a decade)
>>416262 I understand that is your main argument, I do not however agree with it. Calls to action aren't illegal, unless you mention the specific individual you wish to murder. Posting child porn is however illegal, and as such should be deleted. That isn't eating a slice of cake and still retaining it, once again you are conflating two separate subjects
>>416259 How do you fit the differing views on the right to murder a home invader in one area compared to another into your objective morality? What about the death penalty? Or stoning adulterers to death? Why are the circumstances in which murder is justified varying drastically across the globe?
>>416265 Usually the UN. And yes we call them the geneva conventions, they were agreed to in 1949.
>>416263 Yeah that's a good point.
>>416261 >What is the source of your so called objective morality? Collective underlying desires that exist in almost the entirety of the human population. Morality is objective because we can find the right answers for every situation. The fact you accept that killing people can be justified is an admittance of this. Morality being complicated doesn't mean it doesn't exist, which is what any claim against it being objective is. There is always a right thing to do, a best option. You'll conceded that people always consistently gravitate away from moral relativity while also claiming that morality doesn't exist. It's absurd. >>416265 >And the agents doing the qualifying are? This is very ironic. Like those agents that qualify the efficacy of a vaccine? Why is a person qualifying that acceptable to you but not for morality? >Are the qualifications universally agreed on? Is there some binding standard on them too? Are the qualifications for vaccine efficacy universally agreed on? >>416268 >How do you fit the differing views on the right to murder a home invader in one area compared to another into your objective morality? What about the death penalty? Or stoning adulterers to death? Why are the circumstances in which murder is justified varying drastically across the globe? Do you think the efficacy of vaccines is objective or subjective?
>>416268 Who cares about global laws? The servers are in america. We are discussing American law. If your question is why does the law vary from state to state thats because our federal government is not supposed to set the laws in this country, we however already lost that war, and so you have the mish mash you see today.
>>416267 Why do you think this board always deletes any post making a call to violence toward a certain group? It's illegal, it doesn't have to be specifically targeted.
>>416277 No Mark is wrong about that, it indeed must be specific. You will notice his standards are not universal across this very website.
>>416279 8aa37a is a pedophile that thinks /v/ is the only board on this site.
>>416276 We're not talking about law, we're talking about morality. In one country you can stone an adulterer to death and it be seen as a moral act, in a western country you can't, this is due to the subjectivity of morality. Neither can be proven right or wrong because theres no objective measure for what is moral or immoral. Our moral objectivist here can't engage with these points at all for obvious reasons.
>>416281 I would argue that while illegal here it is still seen as moral by a large segment of the population. Probably why they made it illegal.
>>416270 And the agents the UN is composed of are? What about before the Geneva Convention? Are the precepts "universally" agreed upon? >>416275 >we can find the right answers for every situation Sure thing. >Like those agents that qualify the efficacy of a vaccine? Why is a person qualifying that acceptable to you but not for morality? Vaccines have observable objective effects. Morality is an abstract concept. Why do you keep trying to shift the goalpost so hard? You keep dodging questions and trying to form faulty analogies as well. You have yet to address the questions the other guy raised.
>>416286 People? What are you asking? Before then there were various gentlemens agreements mainly between kings... While although interesting this trip down history lane seems to be a bit of a tangent. Would you terribly mind coming back on topic?
>>416286 >Vaccines have observable objective effects. So do moral positions. >Why do you keep trying to shift the goalpost so hard? You keep dodging questions and trying to form faulty analogies as well. I'm not. >You have yet to address the questions the other guy raised. As we already went over people disagreeing on the underlying reality of something does not change said underlying reality. Something is either productive or it isn't. A vaccine is either effective or it isn't. Pointing out random cases where people disagreed on moral problems is not a refutation of morality.
>>416288 Is a person a subjective agent or an objective one? I don't think I need to ask, given the disagreement we're having here, but please. >Before then there were various gentlemens agreements mainly between kings... And these agreements had the same conditions everywhere and every place, and were upheld at all times? >Would you terribly mind coming back on topic? I'm on it.
>>416293 Do you think Adolf Hitler was a good person or a bad person? What about his actions?
>>416279 Very few standards are universal across this entire website, that doesn't prove much. 8chan came under FBI scrutiny thanks to its nebulous calls for violence that culminated in mass murders on more than one occasion while it's former hosting of pedo boards for years amounted to nothing. Based on that alone /pol/ is a greater legal threat to this site that you would be more concerned with if you were taking an unbiased view on the matter. Even so I wouldn't advocate for their deplatforming.
>>416295 There are no good or bad people. Some of his actions were moral and some immoral.
>>416299 >There are no good or bad people I'd get a different answer if I were talking to say a Christian. Noted. Can you list some of the ones you consider immoral, and why they were so?
>>416294 No, the conversation was about banning pedos and deleting pictures of children either sexualized, or being actively molested. This whole morality tangent is kinda interesting but doesn't really have much bearing on the main topic. So I guess have fun?
/v/ meta thread: whining about /b/ and discussing things you don't comprehend because of how retarded you are
>>416303 I haven't really engaged with that topic at all, if you follow the chain.
>>416302 Sending his army to die in the winter was immoral as it was negligent and counter-productive.
>>416293 If someone disagreed on the efficacy of a vaccine you could prove it through objective measures. You can't prove to someone that abortion is moral or immoral because morality isn't measured objectively, it's based on subjective opinion.
I think you guys need a philosophy thread. This isn't really that.
>>416311 The gamergate thread is 90% off topic bullshit too, might as well extend it to this entire board because nobody wants to use any of the other ones.
>>416309 It's not that you can't measure the cost/benefits of abortions, just that it's difficult to measure. If we push a policy in society and suddenly see a 50% increase in suicide rates that is a measurement of negative human experience. It is technically possible to come to the best answers for every moral problem, it's just very hard to do it because of an overwhelming number of variables in play.
>>416308 >Sending his army to die in the winter was immoral Haven't really seen this being evaluated in terms of morality before. Been called inept, yes. What would you say about some of his more...violent actions? >>416311 >This isn't really that The /gg/ thread is /bpol_with_some_porn_and_faggotry/.
>>416316 >>416312 So go post in the GG thread then? This is the meta thread sir.
>>416314 Morality isn't based on cost/benefits, or else abolishing mental hospitals and just killing all the invalids would be seen as a moral act because caring for them isn't productive. Your view of morality makes no sense at all.
>>416318 Why shit that place up even more?
>>416314 Are you advocating some form of utilitarian as the standard for your objective morality?
>>416316 >What would you say about some of his more...violent actions? My ability to come up with answers to your questions of complex moral situations has no bearing on my argument about objective morality. Just as I couldn't tell you the makeup of the human genome I can't come up with the perfect moral answers. But the human genome still exists and so does morality. >>416320 > or else abolishing mental hospitals and just killing all the invalids would be seen as a moral act because caring for them isn't productive Not necessarily. Sometimes killing innocent people isn't productive. Killing an unborn child who we know will develop with down syndrome is probably productive because no one is all that attached to them. But killing a teenager with down syndrome might not be productive because their death may be a net negative for the people around them. >>416326 Yes.
>9 am in Israel >anons show up to rulelawyer whu child pornography is not only permissible, but moral >and also random holocaust baiting You just cannot make this shit up.
I decided to enforce the rules on /b/ according to your interpretations, dear /v/irgins. What do you guys want me to ban more, now that the pedos and herdniggers are gone?
>>416336 BLACKED.
>>416333 They aren't calling child porn moral, they're saying there's no such thing as morality. No one has actually posed an argument for CP being moral. At least that would be interesting to engage with. Nihilists are even more retarded than people who think CP is moral. >>416336 I want you to kill yourself.
>>416332 Please just say that as long as a mental patient has no family it's morally permissible to kill them so that we can establish that your "objective morality" only has a single believer and it's you.
>>416339 Eugenics has had many adherents... So no your wrong lol
>>416339 It's possible that could be moral, yes.
>>416337 ok done >>416338 I know you aren't that clever and all, but I asked what you wanted to get banned, not what you wanted me to do
>>416342 What would you say about the religious position on this? Let's talk Christcuckoldry for instance
>>416344 What difference does it make what christians think about it?
>>416343 Wait seriously? Checking hold on.
>>416336 Every post whose digital root (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_root) is an odd number.
>>416347 if there are any threads left just link them and I will delete them
>>416346 they claim that the dictates of morality come from the hand of the eternal creator who exists for sure in the exact way they describe
>>416336 non-NTR porn content
>>416353 That's at least a bit sturdier of a basis then "my feelings are facts" which is basically the stance of our tornigger here.
>>416358 Although that does sound in line with the site policy, I'll only delete stuff if it can be considered serious.
>>416360 ban loli as well
(859.76 KB 2695x2021 Darwindamanjpg.jpg)

>>416350 Fucking A you did it. I mean theres some random posts scattered around but without the main hives who cares. Great work. Seriously have a pat on the back. I like you Darwin. I'm sorry I called you a pedo several times. Fuck chai and cuteless and the alinafag, but your alright.
>>416360 Oh god how many posts were in the pedo general? You might top Kaz, Acid, And vamps hiscores.
>>416363 >I looked at the meta thread on /v/ and saw that Acid has been noticing that the pph was increasing, which he considered a good thing, as he saw it as a sign that the site was getting more popular. In the same post he talked about deleting the posts of people he doesn't like on /b/ for what I consider to be non-understandable reasons, and complained a bit more about people actively conspiring against the site in his usual fashion. In this thread this was supported, but also there were some people complaining that there were still many problems on /b/, with groups like 'the herd' supposedly invading, pedos still being rampant, and other content that could be considered illegal or immoral. I myself used to not care for the rules at all, and when I saw posts breaking them while not definitely breaking the law I would just ignore the posts, but seeing as all the posters on /v/ and even the admins care about these things so much, I have decided to actually enforce them now. I will use the interpretations of the rules and the law, and the opinions on how to run a board well directly from the posts of the anons of the /v/ meta thread. This will create their perfect /b/, as the genuine anons of 8moe want it. lol i give this 3 days
>>416363 >alinafag hey take that back
>>416371 >no -- Fuckoff poser
>>416374 alinafag is cute and pure and so is his waifu
>>416376 Fuck off paedo
>>416376 yeah fuck off paleontologist
>>416343 >ok done >that post on /b/ I wonder how long this will go on for this is hilarious.
>>416400 It didn't last ten minutes.
>>416404 Honestly just nuking /b/ might be for the best at this point. Like maybe a built in nuke where all threads on /b/ just auto purge every 12 hours or something.
>>416406 /b/ was always a faggot-trap for retards; use /404/ instead
>>416404 Shame
>>416408 >use /404/ instead I already do lad.
>>416408 Yeah, guess there's no other choice anymore. /b/ is dead, long live /404/!
>>416415 It would be nice if the overboard wasn't being rendered completely fucking unusable though.
>>416430 oh i just got a text message from him it turns out he got raped by a pair of burly transvestites and likes it so much that he took them out for drinks and more rape bad luck but maybe tomorrow theyll get deleted
>>416430 H O N E Y P O T
(421.69 KB 828x1472 1611673219049-515.jpg)

>>416038 >Oh and there's a new vol the alinafag thats a pedophile obsessed with one russian child in particular. I'm not a pedophile, retard. And Darwin never actually does any sort of moderating--just dumb bans and deletions--in fact, he was posting a shitty meme thread while CP was actively being posted. So it's me and three other Vols who have much less time than I have. >>416041 The Board Owner hasn't been around in 2 weeks. I've been trying to claim it because I unironically believe I'd be the best for it--
>>416446 didn't the board owner announce that they quit?
>>416446 I hate posters like you so much. I wish you die you annoying piece of shit. Bet people like you use twitter and discord since those platforms always attract scums like you. I don't care if some anons want to fuck children but you have to act like such a retard god fuck. Ban all pedophile content, delete /interracial/ and /2dblacked/ and /hebe/ right now what the fuck are you doing mods what the fuck is wrong with you? Freedom is expression doesn't mean you can do whatever you want you fucking degenerates.
>>416449 Yes, and asked who wanted to be the Board Owner. I've been trying to claim it since--
>>416451 I can't tell if you're exaggerating or if that's how you actually feel. I'd prefer interracial shit be banned from /b/ but not the pedoshit because the last Board Owner who tried to ban the pedos brought the posts per DAY down to double digits. >>>/b/60467 One of the last posts from Chai I've seen; doesn't appear in logs from what I see--
(39.07 KB 620x341 11vw7f.jpg)

>>416451 >Freedom is expression doesn't mean you can do whatever you want you fucking degenerates.
>>416446 You will be spared in the coming purge.
>>416451 My personal problem with /interracial/ being up is that they seem to be Discordfags who actively participate in raids to "spread" their fetish. At least I think so. From what I've seen, that's more on Cuckchan and the board here is fairly dead. Anyway, at that point, you lose the freedom of expression(which I'm not sure you understand the meaning of) defense.
(45.82 KB 579x457 buddhist_on_muslims.jpg)

>>416460 >but dude you don't understand true freedom Yeah no i do, and i know that spamming the 2 boards so that it keeps being on the top list isn't freedom. Every time i use 8chan i have to look at those 2 fucking eye sore and train myself to not click on them by accident. They do this on purpose to piss people off, i have no idea how mods can let them do this. Also i have more beef with nigger cuck porn due to the fact that it is trying to humiliate and indoctrinate me into a cuck nigger lover, of course it's more disgusting than child porn. But of course who am i complaining to when the mod himself is a cuckold niggerlover. How about you drop the act acidman and tell us exactly what you are trying to do to us you fucking piece of shit?
>>416463 >train myself to not click on them by accident >trying to humiliate and indoctrinate me into a cuck nigger lover Anon, I...
(3.53 KB 289x174 blacked fan-boi.jpg)

>>416460 well that is a major part of their fetish, always hoping to spread it around like a mind virus until everybody is just like them... (they even call it "converting").
>>416138 >vs 158pph 8moe There was spam very recently.
>>416476 what does cuck chan get?
>>416182 I would.
>>416456 >the last Board Owner who tried to ban the pedos brought the posts per DAY down to double digits. It's almost like it's full of spam or something. >>416463 Acid is a hypocrite who only defends things he likes and ignores why people came to this website in the first place, exactly like Jim. Reflect on yourself, fatman.
>>416456 >because the last Board Owner who tried to ban the pedos brought the posts per DAY down to double digits. Who gives a fuck. Once upon a time, before anons were scattered, /b/ was a board where you can and did talk about everything. If our /b/ is so monomaniacal that it only talk about pedo shit and nothing else least it die then it deserves to die because it isn't really /b/ anyway. Even /v/ is more like old /b/ than /b/ is at this point.
(118.37 KB 682x306 even gayer porn.jpg)

>>416725 you say that but /v/ has always been /b/ 2.0
>>416726 Well what the fuck are we suppose to talk about? Videogames or some shit? I don't think those even exist anymore.
>>416733 >We don't exist Shit that's it lads, time to #CloseTheGate
>>416725 >Even /v/ is more like old /b/ than /b/ is at this point. This site is just made up of two cliques, the gamergaters and the original 8chan users. The former use this board as a catch all for everything and never leave it, the latter are predominantly pedos that use /b/ as a catch all for everything because they get banned from this board and their own board has arbitrary restrictions placed on it that /b/ doesn't. A BO of /b/ that bans pedos like this board does just results in /b/ dying because nobody here will use it and there is no one else.
>>416857 >original 8chan users >some fucking fins and refugees from 4chon Far be it for me to say that nobody from the original 8chan was around but gamergate filled 8chan tenfold when it swooped in and it's the only reason the /v/ board has been one of the reigning kings for years. Pedos won't leave /b/ because it has brand recognition and people go there as a default; /hebe/ is right there for the posting, probably with no vols left to patrol it, but they're all fucktard faggots with no concept of 'use other place', possibly because every -chan has a /b/ and they're squatting in ours currently.
>>416870 What motive would "fins and refugees from 4chon" have to come to this site in particular and use its /b/ as a bunker? I just don't see any evidence of that being the case. On the contrary it seems like common sense to me that the users of 8chan originally would come back to a site calling itself 8chan and hang out in the same pedo general threads that they did on 8chan. Nobody is using /hebe/ because it's the most rulecucked board on this entire site, of course they'd just use /b/ instead when the only difference is less arbitrary restrictions on content.
(74.64 KB 725x713 Untitled.png)

(77.10 KB 725x719 Untitled2.png)

>>416889 When someone says "original users" and "gamergate" in the same sentence, i assume they mean before the first 4/v/ exodus, and i vaguely remember form one post that i don't have saved on-hand anymore that it was mostly scandiweegans and like some people who lost their 4chan site to a greedy ozzy land owner. Having gone back and looked i have no idea what the finnish flag looks like and i don't see a 4chon so maybe they came later, but either way there was no active /hebe/ before gamergate came along, just the /waifuist/ faggots who got kicked off the site in mid-2018 to absolutely nobody's concern or notice.
>>416899 No U.
>>416897 /waifuist/ was basically a pedo board but it was low key enough to not raise the attention of the 4channers post exodus that were mass reporting the more blatant pedo boards so by the time Jim took over and started dealing with reports he was made aware of those ones but not /waifuist/ or the text only pedo board /younglove/. Those got nuked a few years later when there was nobody left to care as the site solely consisted of 4channers that were more than happy to see the place turned into 4chan lite and those on the trump train that would later go on to become the Qultists.
what was deleted this time?
>>416458 >oy vey goyim, liberty intrinsically means libertinism BECAUSE I SAY SO You're alone.
>>416451 >Freedom is expression doesn't mean you can do whatever you want you fucking degenerates. > Freedom is expression Even though you fucked that up, that's exactly how it is. What does /interracial/ have to do with how butthurt you are? or 2dblacked for that matter? I can see why /hebe/ is a problem. But the other stuff is just being a plain fag.
>>417339 C*cks get the rope alongside the p*dos.
>>417339 but it's true. If you're not a libertine, you're basically an IRL rulecuck.
>>417345 >If you don't allow c*ckoldry, you're a cuck. Not how it works.
>>417348 If you have a cuckoldry fetish, but you aren't a cuck, then you indeed are a IRL rulecuck, yes.
>>417351 prove me wrong
>>417353 It was coherent enough for you to get mad about it.
Has a tornigger ever actually made a good post? Is there a single reason not to filter the 000000 ID whenever is rears its ugly head?
Come here, show your face, answer my questions, and resolve this.
Tf is this "on topic thread" about? Faggot has been spamming random thread for at least 12h now.
A thread full of lgs has apparently been on /b/ for 15 hours. Moderation is dead.
>>417638 It's okay as long as we blame "the webring" instead of intl Acid doesn't have to do anything about it.
>>417638 Have you reported it?
>>417638 >lgs you know you love it.
>>417638 >lgs Local gun stores? Is someone posting the yellow pages?
>>417655 I gave up on reporting anything that isn't illegal months ago.
(1.64 MB 402x294 It'sHappening.mp4)

Guess what's on /b/ again?
(462.93 KB 737x1000 proud small peepee 0.png)

>>418579 >Report it >Deleted within 5 minutes It's a Christmas miracle.
>>418580 I don't get pedo's IRL children are so ugly... loli I get, but the vast majority of 3D females (old or young) look ratchet as fuck. one time I told a fury the same thing about IRL animals, and it made them cry
>>418627 >but the vast majority of 3D females Yes, but there are a few diamonds in the rough. 2D is by and large superior though. 3D isn't worth the time of anyone who can enjoy the limitless world of 2D.
>>418627 That's because the majority of "Pedos" are just edgelords poking at a taboo. If you put most of them in a situation where they actually could fuck a kid most of them would pussy out. Same reason why guys who jerk it to incest doujins generally don't want to fuck their own mother. There's a big gap between the fantasy and the reality.
Imagine being so pathetic you cope by saying drawings are more attractive than flesh and blood women.
>>418684 >after awhile you get sick of seeing the same copy pasted shit and just want something unique for a change warts and all. I understand where you're coming from however I just switch to western art if I want more variety instead of 3D shit.
(326.14 KB 372x378 unnamed.gif)

(538.62 KB 1920x2623 s20_03_n01_78377_1274_off_a.jpg)

>>418720 In the sense that its a different style from anime even if it has it's own same face problems which by the time I get tired of I'm ready to hop back to eastern again anyways till the cycle repeats.
>>25719 >ctrl+f "pedo" >104 matches Can we just rename this to "Lolicon Ethics debate general + periodic /b/tard pretend pedo trolling general"?
>>418738 Right after we rename /v/.
>>418684 Stop looking at the same generic shit then. There are different artists with signature styles you know, even among Japs with their sameface epidemic.
>>418723 Aren't those all the same artist though? The calarts potato is done by a variety of western artists. One guy have a sameface issue is different from everyone drawing the exact same shit.
>>418833 Boring. Let me know when the Blind Idiot God wakes up.
>>418730 Ah you are pedo trying to push cp nevermind then.
>>418928 Or, you know, he's a troll who knows that shit gets a rise out of people. Hanlon's razor, people. "Never attribute to malice that which can easily be explained by stupidity."
>>418948 Kill yourself.
>>418948 Fuck Hanlon, Legion for life.
>>418963 Legioniggers are nothing but a bunch of subhuman savages roleplaying as Romans with no real goal or future. Every time I replay NV I set them and their settlements on fire or chop them to pieces.
>>419020 Both Legion and NCR are a bunch of LARPers, that's why House is the way to go.
>>419031 How are the NCR larpers? They are reusing the tech and knowledge of pre-war america.
>>419020 >no goal or future Did you even play the game?
>>419031 >that's why House is the way to go Agreed. His route has the biggest potential for improving the situation of the Mojave with the least number of setbacks. NCR could be a nice choice as well if it wasn't because their true intention with the zone is to exploit its resources (water, energy, taxes, places to scavenge) to sustain New California, with bringing prosperity to it in a second place. The independent route has two tangible ends (making things as good as they were before the war started and making everything worse for everyone), and none of them imply a long-term development of the region. Only House has the objective of using the Mojave Wasteland's resources to further improve it. >>419056 Yes, that's why I know the Legion has no suitable people to command after Caesar's death as they don't care about his vision or ideals, only his persona. Lanius is nothing but a beast who only cares about engaging in endless battles, Vulpes only objective is to serve the current Caesar (Edward) like a God, Lucious is less retarded than the other two, but being around the same age as Caesar (if not older) reduces his potential time as a ruler, etc. Without Caesar telling them how to behave, the Legion will start making mistakes and engage in internal fights until a bigger power (NCR, an organized rebelion, high rank members fighting for the right to rule, etc) breaks them apart. Of the 4 choices the game has to offer, the Legion ending has the biggest chances of fail in the shortest amount of time.
>>419137 >After Caesar's death Not a necessary outcome of the questline in the short term. >Lanius is nothing but a beast Completely contradicts his presentation in-game. The man and the myth are two separate things, he clearly has a much better head on his shoulders than that when speaking to him, such that as an opponent you can even talk him down from trying to take the dam and continue pushing forward due to the strain it might place on the Legion and their supply lines. And the Legion ending has the Courier minted on one of its most valuable coins, it seems likely to me you'd be up for consideration with Lanius and Lucius if only because a Courier sufficiently capable to be in that circumstance is likely of a mind and potential to try to be. And Caesar's ultimate aim in victory is to settle the Legion with a new capital in New Vegas ala Rome and abandon most of the roving raider lifestyle they were built in, if he died and there was an internal power struggle immediately after the game concludes then it may not have time to stabilize, but assuming he survives the brain tumor removal and is installed I don't think it's nearly as likely it would have internal problems before being able to change sufficiently to become more stable. And I don't see the NCR being a sufficient outside threat if they managed to lose the dam to begin with, that likely also is accompanied with the deaths of people like Hanlon and their President who had been pushing for the expansionism that led them to conflict with the Legion in the first place - if he managed to botch it all and get everyone killed who back in California would be rushing to go back and do it all over again?
>>419148 >Not a necessary outcome of the questline in the short term. No, but even if he survives the cancer there's nothing guarantying that he'll be able to find a worthy successor in time. >he clearly has a much better head on his shoulders than that when speaking to him, such that as an opponent you can even talk him down from trying to take the dam and continue pushing forward due to the strain it might place on the Legion and their supply lines Yet in the ending where he becomes the new ruler he annihilates almost every faction and settlement without even considering the potential advantages of having them under their rule (something Caesar does). To him the Legion is nothing but a mean to keep engaging in his path of war, and is his refusal to forgive anyone in the end what convinces me the most that he'll eventually get the Legion destroyed. >And the Legion ending has the Courier minted on one of its most valuable coins, it seems likely to me you'd be up for consideration with Lanius and Lucius if only because a Courier sufficiently capable to be in that circumstance is likely of a mind and potential to try to be. Considering that the game ends stating that the player continues to drift through the Mojave, I doubt that the courier takes an official position of power and just continues being the official "errand boy who sometimes solves problems" in any ending (which wouldn't change things a lot in House and Yes Man's, since that's what they used the courier for since the beginning). A courier who becomes the next Caesar/General is unlikely. >And I don't see the NCR being a sufficient outside threat if they managed to lose the dam to begin with It's stated multiple times in the game that the NCR army is weak in New Vegas because the best rangers are guarding New California and the ones sent to Mojave aren't enough to cover the whole territory. A war in its own territory would be much more different than the one shown in the game, since the NCR would start with a strategic advantage. >who back in California would be rushing to go back and do it all over again? That's the thing, in a Legion victory over the Mojave the NCR would be forced to fight them again since the Legion has an expansionist politic that eventually will put the other states of the republic in their eyes.
>>419153 >find a worthy successor May not be immediately necessary, he could have plenty of time even if it's none of the listed choices or the Courier, since we have no information on how long a cured Caesar lives after the battle. >Yet in the ending where he becomes the new ruler he annihilates almost every faction and settlement without even considering the potential advantages of having them under their rule (something Caesar does). To him the Legion is nothing but a mean to keep engaging in his path of war, and is his refusal to forgive anyone in the end what convinces me the most that he'll eventually get the Legion destroyed. I don't think he's as capable a leader as Caesar and he's definitely more warlike but the fact he can have pause at all is notable, I would sooner have Lucius or the Courier or Vulpes in charge though. >Considering that the game ends stating that the player continues to drift through the Mojave It does not say this. It says the wasteland is forever changed and leaves it open, nothing about you continuing to drift. In some endings it implies you stick around like House keeping you at the Lucky 38 and if you had good karma, "with pride in his choice of lieutenant." Or "partly out of fear" with bad karma, but nonetheless - sticking around at least in the short term. The Legion doesn't specify, but it doesn't say you keep drifting either. >It's stated multiple times in the game that the NCR army is weak in New Vegas because the best rangers are guarding New California and the ones sent to Mojave aren't enough to cover the whole territory. A war in its own territory would be much more different than the one shown in the game, since the NCR would start with a strategic advantage. That's what I'm saying though, they aren't going to lose the Mojave in a disaster and then immediately head straight back in, Caesar would have a lot of time and territory on his hands before he even had to think of the NCR again especially with the likely ensuing chaos back home from their being humiliated. >That's the thing, in a Legion victory over the Mojave the NCR would be forced to fight them again since the Legion has an expansionist politic that eventually will put the other states of the republic in their eyes. In the long term I think they would go to California and try to conquer and incorporate that as well, but Caesar's whole purpose with New Vegas is cementing his wandering army into a more settled empire. Though I will grant if that delays more advancing into NCR territory they would also have time to regroup themselves as well, and taking NCR itself would be a challenge for sure. I just don't think if he has New Vegas and the NCR has pulled out after losing they'd be right back there attacking Caesar in New Vegas. I could see them harassing or scouting out the Legion routinely though. Another element we aren't considering is Lonesome Road by the way, while not an ending slide element, if you nuke NCR in that DLC their ability to interact with the Mojave at all is pretty fucked up I'd imagine, and probably a good bit of their territory at home. I will grant this is speculation, but they are nukes launched at NCR and the Long 15 and all.
>>419160 Sorry for the late response, I was making dinner. >It does not say this. It says the wasteland is forever changed and leaves it open, nothing about you continuing to drift. In some endings it implies you stick around like House keeping you at the Lucky 38 and if you had good karma, "with pride in his choice of lieutenant." I stand corrected in this part. Regarding an hypothetical attack on NCR territory after a Legion takeover of the Mojave, I agree that it would take a lot of time for both powers to get organized, but with that aside, I still believe that the Legion would fail to take over the rest of NCR territories because at that point it would start suffering the same problems the NCR has during the game (trying to hold an unknown territory full of people who hate their guts and are willing to cooperate with others out of spite for them). Realistically, I could see both empires end in a stalemate that would force them to expand in other directions while their frontier zones become hell on earth (kinda like North/South Korea at best and Gaza at worst). About the Lonesome Road end, since we (or at least I) have treated the courier as somebody with good karma, the most possible outcome would be a pacific one where Ulysses is convinced not to bomb the NCR and the courier doesn't bomb any other place. That said, I think we have departed from my original statement of House's route being the most benefical path for the Mojave.
>>419208 I like House too, I just wanted to defend the Legion. But I agree on your points about how California would mostly play out. Re: Lonesome Road, I feel like if you were Legion you'd pretty naturally nuke NCR in the circumstance regardless of your general karma because it's a pretty big tactical win from the Legion perspective to destroy the Long 15 in particular as traveling to the Mojave through the Divide is such a bitch for NCR. But it could go down other ways too, all depending on how you're RPing it.
>>419669 What does this have to do with the lolicon new vegas debate thread?
>>419669 Is it that same fag from before or a new one?
>just obliterated my entire post history because I made 2 posts pointing out japanese companies censoring is japanese censorship >didn't even say a single thing about vtubers or give a single fuck about them in the slightest Hope turning multiple threads I was posting in into swiss cheese was worth that one Mark.
>>419838 I restored the posts that didn't sperg over vtubers.
>>419860 None of my posts were sperging over vtubers. >It's Chink's pressuring Jap companies yet again into removing someone with threats of chink funds being cut. <Which is Jap censorship. If twitter leftists "pressure" a company into changing their game do we blame the company or the leftists? The answer is both. I know you faggots are all Japanophiles that think your special variant of bug people can do no wrong but at least try to tame your bias a little. This was the post I made. Can you point out to me where I "sperged" over vtubers? You didn't delete the post for being off-topic because the guy I was responding to still has his post up. I didn't even mention vtubers. I wasn't talking about them at all. I was pointing out that Japanese companies censoring things is Japanese censorship. I'm very interested in an explanation for how this counts as "sperging over vtubers".
(301.26 KB 1024x1001 why.jpg)

>>419860 >sperg over vtubers. why am I not allowed to wish nigger rape (and aids) on somebody that inadvertently made a champagne socialist bernie boo into a multi-millionaire?
>>419875 Because that's an opinion one of this boards boogeymen has so nobody else is allowed to have it. If I was them I would start giving my opinions on the widest variety of topics possible to guarantee that nobody is allowed to talk about anything.
>>419875 We have a god damn board for this shit, use it. >>>/vyt/. If you use this board then maybe we could get discussion related about them gain traction instead of flooding the GG threads with even more bullshit?
(7.37 KB 191x255 1609224392097.jpg)

Delete criticism of vtuber of any variety except for that spam nigger is beta male tier, chief. Nice of you to use the spam nigger as the bogeyman to remove all anti cam whore sentiment.
>having a non pre-approved opinion read: makes Mark cry Careful with how you express that, you must be [boogeyman]! I can't tell who's more retarded; the faggot deleting willy-nilly after having a cry, or the parts of the userbase sucking his cock for doing so. >>419864 Good luck ever getting a coherent response.
(225.36 KB 1000x1000 616f4a13c0619fae655023a28eafffbf.jpg)

(55.31 KB 400x400 Tesla Quote .jpg)

>>416025 >WHY THE FUCK DOES /hebe/ STILL EXIST? Because all Alt Chan's are inherently honey pots. There is no such thing as an independent Chan that isn't ran by FED's so those are the only real choice you've got Spook websites and google. Welcome to Web 2.0, it only gets worse before it gets better which it will eventually regardless but Big Tech will keep desperately throwing monkey wrenches at their competitors and if not for government intervention and the stigma that surrounds alt tech like say odysee despite it not really being all that radical actually is the only reason they haven't gone bankrupt. Proggess is inevitable both the good and bad kind. >>416400 Schrodinger a cute, CUTE! I want a spin off series were he does a bunch of action shit and slice of life shit in Brazil and Argentina prior to invading Britain, just make it like something similar to the Black Lagoon spin joke OVA's.
>>416025 Stop clicking the link you closet pedo
>>419988 I'm not.
Loli is based.
>>420361 You were a loli anon? No way!
>last post was 2 days ago lmao wtf is going on here why are you such a fucking retard sperg you fat mongoloid fucking fat cancer fuck
>>421225 >tsundere herdnigger heh
(37.00 KB 673x520 ClipboardImage.png)

>>421225 >>last post was 2 days ago Wut?
>there are 0 PPH boards where the mods react faster to herdnigger raids than this one does Nice
Please clarify on avatarfagging because shit is getting annoying now?
>>421527 >parked What is "parked"?
>>421519 >>421527 Why is nearly ALL 3DCG porn absolute trash?
>site gets shilled on the promise that mark won't be involved in administration >turns out acid is even more retarded than mark is I concede to the many anons I've argued with over the years who proclaimed "but what if we got something worse than Mark". You were right, it can get much fucking worse than mark somehow.
>>421547 It's not all bad.
>>421552 Which is why he used the qualifier "nearly".
>>421549 >site gets shilled on the promise that mark won't be involved in administration >Turns out, the only board that isn't practically dead is Mark's board
>>421614 >>421592 Just delete and ban anyone posting Toga, until he stops, and apologize for and restore any false-positives that get nuked in the crossfire.
>>421539 Posting a picture of one (1) character with your replies, possibly as if you're pretending to be that character. Sub-clause: Acid can do it because he's the guy in charge and tubby talmud is nothing if not subservient until he decides to break things off for one reason or another. I imagine ROBanon would also be an exception if he hasn't been driven off years ago since he does it to tell a story and i suppose ROB isn't an established character, and probably the tewi monthly rabbit faggot likely wouldn't get the axe either since, again, mark.
>>421625 >Toga THAT'S what her name is. I kept thinking it was Toki.
(772.52 KB 450x253 toki sad.gif)

(25.43 KB 474x359 toki.jpg)

>>421519 Speaking of which, can anyone confirm these posts? If true wouldn't that change things? >>421653 >>421644
Did the cake kike advertise 8chan somewhere and forgot to "brag" about it with everyone? Feel like the overall IQ of posters here jump off a cliff in the last few weeks.
>>423267 It's just the usual /cow/ gang, Luciano, and Niggerpill.
>>423269 And one autist that keeps making Half-Life threads.
What happened to the Sekiro thread?
>>424520 Nevermind. It's still there but it's misspelled so it didn't appear in the search.
There are pornographic images of children on /hebe/ at this thread. >>>/hebe/9070 I already reported just to be safe.
This board has gone to complete shit in the last few months.
>>424798 Anons (or disinfo shills) have literally been saying that for years, yet here we still are.
>>424813 I don't see how you can read some of the threads lately and not want to vomit due to the 4/v/ tier posts. We got an influx of those retards during E3 and it's just been getting steadily worse by the day.
(143.95 KB 1280x720 xc nia 2.jpg)

>>424816 >everything I disagree with is cuckchan This is as dumb as the "soul" shit


Forms
Delete
Report
Quick Reply